dc.contributor |
Universitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Filosofia |
dc.contributor.author |
Torralba Rosselló, Francesc |
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-03-23T15:38:53Z |
dc.date.available |
2020-03-23T15:38:53Z |
dc.date.issued |
1995 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2072/374068 |
dc.format.extent |
51 p. |
dc.language.iso |
cat |
dc.publisher |
Facultat de Teologia de Catalunya |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Revista Catalana de Teologia, vol. 20, núm. 1 (1995), p. 103-153 |
dc.rights |
© Facultat de Teologia de Catalunya. Tots els drets reservats |
dc.source |
RECERCAT (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya) |
dc.subject.other |
Kierkegaard, Søren, 1813-1855 |
dc.title |
Cristologia de Kierkegaard |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.subject.udc |
1 - Filosofia i psicologia |
dc.subject.udc |
2 - Religió i teologia |
dc.embargo.terms |
cap |
dc.rights.accessLevel |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.description.abstract |
This study is an introduction to Kierkegaard's Christology. Although the Danish philosopher never wrote a theological essay upon the mistery of Christ, there are many of his Diary writings and of his pseudonymous works that refer to it explicitly. After a brief introduction whre we mention the transcendence of Christ in Kier- kegaard's Corpus, we focus our analysis on an Anticlimacus pseudonymous work, Training K, Christianism (Indoevelse i Christhendom) (1850). Throughout this study-we describe the most significant points in Kier- kegaard's Christology such as paradox, cross or resurrection, and, in the last part, we make a critica1 evalua- tion of Kierkegaard's contribution to this field. |