Publisher: GSA Journal: GEOL: Geology DOI:10.1130/G39344.1 Southwestern Africa on the burner: Pleistocene carbonatite volcanism linked to deep mantle upwelling in Angola Andrea Giuliani 1,2,3,*, Marc Campeny 4,5, Vadim S. Kamenetsky 6, Juan Carlos Afonso 2,7, Roland Maas 1, Joan Carles Melgarejo 5, Barry P. Kohn 1, Erin L., Matchan 1, José Mangas 8, Antonio O. Gonçalves 9, José Manuel 9 1 School of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia 2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems and GEMOC, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia 3 Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4 Natural History Museum of Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain 5 Department Mineralogia, Petrologia i Geologia Aplicada, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain 6 School of Physical Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia 7 Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics, Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo 8 Department Física, Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus universitario de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain 9 Departament Geologia, Universidade Agostinho Neto, 815 Luanda, Angola *E-mail addresses: andrea.giuliani@unimelb.edu.au; andrea.giuliani@mq.edu.au; telephone: +61-3-83449094 1 ABSTRACT The origin of intraplate carbonatitic to alkaline volcanism in Africa is controversial. A tectonic control, i.e., decompression melting associated far-field stress, is suggested by correlation with lithospheric sutures, repeated magmatic cycles in the same areas over several Myr, synchronicity across the plate, and lack of clear age progression patterns. Conversely, a dominant role for mantle convection is supported by the coincidence of Cenozoic volcanism with regions of lithospheric uplift, positive free-air gravity anomalies and slow seismic velocities. To improve constraints on the genesis of African volcanism, here we report the first radiometric and isotopic results for the Catanda complex, which hosts the only extrusive carbonatites in Angola. Apatite (U-Th-Sm)/He and phlogopite 40Ar/39Ar ages of Catanda aillikite lavas indicate eruption at ~500–800 ka, >100 Ma after emplacement of abundant kimberlites and carbonatites in this region. The lavas share similar HIMU-like Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotope compositions with other young mantle-derived volcanics from Africa (e.g., Northern Kenya Rift; Cameroon Line). The position of the Catanda complex in the Lucapa corridor, a long-lived extensional structure, suggests a possible tectonic control for the volcanism. The complex is also located on the Bié Dome, a broad region of fast Pleistocene uplift attributed to mantle upwelling. Seismic tomography models indicate convection of deep hot material beneath regions of active volcanism in Africa including a large area encompassing Angola and northern Namibia. This is strong evidence that intraplate late-Cenozoic volcanism, including the Catanda complex, resulted from the interplay between mantle convection and pre-existing lithospheric heterogeneities. INTRODUCTION Cenozoic volcanism is widespread in Africa, with prominent examples such as the Eastern African Rift System (EARS), the Cameroon Line, Darfur, Hoggar, Tibesti and the Moroccan Atlas (Fig. 1) (e.g., Wilson and Guiraud, 1992; Burke, 1996; Ebinger and Sleep, 1998; Njome and de Wit, 2014). The magmatic products commonly derive from the mantle and range from carbonatitic and mafic alkaline to differentiated silica-rich magmas (e.g., Wilson and Guiraud, 1992; Bailey and Woolley, 2005). Most magmatic centers are located along suture zones between tectonic terranes (e.g., Thorpe and Smith, 1974). A profound lithospheric control on intraplate volcanism, whereby melts are generated by decompression-induced melting in (or below) the lithosphere due to extensional stress, is indicated by 1) association of volcanism with terrane, boundaries and/or thin lithosphere; 2) cyclicity of magmatic activity in the same regions over >100 Myr; 3) synchronicity across the African plate; and 4) absence of clear age progression patterns (Bailey and Woolley, 2005). The 2 only notable exceptions are Late Cretaceous and Paleogene alkaline volcanic centers in southern Namibia, possibly related to the passage of hot spots currently in the South Atlantic (Reid et al., 1990). Regions of active and recent volcanism coincide with some of the several swells (i.e., topographic highs) that characterize the surface morphology of the African continent (e.g., Burke, 1996). These zones are characterized by positive free-air gravity anomalies (e.g., Burke, 1996; Al-Hajri et al., 2009) and slow seismic velocities in the mantle (e.g., Forte et al., 2010; French and Romanowicz, 2015), suggesting that sublithospheric convection plays a significant role in sustaining the high topography of the swells and triggering intraplate volcanism (Fishwick and Bastow, 2011). With evidence for tectonic, lithospheric and convective controls, the ultimate trigger(s) of mantle-derived Cenozoic intraplate volcanism in Africa remains unresolved. To contribute to this discussion, we report the first geochronological and radiogenic isotope results for aillikite (i.e., carbonate-rich ultramafic lamprophyre) lavas from the Catanda volcanic complex in central Angola (Fig. 1 and Fig. DR1 inSupplementary Material). This complex also includes the only extrusive carbonatites documented in Angola to date (Campeny et al., 2014, 2015). The well-preserved volcanic morphology and ongoing hydrothermal activity in the Catanda area (i.e., small mud volcanoes and abundant travertine occurrences; Fig. DR2) suggest that volcanism is considerably younger than a nearby nephelinitic dyke which was dated at 92 ± 7 Ma by whole rock K-Ar dating (Torquato and Amaral, 1973). Catanda is located on the Bié Dome, along the NW margin of the Lucapa corridor(Fig. 1), a >1000 km-long NE-SW oriented graben structure. The corridor records magmatic (including kimberlites and intrusive carbonatites) and tectonic activity in the Neoproterozoic, Permo-Triassic and in the Cretaceous between 145 and 100 Ma (e.g., Allsopp and Hargraves, 1985; Jelsma et al., 2009, 2013). Earthquakes of magnitude up to 5.1 M (including three in the Catanda area between 1989 and 2014; https://earthquake.usgs.gov/) suggest ongoing tectonism in the corridor (Fig. DR3). The Bié Dome is a large plateau (~1000 km in diameter; ~2500 m of elevation) formed during major phases of uplift in the Oligocene and Pleistocene (including unusually fast (~2 mm/yr) uplift in the last 1 Myr), probably triggered and supported by mantle upwelling (Al-Hajri et al., 2009; Walker et al., 2016). Mantle convection models indeed show active upwelling beneath an area straddling Angola and northern Namibia (Forte et al., 2010). Several lines of geophysical evidence indicate that the Catanda area is underlain by thinner lithosphere (140 km) than inland Angola (>160 km; Fig. 1) (Globig et al., 2016). The Catanda complex therefore provides an excellent opportunity to test the possible 3 interplay between mantle convection and pre-existing lithospheric structures in the formation of intraplate magmas. GEOLOGICAL SETTING In the Lucapa corridor carbonatitic volcanism is restricted near the village of Catanda (Fig. 1). The Catanda complex consists of a cluster of small volcanic edifices with maar and tuff ring morphologies covering an area of 50 km2. The complex comprises pyroclastic rocks with subordinate calciocarbonatite, altered natrocarbonatite and aillikite lavas (Fig. DR1), which together form volcanic successions up to 100 m thick (Campeny et al., 2014, 2015). Fresh surface samples from three lava flows (AC-21, -24 and -25) in the Ungongué volcanic succession (Fig. DR1), whose petrography, mineral and bulk-rock compositions were reported by Campeny et al. (2015), were selected for this study. The samples exhibit a porphyritic texture and contain variable proportions of 0.5–2.0 mm-sized phenocrysts of fluorapatite, titanomagnetite, Ti-rich clinopyroxene, Ti-rich phlogopite partially altered to vermiculite, and serpentinised olivine in a calcite-rich groundmass (Fig. DR4). Based on their compositional and mineralogical features, these lavas are classified as aillikites. The lavas contain occasional glimmerite (i.e., phlogopite-dominated) xenoliths probably sourced from the lithospheric mantle. RESULTS Age Constraints Initial attempts to constrain the age of Catanda lavas by apatite U-Th-Pb and phlogopite RbSr dating did not provide conclusive results because of limited radiogenic ingrowth (see Supplementary Material). Robust age constraints are provided by (U-Th-Sm)/He (AHe) dating of nine apatite aliquots from lavas AC-21 and 25. Given the expected young age (and low 4He content) of the apatite grains, most of the AHe analyses were carried out on multigrain samples (see Methods in Supplementary Material), which yield weighted (U-ThSm)/He ages of 640 ± 130 ka and 650 ± 90 ka (uncertainties at 95% confidence level) for samples AC-21 and -25, respectively (Table 1). 