The State of Hawaii has set a target to achieve a 100% Renewables by 2045. Due to the State’s high electricity prices and dependence on imported oil, renewables are seen as an environmental and economic solution to the problem. While the state has seen substantial renewables growth in the last few years, a truly transformative system is needed to push for a fully renewable future. This system would be likely to include Demand Response (DR) capability, Distributed Energy Resources and the like. This report models various different scenarios – different rate schedules, energy storage and energy production technologies – to determine which combination can deliver the most economic value. Time-of-Use and Flat Rate Schedules form the basis of the analysis, along with solar self-supply and solar export options for customers that would like rooftop PV. The average Hawaiian Resident’s load and solar production profiles are constructed – and along with the financial incentives of various schedules and DR programs – the optimum solution was determined. For Time-of-Use (TOU) Schedules, customers derived maximum economic value from utilizing storage to arbitrage consumption across different time periods. By shifting consumption, customers were able to achieve payback periods of under two years, and significant bill savings. While adding solar panels to their roofs also created a viable economic case – the TOU rate structure often conflicted with solar production, leading to a less-than-optimal result. For Flat Rate Schedules on the other hand, customers derived maximum economic value from employing solar PV systems (without storage) and exporting excess solar to the grid. Without the battery, the upfront costs of the system were much lower than other options and coupled with a decent export credit rate – the customers were able to attain payback periods under four years. The report concludes that while these two options would be beneficial to customers, there is significant room for further exploration. This could include redesigning or refining the TOU Schedule and modeling various system size combinations. Ultimately, designing a 21st-century renewable system would require going beyond optimizing for a single customer but also modeling the grid impacts of choices different customers could make. Hence, this report serves as a stepping stone to a larger exploration of the grid of the future.