Communications Angewandte Chemie International Edition: DOI: 10.1002/anie.201601834 German Edition: DOI: 10.1002/ange.201601834 Total Synthesis Synthesis of (À)-Cannabimovone and Structural Reassignment of Anhydrocannabimovone through Gold(I)-Catalyzed Cycloisomerization Javier Carreras, Mariia S. Kirillova, and Antonio M. Echavarren* Dedicated to Professor Miquel A. Pericàs on the occasion of his 65th birthday Abstract: The first total synthesis of cannabimovone from Cannabis sativa and anhydrocannabimovone was achieved by means of a highly stereoselective gold(I)-catalyzed cycloisomerization. The results led to reassignment of the structure of anhydrocannabimovone. The herbaceous plant Cannabis sativa has been used in medicine for centuries and still attracts significant interest due to the biological and pharmaceutical activity of many of its metabolites.[1] More than 60 compounds, known as cannabinoids (a group of C21 terpenophenolic compounds), are exclusively found in Cannabis sativa.[2] Owing to the development of synthetic cannabinoids,[3, 4] the unique components of Cannabis sativa are known as phytocannabinoids. The most abundant compound is D9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, 1; Figure 1), which shows interesting pharmacological activity as an analgesic, antiemetic, and appetite stimulant, among others, besides its well-known psychotropic effects.[5] Several total syntheses of 1 have been accomplished to date.[6] Figure 1. Cannabinoids THC (1), CBD (2), and cannabimovone (3). [*] Dr. J. Carreras, M. S. Kirillova, Prof. A. M. Echavarren Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ) Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Av. Països Catalans 16, 43007 Tarragona (Spain) E-mail: aechavarren@iciq.es Prof. A. M. Echavarren Departament de Química Analítica i Química Orgànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili C/ Marcel·li Domingo s/n, 43007 Tarragona (Spain) Supporting information and the ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/anie.201601834.  2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7121 –7125 Cannabidiol (CBD, 2) is another important phytocannabinoid with great potential as a drug[7] since it modulates the undesired effects of THC when they are administrated together.[8] A structurally different cannabinoid named cannabimovone (3) has recently been isolated by the groups of Taglialatela-Scafati and Appendino from a nonpsychotropic variety of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.; Figure 1).[9] In their attempt at preparing 3 from CBD (2) through an intramolecular aldol reaction of keto aldehyde 4 under mild acidic conditions, the product of dehydration (5) was formed instead (Scheme 1). Under basic conditions, the novel cannabinoid Scheme 1. Synthesis of anhydrocannabimovone (6) from cannabidiol (CBD, 2).[9] anhydrocannabimovone (6) was directly formed through an intramolecular oxy-Michael addition of one of the phenol groups to the intermediate enone. Synthetic 6 was found to be active against metabotropic and ionotropic cannabinoid receptors, showing a similar biological profile to THC, whereas cannabimovone (3) has affinity only for ionotropic receptors.[9] The unprecedented abeo-menthane terpenoid structure of cannabimovone (3) includes a densely functionalized cyclopentane with four contiguous stereocenters. The novel structure of 3, coupled with its lability towards dehydration under acidic or basic conditions and the interesting biological profiles of both 3 and 6, inspired us to develop a total synthesis that could allow access to a wide variety of  2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 7121 Communications Angewandte Chemie Scheme 2. Retrosynthetic analysis for 3 and 6. analogues. Herein, we report the first total synthesis of enantiopure cannabimovone (3) and also revise the structure originally assigned to anhydrocannabimovone from transfused 6’ to cis-tetrahydro-1H-cyclopenta[b]benzofuran 6. Our ’ approach to the synthesis of these compounds relies on a gold(I)-catalyzed cycloisomerization[10–15] of aryl-substituted 1,5-enyne 7, which could be obtained in a few steps from commercially available (+)-methyl (S)-3-hydroxybutyrate (9; + Scheme 2). The synthesis commenced with alkylation of