40Ar/39Ar dating of phlogopite grains (see Tables DR4-DR6 and Methods) from samples AC-24 and -25 yield similarly young results, which were pooled to produce an inverse isochron age of 558 ± 22 ka (2σ; n = 6; Fig. 2). By contrast, phlogopite grains from sample AC-21 yield generally older apparent ages across all heating steps, and produce a weighted 4 mean age of 741 ± 44 ka calculated by pooling concordant 40Ar*/39Ar results from the five analyzed grains (Fig. DR5). The corresponding inverse isochron for these data (Fig. 2) yields an age of 776 ± 81 ka. Although the age difference between samples AC-21 and 24/25 is statistically significant, partial alteration of phlogopite to vermiculite, coupled with the possible occurrence of mica xenocrysts (as suggested by glimmerite xenoliths) in Catanda lavas warrant cautious treatment of these results. Nevertheless, the phlogopite 40Ar/39Ar ages overlap with the apatite AHe ages, and support a Middle Pleistocene age for the volcanism. Radiogenic Isotopes Clinopyroxene, apatite and groundmass fractions of the Catanda lavas have high 206Pb/204Pb (>20), low 87Sr/86Sr (0.7035), and moderately high 143Nd/144Nd (0.51278– 0.51286), reminiscent of HIMU-type ocean island basalts (OIB) such as St. Helena (Fig. 3, Figure DR6 and Table DR1). Isotopic compositions transitional between the HIMU and ‘enriched’ mantle (EM) components, are also found in other Cenozoic mantle-derived volcanic suites across the African continent (e.g., EARS carbonatites from the Northern Kenya Rift, Cameroon Line volcanics, Western Cape olivine melilitites; Fig. 3). We therefore suggest that aillikite (and carbonatite) magmas at Catanda represent a further example of mantle-derived, HIMU-like magmatism in Africa. A mantle origin is also supported by C isotope data for Catanda carbonates (Campeny et al., 2015). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The young (~500–800 ka) radiometric age of the Catanda lavas is consistent with other evidence for recent volcanic and geothermal activity in the Catanda area, including wellpreserved volcanic landforms and ongoing hydrothermal activity (Fig. DR2). These observations imply a recent resumption of volcanic activity in western Angola, some 90 Ma after emplacement of mafic alkaline mafic dykes in the area (Torquato and Amaral, 1973; Marzoli et al., 1999). The position of the Catanda complex in the Lucapa corridor suggests that the local lithospheric architecture facilitated melt ascent to the surface. Recent seismic activity (Fig. DR3) might support a tectonic trigger (i.e., far-field stress) for volcanism. However, the rapid Pleistocene uplift (Walker et al., 2016), the occurrence of positive free-air gravity anomalies (Fig. 1), seismic tomography and mantle convection models (Forte et al., 2010; French and Romanowicz, 2015), all support active mantle upwelling beneath the area and make unlikely a purely tectonic trigger for mantle-derived 5 magmatism. Seismic tomography models (e.g., Ritsema et al., 1999; Forte et al., 2010; French and Romanowicz, 2015) suggest that a large dome of mantle material with slow seismic velocities, sourced from the core-mantle boundary beneath central-southern Africa (termed the “South African Superplume”) ascends beneath the Kalahari and Congo cratons and splits into multiple branches once it reaches the upper mantle. The larger eastern branches of this deep structure feed the EARS, whereas the smaller western branches upwell beneath the Cameroon Line and a large area beneath northern Namibia and centralsouthern Angola, where Catanda is located. We speculate that rapid uplift of the Bié Dome and attendant Catanda carbonatitic-aillikitic volcanism in the Pleistocene might be related to a finger-like structure stemming from a branch of the South African Superplume that is upwelling beneath southwestern Africa. The recent global seismic tomography model of French and Romanowicz (2015, their Extended Fig. 3a) indeed shows a narrow structure with low surface-wave velocity beneath central Angola, which is connected to the top of a larger upwelling. A similar model was proposed to explain volcanism in the northern part of the EARS (Civiero et al., 2015) and Cenozoic intraplate magmatism in 500 km-large zones of localized uplift across Europe (e.g., Wilson and Patterson, 2001). Thinned lithosphere beneath the Lucapa corridor and especially its western sector (Fig. 1) would provide a preferential pathway for focusing mantle upwelling as previously proposed by Fishwick and Bastow (2011) for other intraplate volcanic regions in northern Africa (e.g., Hoggar, Tibesti; Fig. 1). Late Cretaceous mantle upwelling activity is suggested by mafic alkaline rocks with trace element and Sr isotope affinity to the St Helena OIBs (and similar 87Sr/86Sr values to the Catanda lavas), which emplaced at 90–95 Ma along the central Angolan margin (Fig. 1) (Marzoli et al., 1999). Similar Sr-Nd isotope compositions for Catanda lavas, the 116–133 Ma Lunda Norte kimberlites (Castillo-Oliver et al., 2016) and Cretaceous carbonatites (Alberti et al., 1999) in the Lucapa corridor (Fig. 1) may indicate that Cretaceous kimberlites and carbonatites, and Pleistocene Catanda carbonatite-aillikite magmas have tapped similar (convective) mantle sources. While the Catanda complex and other expressions of late Cenozoic intraplate volcanism in Africa (e.g., EARS, Cameroon Line, Darfur, Hoggar, Tibesti, Moroccan Atlas) correlate with pre-existing lithospheric discontinuities, they also show evidence of being affected by active mantle upwelling. We therefore argue that intraplate carbonatitic and alkaline magmatism result from the complex interplay between multi-scale mantle convection and pre-existing lithospheric structures, as previously proposed for Cenozoic volcanism in the North China Craton (Guo et al., 2016), rather than being controlled by tectonic processes alone (e.g., continental break-up, changes in direction and speed of plate motion). We recognize that current models of mantle convection do not readily explain the recurrence 6 of volcanism in specific areas of Africa over >100 Myr, for example in the Rungwe zone of the EARS (Bailey and Woolley, 2005), in the continental sector of the Cameroon Line (Njome and de Wit, 2014) and in the Lucapa corridor (this study). Future models of mantle dynamics will need to incorporate these observations to address the question of whether upwelling of asthenospheric material can be the main driver of intraplate carbonatitic and alkaline magmatism in Africa and elsewhere. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the consolidated research group SGR-444 and -1661 of the Catalonia Government, the Spanish Government (research project n. CGL2009–13758), the Society of Economic Geologists (Hugh E. McKinstry fund), and the Australian Research Council (DE150100009 to AG,DP130100257 to VSK and DP160103502 to JCA). We thank José Fortuna and Felipe Correia from Catanda village for their assistance during field-work; Mark Kendrick, David Phillips and Gareth Davies for informal reviews of an earlier version of this manuscript; and Louis Moresi, Ting Yang and Mike Sandiford for insightful discussions. This manuscript was significantly improved by constructive reviews from Cynthia Ebinger, Phil Janney and an anonymous reviewer, and the encouraging and helpful editorial handling of Dennis Brown. REFERENCES CITED Al-Hajri, Y., White, N., and Fishwick, S., 2009, Scales of transient convective support beneath Africa: Geology, v. 37, p. 883–886. Alberti, A., Castorina, F., Censi, P., Comin-Chiaramonti, P., and Gomes, C.B., 1999, Geochemical characteristics of Cretaceous carbonatites from Angola: Journal of African Earth Sciences, v. 29, p. 735–759, doi:10.1016/S0899-5362(99)00127-X. Allsopp, H.L., and Hargraves, R.B., 1985, Rb-Sr ages and palaeomagnetic data for some Angolan alkaline intrusives: Transactions - Geological Society of South Africa, v. 88, p. 295– 299. Amante, C., and Eakins, B.W., 2009, ETOPO1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis.: NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. 7 Bailey, D.K., and Woolley, A.R., 2005, Repeated, synchronous magmatism within Africa: Timing, magnetic reversals, and global tectonics: Geological Society of America. Special Paper, v. 388, p. 365–377. Bell, K., and Tilton, G.R., 2001, Nd, Pb and Sr Isotopic Compositions of East African Carbonatites: Evidence for Mantle Mixing and Plume Inhomogeneity: Journal of Petrology, v. 42, p. 1927–1945, doi:10.1093/petrology/42.10.1927. Burke, K., 1996, The African Plate: South African Journal of Geology, v. 99, p. 341–409. Campeny, M., Kamenetsky, V.S., Melgarejo, J.C., Mangas, J., Manuel, J., Alfonso, P., Kamenetsky, M.B., Bambi, A.C.J.M., and Gonçalves, A.O., 2015, Carbonatitic lavas in Catanda (Kwanza Sul, Angola): Mineralogical and geochemical constraints on the parental melt: Lithos, v. 232, p. 1–11, doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2015.06.016. Campeny, M., Mangas, J., Melgarejo, J.C., Bambi, A., Alfonso, P., Gernon, T., and Manuel, J., 2014, The Catanda extrusive carbonatites (Kwanza Sul, Angola): An example of explosive carbonatitic volcanism: Bulletin of Volcanology, v. 76, p. 818, doi:10.1007/s00445-0140818-6. Castillo-Oliver, M., Galí, S., Melgarejo, J.C., Griffin, W.L., Belousova, E., Pearson, N.J., Watangua, M., and O’Reilly, S.Y., 2016, Trace-element geochemistry and U–Pb dating of perovskite in kimberlites of the Lunda Norte province (NE Angola): Petrogenetic and tectonic implications: Chemical Geology, v. 426, p. 118–134, doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.12.014. Chorowicz, J., 2005, The East African rift system: Journal of African Earth Sciences, v. 43, p. 379–410, doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.019. Civiero, C., Hammond, J.O.S., Goes, S., Fishwick, S., Ahmed, A., Ayele, A., Doubre, C., Goitom, B., Keir, D., Kendall, J.M., Leroy, S., Ogubazghi, G., Rümpker, G., and Stuart, G.W., 2015, Multiple mantle upwellings in the transition zone beneath the northern East-African Rift system from relative P-wave travel-time tomography: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v. 16, p. 2949–2968, doi:10.1002/2015GC005948. Ebinger, C.J., and Sleep, N.H., 1998, Cenozoic magmatism throughout east Africa resulting from impact of a single plume: Nature, v. 395, p. 788–791, doi:10.1038/27417. 8 Fishwick, S., and Bastow, I. D., 2011, Towards a better understanding of African topography: a review of passive-source seismic studies of the African crust and upper mantle: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 357, p. 343-371, doi:10.1144/SP357.19 Forte, A.M., Quéré, S., Moucha, R., Simmons, N.A., Grand, S.P., Mitrovica, J.X., and Rowley, D.B., 2010, Joint seismic–geodynamic-mineral physical modelling of African geodynamics: A reconciliation of deep-mantle convection with surface geophysical constraints: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 295, p. 329–341, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2010.03.017. French, S.W., and Romanowicz, B., 2015, Broad plumes rooted at the base of the Earth’s mantle beneath major hotspots: Nature, v. 525, p. 95–99, doi:10.1038/nature14876. Globig, J., Fernàndez, M., Torne, M., Vergés, J., Robert, A., and Faccenna, C., 2016, New insights into the crust and lithospheric mantle structure of Africa from elevation, geoid, and thermal analysis: Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth, v. 121, p. 5389–5424, doi:10.1002/2016JB012972. Guo, Z., Afonso, J.C., Qashqai, M.T., Yang, Y., and Chen, Y.J., 2016, Thermochemical structure of the North China Craton from multi-observable probabilistic inversion: Extent and causes of cratonic lithosphere modification: Gondwana Research, v. 37, p. 252–265, doi:10.1016/j.gr.2016.07.002. Janney, P.E., Le Roex, A.P., Carlson, R.W., and Viljoen, K.S., 2002, A Chemical and MultiIsotope Study of the Western Cape Olivine Melilitite Province, South Africa: Implications for the Sources of Kimberlites and the Origin of the HIMU Signature in Africa: Journal of Petrology, v. 43, p. 2339–2370, doi:10.1093/petrology/43.12.2339. Jelsma, H., Barnett, W., Richards, S., and Lister, G., 2009, Tectonic setting of kimberlites: Lithos, v. 112, p. 155–165, doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2009.06.030. Jelsma, H., Krishnan, U., Perritt, S., Preston, R., Winter, F., Lemotlo, L., van der Linde, G., Armstrong, R., Phillips, D., Joy, S., Costa, J., Facatino, M., Posser, A., Kumar, M., Wallace, C., Chinn, I., and Henning, A., 2013, Kimberlites from Central Angola: A Case Study of Exploration Findings, in Pearson, D. G., et al., eds., Proceedings of 10th International Kimberlite Conference: Volume 2: New Delhi, Springer India, p. 173–190. 9 Lee, D.-C., Halliday, A.N., Fitton, J.G., and Poli, G., 1994, Isotopic variations with distance and time in the volcanic islands of the Cameroon line: Evidence for a mantle plume origin: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 123, p. 119–138, doi:10.1016/0012-821X(94)90262-3. Marzoli, A., Melluso, L., Morra, V., Renne, P.R., Sgrosso, I., D’Antonio, M., Duarte Morais, L., Morais, E.A.A., and Ricci, G., 1999, Geochronology and petrology of Cretaceous basaltic magmatism in the Kwanza basin (western Angola), and relationships with the ParanàEtendeka continental flood basalt province: Journal of Geodynamics, v. 28, p. 341–356, doi:10.1016/S0264-3707(99)00014-9. Njome, M.S., and de Wit, M.J., 2014, The Cameroon Line: Analysis of an intraplate magmatic province transecting both oceanic and continental lithospheres: Constraints, controversies and models: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 139, p. 168–194, doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.09.003. Reid, D.L., Cooper, A.F., Rex, D.C., and Harmer, R.E., 1990, Timing of post–Karoo alkaline volcanism in southern Namibia: Geological Magazine, v. 127, p. 427–433, doi:10.1017/S001675680001517X. Ritsema, J., van Heijst, H.J., and Woodhouse, J.H., 1999, Complex Shear Wave Velocity Structure Imaged Beneath Africa and Iceland: Science, v. 286, p. 1925–1928, doi:10.1126/science.286.5446.1925. Stracke, A., 2012, Earth’s heterogeneous mantle: A product of convection-driven interaction between crust and mantle: Chemical Geology, v. 330–331, p. 274–299, doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.08.007. Thorpe, R.S., and Smith, K., 1974, Distribution of Cenozoic volcanism in Africa: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 22, p. 91–95, doi:10.1016/0012-821X(74)90068-5. Torquato, J.R., and Amaral, G., 1973, Algumas idades K/Ar do magmatismo mesozoico de Angola e sua correlação com o correspondente do sul do Brasil: Boletim do Instituto de Investigacão Científica de Angola, v. 10, p. 31–38. Walker, R.T., Telfer, M., Kahle, R.L., Dee, M.W., Kahle, B., Schwenninger, J.L., Sloan, R.A., and Watts, A.B., 2016, Rapid mantle-driven uplift along the Angolan margin in the late Quaternary: Nature Geoscience, v. 9, p. 909–914, doi:10.1038/ngeo2835. 