|
Notes:
|
To be able to extend the operation of a solar power plant (CSP) up to 15 h, thermal energy storage (TES) is necessary. But TES also provides more versatility to the plant and makes its reliance during operation hours more dependable. On the other hand, due to the different CSP configurations, a broad spectrum of storage technologies, materials and methods is needed. Sensible and latent heat storage are known technologies in CSP, but thermochemical storage (TCS) is still very much at laboratory level. Nevertheless, TCS has de advantage of nearly no losses during storage and very good volumetric energy density. This review summarizes and compares the different TCS that are today being investigated. Those systems are based in three redox reactions, sulfur-based cycles, metal oxide reduction–oxidation cycles, and perovskite-type hydrogen production, and metal oxide non-redox cycles due to their similarity. This review shows that all these cycles are promising, but none of them seems to have all the characteristics necessary to become the only one storage system for CSP. The main conclusion of the review is that the calcium carbonate is the cycle with most experimentation behind it to infer that it could be viable and should thus be attempted at a research plant scale once a reactivation cycle can be designed; and the manganese oxide cycle, while less developed, is fundamental enough to be a suitable application for desert climates over the rest of the water-frugal or even water-avoiding cycles.
The work was partially funded by the Spanish government (project ENE2011−22722). The authors would also like to thank the Catalan Government for the quality accreditation given to their research group GREA (2014 SGR 123) and DIOPMA (2014 SGR 1543). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union׳s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007−2013) under Grant agreement n° PIRSES-GA−2013−610692 (INNOSTORAGE). |