the lithium enolate of 9 with prenyl bromide to provide known compound 10 with excellent diastereoselectivity (98:2) by following a slight modification of the reported procedure[16] (Scheme 3). Protection of the alcohol of 10 as a silyl ether, conversion of the ester into an aldehyde by a two-step procedure (DIBAL reduction/Swern oxidation), and subsequent homologation with the Ohira–Bestmann reagent led to 1,5-enyne 11 (31 % over 5 steps). Sonogashira coupling of 11 with iodo arene 12, prepared in two steps from olivetol, gave 7 in 83 % yield on a multi-gram scale. The gold(I)-catalyzed cyclization of 1,5enyne 7 was highly solvent dependent. Exposing 7 to the cationic gold(I) complex [(JohnPhos)Au(MeCN)]SbF6 in CH2Cl2 led to bicyclic compound 13 (49 %). A similar result was obtained using other solvents such as Et2O or toluene. Reaction in MeOH afforded methyl ether 14 (93 %). However, when the reaction was performed in DMSO, cyclopentene 8 was obtained in excellent yield (88 %). This reaction was performed up to a 2.1 g scale. A similar result was observed when the reaction was performed in DMF (79 %). Presumably, the initial intermediate of the gold(I)catalyzed cyclization (Int) undergoes proton elimination assisted by the solvent to give 8 after protodeauration. Notably, the gold-catalyzed cyclization led exclusively to the product with the correct relative configuration, thereby setting two of the final four stereocenters. Although deprotection of the TBS group of 8 followed by oxidation of the alcohol to the methyl ketone could be carried out uneventfully, isomerization to form the a,b-unsaturated ketone failed under all the conditions we examined with this and with other intermediates with different phenol protecting groups. Fortunately, the desired functionality in the fivemembered ring could be introduced by epoxidation with mCPBA and NaHCO3 to exclusively form 15, followed by Meinwald rearrangement with stoichiometric BF3·Et2O to 7122 www.angewandte.org Scheme 3. a) LDA, HMPA, prenyl bromide, THF, À70 8C to À10 8C, 3 h, 81 %; b) TBSCl, DBU, CH2Cl2, 25 8C, 14 h, 89 %; c) DIBAL-H, Toluene, À78 8C to À50 8C, 4 h, 84 %; d) Oxalyl chloride, DMSO, Et3N, CH2Cl2, À60 8C to 25 8C, 1 h; e) Ohira–Bestmann reagent, K2CO3 MeOH, 25 8C, 5 h, 51 % (2 steps); f) Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (5 mol %), CuI (10 mol %), Et3N/iPr2EtN (1:1), 25 8C, 16 h, 83 %; g) [(JohnPhos)Au(MeCN)]SbF6 (5 mol %), CH2Cl2 1 m, 25 8C, 30 min, 49 %; h) [(JohnPhos)Au(MeCN)]SbF6 (5 mol %), MeOH 1 m, 25 8C, 30 min, 93 %. i) [(JohnPhos)Au(MeCN)]SbF6 (5 mol %), DMSO 0.5 m, 25 8C, 3 h, 88 %. LDA = lithium diisopropylamide, HMPA = hexamethylphosphoramide, THF = tetrahydrofuran, TBSCl = tert-butylsilyl chloride, DBU = 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, DIBAL-H = diisobutylalane, DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide, JohnPhos = (2-biphenyl)-di-tert-butylphosphine. give ketone 16 (2,3-cis). Epimerization and cleavage of the silyl ether was achieved with aqueous HCl to give 17 (Scheme 4). The relative configuration of 17 was determined by NMR studies and was confirmed by preparation of the same compound by a different route, namely cleavage of the TBS group of 8 followed by epoxidation to give 18, which underwent Meinwald rearrangement to provide 17. Diastereoselective reduction of b-hydroxy ketone 17 by Saksena– Evans reaction with NaBH(OAc)3 in CH2Cl2 afforded diol 19. Protection with AllocCl, which proceeded with moderate selectivity, followed by Dess–Martin oxidation gave protected cannabimovone 20. Cleavage of the MOM groups using MgBr2 and BnSH,[17] followed by Pd0 deprotection of the allyl carbonate provided 3 (53 % over 2 steps). The spectral data and optical rotation of the synthetic cannabimovone (3) matched those reported for the natural compound.