10 Wilson, M., and Guiraud, R., 1992, Magmatism and rifting in Western and Central Africa, from Late Jurassic to Recent times: Tectonophysics, v. 213, p. 203–225, doi:10.1016/00401951(92)90259-9. Wilson, M., and Patterson, R., 2001, Intraplate magmatism related to short-wavelength convective instabilities in the upper mantle: Evidence from the Tertiary-Quaternary volcanic province of Western and Central Europe: Geological Society of America. Special Paper, v. 352, p. 37–58. FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1. Elevation map of the African plate from the ETOPO1 global model (Amante and Eakins, 2009) showing major tectonic and volcanic features. Major structural features of the East Africa Rift System (EARS) are from Chorowicz (2005). Inset shows location of the Catanda Complex, Lucapa Corridor, Kwanza seamounts, and major Triassic and Cretaceous kimberlite, carbonatite and alkali basalt occurrences (Marzoli et al., 1999; Jelsma et al., 2013; Castillo-Oliver et al., 2016). Grey shaded area indicates free-air, crust-corrected positive gravity anomaly above 15 mGal (after Forte et al., 2010). Lithospheric thickness estimates (dashed red lines) are from Globig et al. (2016). Figure 2. 40Ar/39Ar phlogopite inverse isochrons for Catanda lavas. The chart includes the inverse isochrons for data combined from samples AC-24 and AC-25 (blue symbols),assuming a J-value of 0.00104689 ± 0.037% (AC-25-PHL value); and for AC-21 results with concordant 40Ar*/39Ar ratios (red symbols; J-value of 0.000105030 ± 0.036%). Rejected steps (i.e., low-T heating steps from grain AC-21PHL-1) are shown in gray in the inset. Figure 3. (a) 87Sr/86Sr vs 143Nd/144Nd, and (b) 206Pb/204Pb vs 87Sr/86Sr compositions of Catanda lavas compared to East Africa Rift System (EARS) carbonatites from the Northern and Southern Kenya Rifts (NKR, SKR) (Bell and Tilton, 2001), lavas from the Cameroon Line (Lee et al., 1994), Western Cape melilitites (Janney et al., 2002), HIMU OIB lavas from St Helena and enriched-mantle (EM) OIB end-members (Stracke, 2012). The following solution-mode multi-collector ICP-MS analyses are reported in each panel: (a) clinopyroxene (3 analyses), apatite (3); and (b) apatite (1), combined groundmass (Pb isotopes) and clinopyroxene (Sr isotopes) from the same sample (3). 11 1GSA Data Repository item 2017xxx, xxxxxxxx, is available online at http://www.geosociety.org/datarepository/2017/ or on request from editing@geosociety.org TABLE 1. (U-TH-SM)/HE AGES OF APATITE GRAINS IN SAMPLES AC-21 AND -25 FROM THE CATANDA COMPLEX Sample 4He (ncc) Th/U AC-21_1 0.047 11.86 690 ± 40 AC-21_2 0.078 12.88 890 ± 50 AC-21_3 0.166 12.26 580 ± 30 AC-21_4 0.208 13.29 570 ± 30 AC-21_5 0.035 15.75 650 ± 40 *Mean 64 ± 130 AC-25_1 0.017 AC-25_2 0.044 AC-25_3 0.075 AC-25_4 0.029 AC-25_5 0.068 *Mean 650 ± 90 13.34 8.82 11.60 11.39 11.35 640 ± 40 †1330 ± 80 630 ± 40 760 ± 50 620 ± 40 Notes: *Weighted mean age calculated at 95% c.i. †Analysis excluded from calculation of weighted mean age. Between 1 and 7 grains were analyzed for each sample. See Supplementary Material for further information 12 Figure 1 13 Figure 2 14 Figure 3 15 Supplementary Material for GSA Data Repository SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES Figure DR1 Supplementary figure DR1. Schematised geological map of Angola and the Catanda volcanic area and detailed volcano-stratigraphic succession of the Ungongué succession (modified from Campeny et al., 2014 Lithos). The location of the volcanic flows examined in this study is also included. 16 Figure DR2 Supplementary figure DR2. Surface features of the Catanda volcanic complex. (a), (b) Wellpreserved morphology of the eruptive centres (volcanic cones, maars – see dotted lines). (c) Travertine deposits up to 30 m thick, associated with present-day hydrothermal systems in the Catanda area. (d) Products of recent, small-scale carbonate mud (mini-) eruption. 17 Figure DR3 Supplementary figure DR3. Elevation map of Angola from the ETOPO1 global model (Amante and Eakins, 2009) showing the location of historical eartquakes (i.e after 1900) of magnitude above 2.5M (source https://earthquake.usgs.gov/). The approximate boundaries of the Lucapa corridor are also shown. Grey shaded area indicates free-air, crust-corrected positive gravity anomaly above 15 mGal (after Forte et al., 2010). Lithospheric thickness estimates (dashed red lines) are from Globig et al. (2016). 18 Figure DR4 Supplementary figure DR4. Outcrop, hand specimen and petrographic images of Catanda carbonatitic-aillikitic lavas. (a) Photograph of lava flow in the upper part of the Ungongué succession; (b) porphyritic sample of lava from the Ungongué volcanic sequence; (c), (d) transmittedlight photomicrographs of porphyritic lavas with apatite (ap) and spinel (sp) micro-phenocrysts hosted in a groundmass dominated by calcite (cal); (e), (f) scanning electron microscope (SEM), backscattered electron (BSE) images of lava groundmass, which contains apatite (ap), perovskite (prv), calcite (cal), brucite (bru) and accessory euhedral crystals of pyrochlore (pcl). 19 Figure DR5 Supplementary figure DR5. 40Ar/39Ar phlogopite age spectrum for grain 21PHL-1. 20 Figure DR6 0.5131 0.5130 0.2831 a 143Nd/144Nd St Helena 0.5129 0.2830 Cameroon Line 0.5128 b 176Hf/177Hf EARS carb - SKR 0.2829 EARS carb - NKR 0.5127 Western Cape 0.5126 0.2828 Catanda EM1 0.5125 EM2 0.2827 EM2 EM1 0.5124 206Pb/204Pb 0.5123 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 0.2826 0.5123 21.0 0.2831 0.5127 0.2831 c 176Hf/177Hf 0.5125 143Nd/144Nd 0.5131 d St Helena 176Hf/177Hf 0.2830 0.5129 Cameroon Line 0.2830 Western Cape 0.2829 Catanda 0.2829 EM2 0.2828 EM2 0.2828 0.2827 0.2827 EM1 EM1 206Pb/204Pb 87Sr/86Sr 0.2826 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 0.2826 0.7025 0.7030 0.7035 0.7040 0.7045 0.7050 0.7055 0.7060 21.0 15.9 41.0 e 207Pb/204Pb 15.8 15.7 St Helena Cameroon Line EARS carb - SKR EARS carb - NKR Western Cape Catanda 40.5 40.0 EM2 15.6 15.5 f 208Pb/204Pb 39.5 EM2 39.0 EM1 EM1 206Pb/204Pb 15.4 206Pb/204Pb 38.5 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 Supplementary figure DR6. Radiogenic isotope compositions of Catanda lavas (additional charts). The Catanda values are compared to the isotopic compositions of Eastern Africa Rift System (EARS) carbonatites from the Northern and Southern Kenya Rifts (NKR, SKR) (Bell and Tilton, 2001 J Petrol), lavas from the Cameroon Line (Lee et al., 1994 EPSL; Ballentine et al., 1997 Chem Geol), Western Cape melilitites (Janney et al., 2002 J Petrol), HIMU OIB lavas from St Helena (Stracke, 2012 Chem Geol), and enriched-mantle (EM) OIB end-members represented by the most extreme compositions of lavas from Pitcairn (EM-1) and Samoa (EM-2) (Stracke, 2012). The following solution-mode multicollector ICP-MS analyses are reported in each panel: (a, e, f) bulk groundmass (3 analyses), apatite (1); (b) groundmass (3) and clinopyroxene (1); (c) groundmass (3); (d) clinopyroxene (2). In (c), the terrestrial array is from Vervoort et al. (2011 GCA). 21 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Methods Apatite AHe dating (U-Th-Sm)/He (AHe) dating was carried out at the University of Melbourne. Apatite was handpicked under a binocular microscope, immersed in ethanol and examined under polarised light to select the most suitable grains (with the least number of mineral impurities). AHe dating is usually performed on clear, euhedral, unfractured grains, but the Catanda apatites are markedly anhedral and fractured. This precludes accurate estimates of grain geometry required for α-ejection corrections (Farley et al., 1996). The selected grains were thus mechanically abraded using silicon carbide grit (300-425 µm) in a Krogh (1982)-style abrasion cell to remove the outer ~25-30 µm (i.e. greater than the typical α-ejection distance) of the grains (e.g., Spiegel et al., 2009). The process was halted periodically to monitor abrasion progress. Abrasion of the grain periphery eliminates consideration of issues related to change of radiogenic 4He concentrations by α-ejection or α-implantation. Therefore, following removal of at least ~20 m there is no the need to apply ejection corrections, which can be considered close to unity in rapidly cooled samples (Min et al., 2006). Abraded apatite grains were transferred to small Pt-capsules and outgassed under vacuum at ~900˚C for 5 minutes, using a semiconductor diode Coherent Quattro FAP laser (820 nm) with fibre-optic coupling to the sample chamber to provide optimal coupling with samples and heating without melting, ablation or fusion. 