dc.contributor.author |
Mancho Barés, Guzmán |
dc.date |
2016-04-02T10:05:48Z |
dc.date |
2004 |
dc.date |
10000-01-01 |
dc.identifier |
1572-8668 |
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/56789 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/56789 |
dc.description |
Ever since its first edition, scholars of Orrmulum have conventionally divided its introduction into three sections: Dedication, Preface, Texts and Introduction. Indeed, modern editorial practice would seem to justify this division. Yet this article argues that a new division of the opening of Orrmulum may be proposed once the theory of medieval authorship is brought to bear on the contemporary tradition of the Aristotelian prologue. |
dc.language |
eng |
dc.publisher |
Kluwer Academic |
dc.relation |
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B%3ANEOP.0000027475.41216.69 |
dc.relation |
Neophilologus, 2004, núm. 88, p. 477–492 |
dc.rights |
(c) Kluwer Academic, 2004 |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
dc.subject |
Paternitat literària |
dc.subject |
Literatura--Edició |
dc.subject |
Edat mitjana en la literatura |
dc.subject |
Aristòtil, 384-322 aC |
dc.title |
Is orrmulum's introduction an instance of an aristotelian prologue? |
dc.type |
article |
dc.type |
publishedVersion |