[18] Whereas the synthesis of 3 fully supported the assigned configuration for all of the intermediates, a crystalline oxabicycle intermediate 21 was obtained through treatment of epoxide 18 with a Brønsted acid, which led to opening of the  2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7121 –7125 Communications Angewandte Chemie Scheme 6. a) Ac2O, Et3N, DMAP, CH2Cl2, À30 8C, 1 h, 50 % (56 % brsm); b) DMP, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2, 25 8C, 1 h, 73 %; c) MgBr2, BnSH, Et2O, 25 8C, 24 h, 82 %; d) K2CO3, MeOH, 25 8C, 15 min, 60 % (6) and 19 % (6’’). ’ Scheme 4. a) mCPBA, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2, 0 8C to 25 8C, 3 h, 57 %; b) BF3·OEt2, THF, 25 8C, 30 min, 93 %; c) HCl dil./THF, 25 8C, 1 h, 88 %; d) TBAF, THF, 25 8C, 14 h, 83 %; e) mCPBA, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2, 0 8C to 25 8C, 4 h, 58 %; f) BF3·OEt2, THF, 25 8C, 1 h, 48 %; g) NaBH(OAc)3, CH2Cl2, 25 8C, 48 h, 48 % (77 % brsm); h) AllocCl, TMEDA, CH2Cl2, À40 8C, 1.5 h, 41 % (72 % brsm); i) DMP, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2, 25 8C, 1.5 h, 87 %; j) MgBr2, BnSH, Et2O, 25 8C, 30 h, 62 %; k) Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol %), dimedone, THF, 25 8C, 1 h, 85 %. mCPBA = m-chloroperbenzoic acid, TBAF = tetrabutylammonium fluoride, Alloc = allyloxycarbonyl, TMEDA = tetramethylethylenediamine, DMP = Dess–Martin periodinane. Scheme 5. a) m-ClC6H4CO2H, CH2Cl2, 25 8C, 1 h, 77 %; b) ZnI2, (NaBH4), (CH2Cl)2, 25 8C, 14 h, 63 %. X-Ray structure for 21. epoxide and trapping of the benzylic carbocation by the free alcohol (Scheme 5). The molecular structure of 21 was determined by X-ray diffraction, which confirmed the relative configuration between the isopropenyl and the hydroxyethyl substituents.[19] Treatment of 21 with ZnI2 effected a pinacol rearrangement to give ketone 17. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7121 –7125 Figure 2. X-Ray structures for 6 and 23. The synthesis of anhydrocannabimovone (6) was carried out from acetate 22 by MOM cleavage followed by treatment with K2CO3 to promote the oxy-Michael addition. Under these conditions, two separable epimers (6 and 6’’) were formed in a 4:1 ratio (Scheme 6). Surprisingly, although 1 H NMR of the major isomer 6 was identical to that reported for anhydrocannabimovone, very significant differences were observed in the 13C NMR spectrum.[20] Furthermore, the optical rotation of 6 ([a]22 =+ 40.68 (c = 0.29, CHCl3)) was 8 D very different to that reported ([a]22 = À178 (c = 0.02, 8 D CHCl3)).[9] The structure of anhydrocannabimovone (6) was finally confirmed by X-ray diffraction[19] and its absolute configuration was assigned on the basis of the X-ray structure of anhydrocannabimovone 2-bromobenzoate (23; Figure 2).[19] In order to clarify the discrepancy between our structural assignment and that originally reported,[9] we performed DFT calculations to study the oxy-Michael cyclization. Under basic conditions, oxy-Michael cyclization of the phenolate anion leads to cis fusion, which is more favored than the trans addition by 19.8 Kcal molÀ1 (Figure 3).[21] Furthermore, DFT calculations were employed to predict the expected 13C NMR chemical shifts of the different possible products.[22] Our data were in better agreement with the cis-tetrahydro-1H-  2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.angewandte.org 7123 Communications Figure 3. Energy profile (cis and trans) for the oxy-Michael cyclization. DFT calculations (M06-2x/6-31G(d,p) (MeOH), DG (kcal molÀ1). cyclopenta[b]benzofuran structure for anhydrocannabimovone (6).[20] In conclusion, we have accomplished the first total synthesis of cannabimovone (3). The four stereogenic centers of the target molecule were set up starting from the stereogenic center present in commercially available (+)-methyl (S)-3-hydroxybutyrate (9) and by using a fully + diastereoselective gold(I)-catalyzed cyclization. Interestingly, this is the first example of the cycloisomerization of simple 1,5-enynes into 3-vinylcyclopent-1-enes catalyzed by gold in the context of natural product synthesis. We also synthesized anhydrocannabimovone (6) and revised the stereochemistry at the ring fusion by X-ray crystallography and DFT calculations. This synthetic endeavor provides ready access to 3 and 6, as well as other synthetic cannabinoids, for biological testing. Acknowledgements We thank MINECO (Severo Ochoa Excellence Accreditation 2014-2018 (SEV-2013-0319), and project CTQ201342106-P), the European Research Council (Advanced Grant No. 321066), the AGAUR (2014 SGR 818 and Beatriu de Pinós Postdoctoral Fellowship to J. C.), and the ICIQ Foundation. We thank the ICIQ X-ray Diffraction and