4He contents were determined by isotope dilution with a pure 3He spike, using a Balzers QMS 200–Prisma quadrupole mass spectrometer. A hot blank was run after each gas extraction to verify complete outgassing of the apatite grains. Most samples yielded negligible amounts of gas after the first reextraction, and for all samples a second re-extraction invariably contributed <0.5% of the total measured 4He. Following the He outgassing step, the apatite grains were dissolved (within their Pt capsules) in HNO3 for determination of U-Th-Sm concentrations using an Agilent 7700x ICPMS. USGS basalt BCR-2 was used as primary standard. Total uncertainty in measured 4He/(U+Th+Sm) for abraded apatite is 3% (±1). USGS basalt BHVO-2 and Durango apatite were analysed to monitor data quality for U-Th-Sm concentrations and AHe ages, respectively. The results obtained for BHVO-2 are consistent with the 5-year averages (Sm 6075 ppb [± 0.5%; ± 1sd], U 424 ppb [± 0.36%], Th 1209 ppb [± 0.35%]; n=124), while four 22 AHe ages of Durango apatite acquired with the Catanda samples average 31.2 ± 1.0 Ma (± 2Table A2), consistent with an AHe age of 31.02 ± 1.01 Ma for a set of 24 Durango apatite determined at the Caltech He laboratory (McDowell et al., 2005). Phlogopite 40Ar/39Ar dating The Catanda carbonatites are not ideal candidates for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology given the common alteration of phlogopite to vermiculite (Tauler et al., 2014) and the presence of glimmerite xenoliths and xenocrystic micas in the studied samples. As an exploratory exercise to determine whether any meaningful 40Ar/39Ar age information could be extracted from the samples, a small number of apparently microphenocrystic phlogopite grains from lava samples AC-21, -24 and -25 were selected under binocular microscope for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. The AC-21 grains appeared to be pervasively altered to vermiculite, but the least altered grains were selected for this study. Following soaking in 5% HNO3, rinsing in water and then acetone, the samples were wrapped in aluminium foil packets, stacked in a quartz-glass vial along with fluence monitor Alder Creek Rhyolite sanidine (1.18144 ± 0.00068 Ma, Phillips et al., 2017) and irradiated in the CLICIT facility at the Oregon State University TRIGA reactor for 0.4 MWhr (UM#61). The 40Ar/39Ar analyses were undertaken in the Noble Gas laboratory at the University of Melbourne, using a multi-collector Thermo Fisher Scientific ARGUSVI mass spectrometer linked to a stainless steel gas extraction/purification line and a Photon Machines Fusions 10.6 CO2 laser system (e.g., Phillips and Matchan, 2013). Single-grain step heating analyses were performed on the AC-21 phlogopite grains (n = 5). In the case of samples AC24 and -25, grains were combined for analysis due to small sample size (two aliquots for AC24, one for AC-25). Grains were heated using a 6 mm homogenized laser beam over a range of 3–30% laser power, following initial outgassing at 0.5% laser power to remove adsorbed gas. Due to the short irradiation time, it was not feasible to include Ca/K/Cl salts/glasses in the same package as the samples. Therefore, correction factors determined for K-glass and Ca-salts contained in package irradiated close in time in the CLICIT facility were used. These are the employed interference correction values: (36Ar/37Ar)Ca = 2.570 (± 0.002) x 10-4; (39Ar/37Ar)Ca = 6.62 (± 0.08) x 10-4; (40Ar/39Ar)K = 0.001210 (± 0.000016). Age spectra and inverse isochron diagrams were generated using ISOPLOT/Ex.3.75 (Ludwig, 2012). Plateau ages are defined as including at least 60% of the 39Ar, distributed over a minimum of three 23 contiguous steps and with 40Ar/39Ar ratios within agreement of the mean at the 95% confidence level (e.g., Lanphere and Dalrymple, 1978). An atmospheric (40Ar/36Ar)i value of 298.56 ± 0.62 (Lee et al., 2006) is assumed. Phlogopite Rb-Sr dating and Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb isotope analyses Rb-Sr isotope dilution data for phlogopite, as well as Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb isotope data for apatite, clinopyroxene and groundmass samples were acquired using multi-collector ICP-MS at the University of Melbourne (e.g. Maas et al., 2015; Giuliani et al., 2015). Phlogopite grains were leached with 0.5M HNO3 (40oC, 2 min) or 2M HNO3 (40oC, 2 mins) to gently remove easily soluble Sr-rich impurities and generate higher Rb/Sr ratios in the residual phlogopite (Brown et al., 1989; Maas, 2003). The residues were dissolved on a hot plate (3:1 HF-HNO3, 6M HCl). The resulting solutions, and the 2M HNO3 leachates for each of the three phlogopite samples, were equilibrated with a 85Rb-84Sr tracer, followed by extraction of Rb and Sr using cation exchange and Eichrom Sr resin. Apatite was cleaned with hot water and dissolved with 5M HNO3, while clinopyroxene (cleaned with hot 2M HNO3) and chips of groundmass material were dissolved with 3:1 HF-HNO3 and 6M HCl. Small splits of each solution were reserved for trace element analyses on an Agilent 7700x quadrupole ICPMS; the remaining solution was used to extract Pb, Sr, Nd and Hf as required. Isotopic analyses were carried out on a Nu Plasma multi-collector ICP-MS. Mass bias in unspiked Sr, Nd and Hf isotope analyses was corrected by internal normalization to 86Sr/88Sr = 0.1194, 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219 and 179Hf/177Hf = 0.7325 using the exponential law; final data are reported relative to SRM987 = 0.71023, La Jolla Nd = 0.511860 and JMC475 = 0.282160 and have internal precisions (2se) of ±0.000020, ±0.000010 and ±0.000008, respectively. External precision (2sd) is ±0.00004 (Sr), ±0.000020 (Nd), ±0.000015 (Hf). Mass bias in Pb isotope analyses was corrected by thallium-doping (Woodhead, 2002; SRM981 is assumed to have 206Pb/204Pb = 16.935, 207Pb/204Pb = 15.489 and 208Pb/204Pb = 36.701) and corrected ratios have external precisions of ±0.04-0.09% (2sd). Results for USGS basalt BCR-2 acquired at the time the Catanda samples were analysed average 87Sr/88Sr = 0.705004 ± 39 (n=10), 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512644 ± 24 (n=11), 176Hf/177Hf = 0.282878 ± 13 (n=9), 206Pb/204Pb = 18.759 ± 0.039%, 207Pb/204Pb = 15.621 ± 0.064% and 208Pb/204Pb = 38.730 ± 0.087% (2sd, n = 22; BCR-2 not acid-leached); the JNd-1 Nd standard averaged 0.512115 ± 11 (n = 12). These results are consistent with TIMS and MC-ICPMS reference values. 24 87Rb/86Sr obtained by isotope dilution (for phlogopite residues and leachates) have an external precision of ±0.5% (2sd). Rb-Sr isotope data for several standards (e.g., SRM607 feldspar, GLO-1 glauconite) are consistent with reference values. Likewise, biotite and hornblende from Mt Dromedary monzonite (the source of the GA-1550 and MD-2 reference biotites) produce a model isochron age of 98.63 ± 0.58 Ma (using the 87Rb decay constant of Villa et al., 2015), within error of biotite 40Ar-39Ar age constraints (Renne et al., 1998; Spell and McDougall, 2003; Phillips et al., 2017). Parent-daughter ratios for apatite, clinopyroxene and groundmass were calculated from trace element concentrations measured for splits of the sample solutions (see above) and are assigned uncertainties of ±2% (2sd), based on the long-term reproducibility of standard rocks analysed on the same instrument. Modern CHUR is assumed to have 147Sm/144Nd = 0.196, 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512632 176Lu/177Hf = 0.0336 and 176Hf/177Hf = 0.282785 (Bouvier et al., 2008). Additional results Rb/Sr dating of Catanda phlogopite Preliminary trace element data for phlogopite phenocrysts in samples AC-21, -24 and -25 indicate high Sr contents (2000-4000 ppm) and Rb/Sr<1, presumably related to Sr-rich impurities (apatite, carbonate). Mild acid leaching, employed to remove easily soluble impurities, reduced Sr contents to 115-227 ppm and raised Rb/Sr to 1.8-4.5 (87Rb/86Sr = 5.16– 12.95; Table A2). The analysed leachates (2M HNO3) have lower Rb/Sr ratios (0.050.28, 87Rb/86Sr = 0.13–0.81). Despite the dispersion in Rb/Sr, measured 87Sr/86Sr in the phlogopite residues is low and relatively uniform (0.70331-0.70397; Table A2). The leachates (0.70346-0.70348; Table A2) and apatite and clinopyroxene phenocrysts from the same samples (0.70309-0.70354; Table A1) have similar present-day 87Sr/86Sr. In the Rb-Sr isochron diagram (not shown), the data do not define linear arrays. This suggests that the RbSr systems are very young. 