Chromatograpy units. We also thank Nfflria Huguet and Verónica L. Carrillo (ICIQ) for additional experiments and Dr. G. JimØnez-OsØs (Universidad de La Rioja) for computational advice. Keywords: cannabinoids · cycloisomerization · gold · oxy-Michael reaction · total synthesis How to cite: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7121 – 7125 Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 7237 – 7241 7124 www.angewandte.org Angewandte Chemie [1] a) G. A. Thakur, R. I. Duclos Jr, A. Makriyannis, Life Sci. 2005, 78, 454 – 466; b) Marijuana and the Cannabinoids (Ed. M. A. ElSohly), Humana, Totowa, NJ, 2007; c) P. J. Robson, Drug Test. Anal. 2014, 6, 24 – 30; d) R. Mechoulam, L. O. Hanus, R. Pertwee, A. C. Howlett, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 757 – 764; e) Special issue, Nature 2015, 525, S1 – S18. [2] O. Aizpurua-Olaizola, U. Soydaner, E. Öztürk, D. Schibano, Y. Simsir, P. Navarro, N. Etxebarria, A. Usobiaga, J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 324 – 331. [3] For example: a) R. A. Archer, W. B. Blanchard, W. A. Day, D. W. Johnson, E. R. Lavagnino, C. W. Ryan, J. E. Baldwin, J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 2277 – 2284; b) R. Mechoulam, N. Lander, A. University, J. Zahalka, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1990, 1, 315 – 318; c) S. H. Burstein, C. A. Audette, A. Breuer, W. A. Devane, S. Colodner, S. A. Doyle, R. Mechoulam, J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 3135 – 3141. [4] a) D. D. Dixon, D. Sethumadhavan, T. Benneche, A. R. Banaag, M. A. Tius, G. A. Thakur, A. Bowman, J. T. Wood, A. Makriyannis, J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 5656 – 5666; b) F. Gläser, M. C. Brçhmer, T. Hurrle, M. Nieger, S. Bräse, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 1516 – 1524. [5] a) J. Zajicek, P. Fox, H. Sanders, D. Wright, J. Vickery, A. Nunn, A. Thompson, Lancet 2003, 362, 1517 – 1526; b) K. R. MüllerVahl, H. Prevedel, K. Theloe, H. Kolbe, H. M. Emrich, U. Schneider, Neuropsychopharmacology 2003, 28, 384 – 388; c) K. Mackie, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2006, 46, 101 – 122; d) A. T. El-Alfy, K. Ivey, K. Robinson, S. Ahmed, M. Radwan, D. Slade, I. Khan, M. ElSohly, S. Ross, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2010, 95, 434 – 442; e) M. E. Lynch, F. Campbell, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2011, 72, 735 – 744. [6] a) D. A. Evans, E. A. Shaughnessy, D. M. Barnes, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3193 – 3194; b) B. M. Trost, K. Dogra, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 861 – 863; c) L.-J. Cheng, J.-H. Xie, Y. Chen, L.-X. Wang, Q.-L. Zhou, Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 764 – 767; d) M. A. Schafroth, G. Zuccarello, S. Krautwald, D. Sarlah, E. M. Carreira, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 13898 – 13901; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 14118 – 14121; e) F. Klotter, A. Studer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8547 – 8550; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 8667 – 8670. [7] a) R. Mechoulam, L. A. Parker, R. Gallily, J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2002, 42, 11S – 19S; b) C. Scuderi, D. D. Filippis, T. Iuvone, A. Blasio, A. Steardo, G. Esposito, Phytother. Res. 2009, 23, 597 – 602; c) E. Blessing, M. Steenkamp, J. Manzanares, C. Marmar, Neurotherapeutics 2015, 12, 825 – 836. [8] a) I. G. Karniol, I. Shirakawa, N. Kasinski, A. Pfeferman, E. A. Carlini, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1974, 28, 172 – 177; b) C. J. A. Morgan, G. Schafer, T. P. Freeman, H. V. Curran, Br. J. Psychiatry 2010, 197, 285 – 290; c) J. Sastre-Garriga, C. Vila, S. Clissold, X. Montalban, Expert Rev. Neurother. 