40Ar/39Ar dating of Catanda phlogopite Results are summarised below with the full dataset located in Tables A4-A6 A summary of age results is provided in Table A5. Uncertainties are stated at the 2σ level unless otherwise specified. Although samples were too small to measure 37Ar precisely, this has a negligible impact on the results given the large error on apparent age calculations resulting from extremely low 40Ar* yields. For this reason, we prefer not to correct for Ca-induced 25 interferences (see Table A4 for both versions of the dataset). The large uncertainties in 40Ar*/39Ar ratios (Table A4) are due to extremely small 39Ar contents (small sample size), and high levels of atmospheric argon in the samples. Phlogopite grains from samples AC-24 and AC-25 yield similar argon isotopic data, with atmospheric argon dominating the 40Ar signal (40Ar* ≤ 17% of total 40Ar; Table A4). Mid- to high-temperature heating steps with meaningful 39Ar measurements (>1 fA 39Ar; n = 6) yield apparent ages ranging from 582 ± 26 ka (24PHL-1, step 2) to 1.35 ± 0.23 Ma (24PHL-2, step 2). These data (n = 6) are combined for inverse isochron analysis (J-values overlap at the 1σ-level), revealing the presence of a small amount of excess argon ((40Ar/36Ar)i = 302.01±0.88; MSWD = 0.5, p = 0.73) and an inverse isochron age of 558 ± 22 ka (Fig. A4a). In comparison, the AC-21 grains yield older apparent ages across all heating steps and exhibit higher levels of atmospheric argon contamination (40Ar* ≤ 3% of total 40Ar). A weighted mean age of 741 ± 44 ka (MSWD = 1.4, p = 0.22) is calculated by pooling the concordant 40Ar*/39Ar values (n = 7) from all five AC-21 grains. The corresponding inverse isochron (Fig. A4b) yields an age of 776 ± 81 ka, with an atmospheric (40Ar/36Ar)i value of 298.18 ± 0.75. The age spectrum for 21PHL-1 subtly increases with increasing temperature, ranging from 520 ± 210 to 780 ± 160 ka, suggesting that this sample may have experienced 40Ar* loss but the large analytical uncertainties (13–40%; 2σ) preclude any further comment. A plateau age of 690 ± 63 ka (MSWD=1.5 p=0.19, 84% of 39Ar; Fig. A4c). References Bouvier, A., Vervoort, J., Patchett, J.P., 2008. The Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd isotopic composition of CHUR: Constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 272, 48-57. Brown, R.W., Allsopp, H.I., Bristow, J.W., Smith, C.B., 1989. Improved precision of Rb-Sr dating of kimberlitic micas: An assessment of a leaching technique. Chemical Geology 79, 125-136. Farley, K.A., Wolf, R.A., Silver, L.T., 1996. The effects of long alpha-stopping distances on (U-Th)/He ages. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 60, 4223-4229. Giuliani, A., Phillips, D., Woodhead, J.D., Kamenetsky, V.S., Fiorentini, M.L., Maas, R., Soltys, A., Armstrong, R.S., 2015. Did diamond-bearing orangeites originate from MARID-veined peridotites in the lithospheric mantle? Nature Communications 6:6837 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7837. 26 Krogh, T.E., 1982. Improved accuracy of U-Pb zircon ages by the creation of more concordant systems using an air abrasion technique. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 46, 637-649. Lanphere, M.A., Dalrymple, G.B., 1978. The use of 40Ar/39Ar data in evaluation of disturbed K-Ar systems, Open-File Report VL. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report. Lee, J.-Y., Marti, K., Severinghaus, J., Kawamura, K., Yoo, S.-S., Lee, J., Kim, J., 2006. A redetermination of the isotopic abundances of atmospheric Ar. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70, 4507–4512. Ludwig, K.R., 2012. User’s Manual for Isoplot 3.75: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication No. 6, 75 p. Maas, R., 2003. Acid leaching of micas: improved Rb-Sr geochronology of disequilibrated rocks from zones of alteration and deformation. Journal of the Virtual Explorer 13, doi: 10.3809/jvirtex.2003.00085. Maas, R., Grew, E.S., Carson, C.J., 2015. Isotopic constraints (Pb, Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd) on the sources of Early Cambrian pegmatites with boron and beryllium minerals in the Larseman Hills, Prydz Bay, Antarctica. The Canadian Mineralogist 53, 249-272. McDowell, F.W., McIntosh, W.C., Farley, K.A., 2005. A precise 40Ar-39Ar reference age for the Durango apatite (U-Th)/He and fission-track dating standard. Chemical Geology 214, 249-263. Min, K., Reiners, P. W., Wolff, J. A., Mundil, R., Winters, R. L., 2006. (U-Th)/He dating of volcanic phenocrysts with high-U-Th inclusions, Jemez Volcanic Field, New Mexico. Chemical Geology 227, 223–235. Phillips, D., Matchan, E.L., 2013. Ultra-high precision 40Ar/39Ar ages for Fish Canyon Tuff and Alder Creek Rhyolite sanidine: New dating standards required? Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 121, 229–239. Phillips, D., Matchan, E.L., Honda, M., Kuiper, K.F., 2017. Astronomical calibration of 40Ar/39Ar reference minerals using high-precision, multi-collector (ARGUSVI) mass spectrometry. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 196 IS -, 351–369. Renne, P.R., Swisher, C.C., Deino, A.L., Karner, D.B., Owens, T.L., DePaolo, D.J., 1998. Intercalibration of standards, absolute ages and uncertainties in 40Ar/39Ar dating. Chemical Geology 145, 117-152. Spell, T.L. and McDougall, I., 2003. Characterization and calibration of 40Ar/39Ar dating standards. Chemical Geology 198, 189-211. 27 Spiegel, C., Kohn, B., Belton, D., Berner, Z., Gleadow, A., 2009. Apatite (U-Th-Sm)/He thermochronology of rapidly cooled samples: The effect of He implantation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 285, 105-114. Tauler. E., Campeny, M., Melgarejo, J.C., Bambi., A., Mangas, J., Manuel., J., 2014. Patrones de formación y de alteración de la vermiculita en las carbonatitas volcánicas de Catanda (Angola). Macla 19, Proceedings of the XXXIV Conference of the Spanish Society of Mineralogy. Villa, I.M., De Bièvre, P., Holden, N.E., Renne, P.R., 2015. IUPAC-IUGS recommendation on the halflife of 87Rb. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 164, 382-385. Woodhead, J.D., 2002. A simple method for obtaining highly accurate Pb isotope data by MC-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 17, 1-6. 28 Supplementary Tables Table A1. Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb isotope compositions in minerals and groundmass of Catanda lavas Sample Fraction AC-21 apatite AC-21 cpx Rb ppm Sr ppm 87Rb/86Sr 0.04 3539 0.00003 6.20 601 0.0299 87Sr/86Sr AC-21 groundmass AC-24 apatite AC-24 cpx 0.18 4274 0.00012 AC-24 groundmass 0.30 147 0.0059 AC-25 apatite AC-25 cpx 0.62 3996 0.00045 AC-25 groundmass 95.20 2861 0.0962 0.703363 0.703525 0.703460 0.703101 0.703537 0.703086 Sm ppm Nd ppm 147Sm/144Nd 79.5 536 0.0897 6.80 40.60 0.101 28.01 220 0.0771 169 1155 0.0885 3.86 21.40 0.109 27.08 211 0.0775 123 839 0.0887 3.30 16.27 0.1230 22.35 183 0.0739 143Nd/144Nd 0.512782 0.512803 0.512790 0.512784 0.512855 0.51 0.512783 0.512810 0.512796 eNd Lu ppm Hf ppm 176Lu/177Hf 2.9 3.3 0.08 12.10 0.00094 3.1 0.32 2.94 0.0155 3.0 4.4 3.6 0.32 3.10 0.0147 2.9 3.5 0.04 6.67 0.00081 3.2 0.24 2.95 0.0115 0.282752 0.282806 0.282807 0.282827 0.282802 1.5 176Hf/177Hf eHf 0.7 0.8 U ppm 2.07 6.77 6.43 4.97 Th ppm 27.51 18.53 18.43 14.14 0.53 261 2.34 193 1.37 314 2.74 20 Pb ppm 238U/204Pb -1.2 0.6 232Th/204Pb 3585 547 931 354 206Pb/204Pb 20.576 20.504 20.502 20.093 207Pb/204Pb 15.788 15.808 15.809 15.784 208Pb/204Pb 39.994 40.176 40.167 39.866 206Pb/204Pbi 20.550 20.485 20.470 20.091 207Pb/204Pbi 15.627 15.689 15.615 15.772 208Pb/204Pbi 39.879 40.158 40.137 39.855 trace element abundances and parent/daughter ratios based on trace element analysis of splits taken from the sample solutions age corrections (for 0.65 Ma) are trivial and not listed, except for Pb isotope results cpx: clinopyroxene 29 Table A2. Rb-Sr isotope