2011, 11, 627 – 637. [9] O. Taglialatela-Scafati, A. Pagani, F. Scala, L. De Petrocellis, V. Di Marzo, G. Grassi, G. Appendino, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 2067 – 2072. [10] a) C. Nieto-Oberhuber, M. P. MuÇoz, S. López, E. JimØnezNfflÇez, C. Nevado, E. Herrero-Gómez, M. Raducan, A. M. Echavarren, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1677 – 1693; b) V. LópezCarrillo, N. Huguet, . Mosquera, A. M. Echavarren, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 10972 – 10978. [11] R. Dorel, A. M. Echavarren, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9028 – 9072. [12] Synthesis of indenes by cycloisomerization of 1,5-enynes: A. Martínez, P. García-García, M. A. Fernµndez-Rodríguez, F. Rodríguez, R. Sanz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4633 – 4637; Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 4737 – 4741. [13] Total synthesis through gold- or platinum catalyzed cycloisomerization of 1,5-enynes: a) V. Mamane, T. Gress, H. Krause, A. Fürstner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8654 – 8655; b) Y. Harrak, C. Blaszykowski, M. Bernard, K. Cariou, E. Mainetti, V.  2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7121 –7125 Communications Mouri›s, A.-L. Dhimane, L. Fensterbank, M. Malacria, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8656 – 8657; c) A. Fürstner, P. Hannen, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3006 – 3019; d) A. Fürstner, A. Schlecker, Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 9181 – 9191; e) G. Lemi›re, V. Gandon, K. Cariou, A. Hours, T. Fukuyama, A.-L. Dhimane, L. Fensterbank, M. Malacria, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2993 – 3006. [14] Total synthesis through gold-catalyzed Conia-type cyclizations of 1,5-enynes: a) S. T. Staben, J. J. Kennedy-Smith, D. Huang, B. K. Corkey, R. L. LaLonde, F. D. Toste, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5991 – 5994; Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 6137 – 6140; b) X. Linghu, J. J. Kennedy-Smith, F. D. Toste, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7671 – 7673; Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 7815 – 7817; c) G. Bellavance, L. Barriault, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 6701 – 6704; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 6819 – 6822. [15] Reviews on the application of gold catalysis to the synthesis of natural products: a) A. Fürstner, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3208 – 3221; b) M. Rudolph, A. S. K.; Hashmi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2448 – 2462; Hashmi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2448 – 2462; c) A. Fürstner, Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 925 – 938; d) Y. Zhang, T.; Luo, Z. Yang, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 489 – 503; Luo, Z. Yang, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 489 – 503; e) D. Pflästerer, A. S. K. Hashmi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1331 – 1367. [16] a) Procedure according to: G. Koza, C. Theunissen, J. R. Al Dulayymi, M. S. Baird, Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10214 – 10229; b) Spectral data and optical rotation in accordance with those Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7121 –7125 [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] Angewandte Chemie previously reported for (R,R)-10: A. Kramer, H. Pfander, Helv. Chim. Acta 1982, 65, 293 – 301. For example: a) S. Kim, I. S. Kee, Y. H. Park, J. H. Park, Synlett 1991, 183 – 184; b) W. H. Kim, A. R. Angeles, J. H. Lee, S. J. Danishefsky, Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6440 – 6441. See the Supporting Information for more details. Optical rotation: [a]28 = À6.88 (c = 0.70, CHCl3); (lit. [a]22 = À108 (c = 8 8 D D 0.07, CHCl3)).[9] . CCDC 1454956 (6), CCDC 1454957 (21) and CCDC 1454958 (23) contain the supplementary crystallographic data. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. See the Supporting Information for more details. Similarly, the cis addition was also favored for the pyrrolidinepromoted process. See the Supporting Information for more details. a) M. W. Lodewyk, M. R. Siebert, D. J. Tantillo, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1839 – 1862; some recent examples: b) K. N. White, T. Amagata, A. G. Oliver, K. Tenney, P. J. Wenzel, P. Crews, J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8719 – 8722; c) G. Hu, K. Liu, L. J. Williams, Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5493 – 5496; d) Y. Li, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 36858 – 36864. Received: February 22, 2016 Published online: April 27, 2016  2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.angewandte.org 7125