dilution results for Catanda phlogopites (plus apatite and clinopyroxene results) Rb ppm Sr ppm 87Rb/86Sr 87Sr/86Sr AC-21 AC-21 AC-21 phl res 1 phl res 2 phl L2 513 210 431* 115 118 1672* 12.95 5.164 0.746 0.703969 0.703458 0.703471 AC-21 AC-21 apatite cpx 0.04 6.20 3539 601 0.00003 0.0299 0.703363 0.703525 AC-24 AC-24 AC-24 AC-24 AC-24 phl res 1 phl res 2 phl L2 apatite cpx 475 378 169* 0.18 0.30 227 174 3748* 4274 147.0 6.047 6.292 0.1301 0.00012 0.0059 0.703380 0.703451 0.703463 0.703460 0.703101 AC-25 AC-25 AC-25 AC-25 AC-25 phl res 1 phl res 2 phl L2 apatite cpx 409 459 66* 0.62 95.2 196 169 236* 3996 2861 6.026 7.859 0.814 0.00045 0.0962 0.703425 0.703307 0.703475 0.703537 0.703086 Abbreviations: phl=phlogopite, phl res1 and phl res2 refer to sets of phlogopite grains picked from same separate, phl res 1 was leached with 0.5M, phl res 2 was leached with 2M HNO3; phl L2 refers to 2M HNO3 leachates; cpx is clinopyroxene all phlogopite residue and leachate analyses by isotope dilution; Rb/Sr for apatite and clinopyroxene from trace element analysis, see Table A1 *denotes nanograms of Rb and Sr in phl L2 leachate fractions: ppm could not be calculated because leachate equivalent masses are unknown 30 Table A3. (U-Th-Sm)/He ages of Catanda apatite grains Sample no. Lab. no. No. of crystals analysed He no. AC-21 AC-21 AC-21 AC-21 AC-21 8971 9009 9069 9070 11669 3 4 7 6 4 27059 27145 27193 27195 36352 0.047 0.078 0.166 0.208 0.035 11.86 12.88 12.26 13.29 15.75 AC-25 AC-25 AC-25 AC-25 AC-25 8989 9012 11673 11674 9072 1 6 4 6 5 27083 27156 36364 36367 27199 0.017 0.044 0.075 0.029 0.068 13.34 8.82 11.60 11.39 11.35 1 1 1 1 27204 36180 36289 36400 1.308 5.357 3.867 21.672 17.32 15.27 15.18 17.25 4He (ncc) Th/U ratio aAge (Ma) Error (± 2) (Ma) 0.69 0.89 0.58 0.57 0.65 b 0.64 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.13 0.64 0.63 0.76 0.62 b 0.65 0.04 0.08 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.09 32.4 31.6 31.7 29.7 b 31.3 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.0 c1.33 Durango apatite - standard Durango Durango Durango Durango aNote 9074 11658 11675 11684 grains were abraded and more than 20 m of the outer surface removed, so no -ejection correction was applied. mean age (uncertainties at 95% confidence level) calculated using Isoplot v. 4.15 (Ludwig, 2012). bWeighted cAnalysis excluded from calculation of weighted mean age. 31 Table A4. ARGUSVI 40Ar/39Ar Analytical Results for Catanda phlogopite samples 21PHL, 22PHL, 24PHLa,b,c,d Data are corrected for mass spectrometer backgrounds, discrimination, radioactive decay and interferencese Sample ID Step No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Laser Power (%) J-Value = (one grain) 3% 5% 7% 9% 12% 16% 30% Sample 21PHL-2 21PHL-2a 1 21PHL-2b 2 Sample 21 Sample 21PHL-1 21PHL-1a 21PHL-1b 21PHL-1c 21PHL-1d 21PHL-1e 21PHL-1f 21PHL-1g 40Ar ±1σ (fA) 39Ar ±1σ (fA) 38Ar ±1σ (fA) 37Ar ±1σ (fA) 36Ar ±1σ 39Ar (x10-14 mol) Ca/K ±1σ (fA) %40Ar* 40Ar*/39Ar ±1σ Cum.% 39Ar Age (Ma) ±1σ 0.000105030 ±0.000000038 796.33 860.80 324.39 116.56 218.19 152.01 12.30 0.28 0.23 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 1.607 1.825 1.621 0.904 2.076 2.100 0.116 0.022 0.017 0.032 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.019 0.5000 0.5400 0.2016 0.0714 0.1324 0.0906 0.0076 0.0005 0.0009 0.0003 0.0003 0.0006 0.0004 0.0001 1.52 0.07 0.07 0.07 1.14 2.47 0.07 1.83 0.15 0.15 0.15 1.61 1.45 0.15 2.6524 2.8649 1.0698 0.3790 0.7023 0.4808 0.0405 0.0029 0.0050 0.0017 0.0014 0.0030 0.0019 0.0007 0.0057 0.0065 0.0058 0.0032 0.0074 0.0075 0.0004 1.66 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.96 2.06 1.11 2.00 0.14 0.16 0.28 1.36 1.21 2.22 0.56 0.63 1.54 2.91 3.91 5.58 1.67 2.76 3.00 3.09 3.75 4.11 4.04 1.77 0.56 0.83 0.32 0.49 0.44 0.27 1.73 15.68 33.48 49.30 58.12 78.38 98.87 100.00 0.52 0.57 0.58 0.71 0.78 0.76 0.34 0.11 0.16 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.33 (one grain) 3% 30% 601.21 711.12 0.09 0.19 1.182 5.505 0.021 0.030 0.3764 0.4357 0.0004 0.0006 0.21 0.53 1.58 2.16 1.9970 2.3112 0.0021 0.0032 0.0042 0.0195 0.31 0.17 2.34 0.69 0.83 2.97 4.22 3.83 0.55 0.18 16.70 94.49 0.80 0.73 0.10 0.03 Sample 21PHL-3 21PHL-3a 1 21PHL-3b 2 (one grain) 3% 30% 813.86 398.07 0.11 0.11 1.378 2.073 0.015 0.012 0.5100 0.2453 0.0011 0.0004 2.73 0.07 2.00 0.15 2.7055 1.3013 0.0060 0.0021 0.0049 0.0074 3.47 0.06 2.54 0.13 0.75 2.40 4.44 4.61 1.30 0.31 39.93 100.00 0.84 0.87 0.25 0.06 Sample 21PHL-4 21PHL-4a 1 21PHL-4b 2 (one grain) 3% 30% 523.53 1,364.20 0.14 0.31 0.387 6.026 0.009 0.022 0.3285 0.8480 0.0007 0.0013 2.10 1.52 1.52 1.42 1.7428 4.4985 0.0035 0.0068 0.0014 0.0214 9.49 0.44 6.85 0.41 0.61 1.55 8.31 3.51 2.75 0.34 6.04 100.00 1.57 0.66 0.52 0.06 Sample 21PHL-5 21PHL-5a 1 21PHL-5b 2 21PHL-5c 3 (one grain) 3% 10% 30% 256.29 1,843.37 32.23 0.07 0.63 0.02 0.068 2.341 0.102 0.025 0.026 0.028 0.1607 1.1596 0.0197 0.0002 0.0014 0.0001 1.60 3.77 2.34 0.87 1.32 1.55 0.8526 6.1517 0.1046 0.0011 0.0074 0.0007 0.0002 0.0083 0.0004 41.49 2.82 40.25 27.38 0.99 28.89 0.68 0.36 3.06 25.84 2.87 9.69 10.76 0.98 3.34 2.69 95.94 100.00 4.89 0.54 1.83 2.03 0.19 0.63 Sample 24 J-Value = 0.000104859 ±0.000000038 Sample 24PHL-1 (one grain, thin flake) 24PHL-1a 1 3% 26.88 0.02 24PHL-1b 2 30% 83.17 0.03 0.556 4.603 0.026 0.020 0.0158 0.0436 0.0001 0.0002 0.20 0.01 1.26 0.01 0.0837 0.2311 0.0008 0.0010 0.0020 0.0163 0.64 0.00 3.97 0.01 7.05 17.04 3.41 3.08 0.45 0.07 10.78 100.00 0.64 0.58 0.09 0.01 Sample 24PHL-2 (two grains) 24PHL-2a 1 3% 24PHL-2b 2 7% 24PHL-2c 3 30% 0.603 2.635 7.646 0.019 0.012 0.020 0.6503 0.5847 0.1092 0.0009 0.0010 0.0004 0.07 0.97 2.75 0.15 1.97 1.44 3.4501 3.1020 0.5793 0.0050 0.0052 0.0021 0.0021 0.0094 0.0271 0.22 0.64 0.63 0.43 1.31 0.33 1.39 1.99 12.55 24.09 7.14 3.25 2.67 0.61 0.08 5.54 29.75 100.00 4.55 1.35 0.61 0.50 0.12 0.02 1.575 4.118 1.729 0.039 0.036 0.039 0.1048 0.1469 0.0187 0.0003 0.0004 0.0001 0.74 0.07 1.74 2.80 0.15 1.24 0.5560 0.7796 0.0992 0.0015 0.0020 0.0007 0.0056 0.0146 0.0061 0.82 0.03 1.77 3.11 0.06 1.26 3.63 6.13 16.19 3.97 3.69 3.31 0.30 0.15 0.14 21.22 76.71 100.00 0.75 0.70 0.62 0.06 0.03 0.03 1,044.58 944.95 197.78 0.36 0.43 0.09 Sample 25 J-Value = 0.000104689 ±0.000000039 Sample 25PHL-1 (three grains, thin flakes) 25PHL-1a 1 3% 172.26 0.05 25PHL-1b 2 7% 247.95 0.07 25PHL-1c 3 30% 35.33 0.03 a Atmospheric argon composition of Lee et al. (2006) is assumed for mass-discrimation corrections and for trapped argon composition. a Red text indicates meaningless 39Ar measurement (<1 fA, i.e. <10x background), step excluded from total gas age calculation. c Age errors are one sigma uncertainties and exclude uncertainties in the J-value. d J-values are calculated assuming an age of 1.18144 ±0.00068 Ma (1s; Phillips et al., 2017.) for Alder Creek sanidine. e Interference corrections values are: (36Ar/37Ar)Ca = 2.570 (± 0.002) x 10-4; (39Ar/37Ar)Ca = 6.62 (± 0.08) x 10-4; (40Ar/39Ar)K = 0.001210 (± 0.000016). f Data are corrected for mass spectrometer backgrounds, discrimination and radioactive decay. g Data are not corrected for Ca-interference due to small sample size and negligible quantities of 37Ar. 32 Table A4. cont. 37Ar set to zero, no Ca-interferece correction appliedf,g ±1σ ±1σ 39Ar (x10-14 mol) Ca/K ±1σ 2.6528 2.8649 1.0698 0.3791 0.7026 0.4814 0.0405 0.0028 0.0050 0.0017 0.0014 0.0030 0.0018 0.0007 0.0057 0.0065 0.0058 0.0032 0.0074 0.0075 0.0004 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.54 0.63 1.54 2.90 3.87 5.45 1.62 2.69 2.99 3.08 3.75 4.06 3.94 1.72 0.56 0.83 0.32 0.49 0.43 0.27 1.73 15.68 0.51 33.48 0.57 49.30 0.58 58.11 0.71 78.37 0.77 98.87 0.75 100.00 0.33 Total gas age: 652 ± 18 ka (2σ) 0.0 0.0 1.9970 2.3113 0.0021 0.0031 0.0042 0.0195 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.83 2.96 4.21 3.82 0.54 0.17 16.70 0.80 0.10 94.47 0.72 0.03 Total gas age: 740 ± 90 ka (2σ) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7062 1.3013 0.0060 0.0021 0.0049 0.0074 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.73 2.40 4.29 4.60 1.30 0.31 39.96 0.81 0.24 100.00 0.87 0.06 Total gas age: 850 ± 270 ka (2σ) 0.0007 0.0013 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7433 4.4989 0.0035 0.0068 0.0014 0.0214 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.58 1.54 7.86 3.49 2.72 0.34 6.06 100.00 1.49 0.66 0.49 0.06 0.1608 1.1598 0.0198 0.0002 0.0014 0.0001 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8530 6.1527 0.1052 0.0011 0.0074 0.0005 0.0002 0.0083 0.0004 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.63 0.35 2.51 23.64 2.74 7.80 9.84 0.98 2.64 2.73 95.89 100.00 4.47 0.52 1.48 1.70 0.18 0.40 0.03 0.02 0.0158 0.0436 0.0001 0.0002 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0837 0.2311 0.0007 0.0010 0.0020 0.0163 N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.00 17.04 3.38 3.08 0.42 0.07 10.79 100.00 0.64 0.58 0.08 0.01 0.60 2.64 7.65 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.6503 0.5848 0.1093 0.0009 0.0010 0.0004 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4501 3.1022 0.5800 0.0050 0.0052 0.0020 0.0021 0.0094 0.0271 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.39 1.98 12.44 24.07 7.11 3.22 2.67 0.61 0.08 1.58 4.12 1.73 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.1048 0.1470 0.0188 0.0002 0.0004 0.0001 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5562 0.7796 0.0996 0.0013 0.0020 0.0006 0.0056 0.0146 0.0061 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.60 6.13 15.81 3.93 3.69 3.23 0.27 0.15 0.12 40Ar 21PHL-1a 21PHL-1b 21PHL-1c 21PHL-1d 21PHL-1e 21PHL-1f 21PHL-1g 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3.00% 5.00% 7.00% 9.00% 12.00% 16.00% 30.00% 796.33 860.80 324.39 116.56 218.19 152.01 12.30 0.28 0.23 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 1.61 1.82 1.62 0.90 2.08 2.10 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.5000 0.5400 0.2017 0.0715 0.1324 0.0907 0.0076 0.0005 0.0009 0.0003 0.0003 0.0006 0.0003 0.0001 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21PHL-2a 21PHL-2b 1 2 3.00% 30.00% 601.21 711.12 0.09 0.19 1.18 5.50 6.69 0.02 0.03 0.3764 0.4357 0.0004 0.0006 0.0 0.0 21PHL-3a 21PHL-3b 1 2 3.00% 30.00% 813.86 398.07 0.11 0.11 1.38 2.07 0.02 0.01 0.5101 0.2453 0.0011 0.0004 21PHL-4a 21PHL-4b 1 2 3.00% 30.00% 523.53 1,364.20 0.14 0.31 0.39 6.03 0.01 0.02 0.3286 0.8480 21PHL-5a 21PHL-5b 21PHL-5c 1 2 3 3.00% 10.00% 30.00% 256.29 1,843.37 32.23 0.07 0.63 0.02 0.07 2.34 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.03 24PHL-1a 24PHL-1b 1 2 3.00% 30.00% 26.88 83.17 0.02 0.03 0.56 4.60 24PHL-2a 24PHL-2b 24PHL-2c 1 2 3 3.00% 7.00% 30.00% 1,044.58 944.95 197.78 0.36 0.43 0.09 25PHL-1a 25PHL-1b 25PHL-1c 1 2 3 3.00% 7.00% 30.00% 172.26 247.95 35.33 0.05 0.07 0.03 (fA) 37Ar ±1σ Laser Power (%) (fA) 38Ar ±1σ Step No (fA) 39Ar ±1σ Sample ID (fA) 36Ar (fA) %40Ar* 40Ar*/39Ar ±1σ Cum.% 39Ar Age (Ma) 0.10 0.16 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.32 5.54 4.55 0.50 29.75 1.34 0.11 100.00 0.61 0.02 Total gas age: 800 ± 80 ka (2σ) 21.22 76.70 100.00 0.74 0.70 0.61 Total gas age: 690 ± 60 ka (2σ) 33 ±1σ 0.05 0.03 0.02 Table A4. cont. Background Correction Blank no. 40Ar ARGUSVI Detector Sensitivity and Discrimination Corrections ±1σ (fA) 39Ar ±1σ (fA) 38Ar ±1σ (fA) 37Ar ±1σ (fA) 36Ar ±1σ (fA) H1/Ax [40] H1/L1 [40] H1/L2 [40] AX (1amu) L1 (1amu) L2 (1amu) H1/CDD ±1σ (%) 1.00121689 1.00121689 1.00121689 1.00121689 1.00121689 1.00121689 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99890499 0.99890499 0.99890499 0.99890499 0.99890499 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99378531 0.99378531 0.99378531 0.99378531 0.99378531 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99279355 0.99279355 0.99279355 0.99279355 0.99279355 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99079307 0.99079307 0.99079307 0.99079307 0.99079307 0.99079307 0.99352078 0.99352078 0.99352078 0.99352078 0.99352078 0.99352078 0.99352078 320.402846 320.402846 320.402846 320.402846 320.402846 320.402846 320.402846 0.09594157 0.09594157 0.09594157 0.09594157 0.09594157 0.09594157 0.09594157 EXB#57 EXB#57 EXB#58 EXB#58 EXB#59 EXB#59 EXB#60 2.481 2.481 2.547 2.547 2.185 2.185 2.575 0.028 0.028 0.024 0.024 0.016 0.016 0.026 0.077 0.077 0.086 0.086 0.056 0.056 0.068 0.016 0.016 0.020 0.020 0.018 0.018 0.016 -0.026 -0.026 -0.065 -0.065 -0.021 -0.021 -0.069 0.040 0.040 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.013 0.002 0.002 0.021 0.021 -0.011 -0.011 0.019 0.013 0.013 0.007 0.007 0.012 0.012 0.023 0.01591 0.01591 0.01670 0.01670 0.01573 0.01573 0.01591 0.00028 0.00028 0.00026 0.00026 0.00009 0.00009 0.00035 EXB#62 EXB#62 1.934 1.934 0.013 0.013 0.035 0.035 0.019 0.019 -0.068 -0.068 0.024 0.024 0.016 0.016 0.019 0.019 0.01324 0.01324 0.00031 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00031 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 EXB#63 EXB#63 1.849 1.849 0.030 0.030 0.077 0.077 0.008 0.008 -0.035 -0.035 0.010 0.010 -0.005 -0.005 0.012 0.012 0.01362 0.01362 0.00026 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00026 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 EXB#63 EXB#64 1.849 2.632 0.030 0.014 0.077 0.027 0.008 0.016 -0.035 -0.034 0.010 0.017 -0.005 0.025 0.012 0.013 0.01362 0.01619 0.00026 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00029 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 EXB#65 EXB#65 EXB#65 1.975 1.975 1.975 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.021 0.021 0.021 -0.093 -0.093 -0.093 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.01356 0.01356 0.01356 0.00028 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00028 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00028 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 EXB#65 EXB#66 1.975 1.813 0.014 0.025 0.033 0.048 0.021 0.007 -0.093 -0.015 0.005 0.012 0.008 0.029 0.008 0.018 0.01356 0.01340 0.00028 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00021 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 EXB#66 EXB#66 EXB#66 1.813 1.813 1.813 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.007 0.007 0.007 -0.015 -0.015 -0.015 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.01340 0.01340 0.01340 0.00021 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00021 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00021 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 EXB#67 EXB#67 EXB#67 2.091 2.091 2.091 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.032 0.032 0.032 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.01542 0.01542 0.01542 0.00042 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00042 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 0.00042 1.00121689 0.99890499 0.99378531 0.99279355 0.99079307 0.99352078 320.402846 0.09594157 34 Table A5. Summary of Ar-Ar age results calculated for Catanda phlogopite (samples 21PHL, 24PHL and 25PHL) Inverse isochron results Age spectrum/weighted mean age results Plateau age E (ka, 2σ) Steps 39Ar (%) (ka) 690 ±63 2–7 84.3 Total gas ages MSWD p Age (ka) E (ka, 2σ) ±180 (40Ar/36Ar)i E (2σ) Age (ka) E (ka, 2σ) MSWD p 21PHL-1 1–6 297.62 ±0.72 777 ±98 0.56 0.69 1.5 0.19 650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 740 ±90 21PHL-3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 850 ±270 21PHL-4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21PHL-5 21PHL Steps included 21PHL-2 Sample no. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 298.18 ±0.46 762 ±66 1.70 0.07 Weighted mean age (ka) E (ka, 2σ) Steps MSWD p - - ratios 298.18 ±0.76 776 ±81 1.50 0.19 741 ±44 n=7 - 1.4 0.22 - - Aliquant no. All data where 21PHL-1, -2, -3, -4, -5 39Ar>1 fA (n=12) Data with concordant 21PHL-1, -2, -3, -4, -5 40Ar*/39Ar (n=7) 24PHL 24PHL-1,-2 n=3 (errorchron)a 302.2 ±1.1 553 ±24 0.20 0.65 - - - - - - 800 ±80 25PHL 25PHL-1 n=3 (errorchron)a 301.2 ±1.8 588 ±58 0.53 0.47 - - - - - - 690 ±60 0.50 0.73 - - - - - - - - 24PHL + 24PHL-1,2 and 25PHL-1b n=6 302.01 ±0.87 558 ±22 25PHL aClassified as errorchron, rather than isochron, due to use of 3 data points only, uncertainty is 95% CI. bJ-value of 0.00104689 ± 0.037% (25PHL value) was used to calculate age for 24PHL-25PHL composite inverse isochron. 35 Table A6. ARGUSVI Sample ID Step No 40Ar/39Ar Analytical Results for Alder Creek Rhyolite sanidine fusionsa,b Laser Power 40Ar ±1σ (fA) 39Ar ±1σ (fA) 38Ar ±1σ (fA) ±1σ 37Ar (fA) 36Ar ±1σ 39Ar (x10-14 mol) Ca/K (fA) ±1σ %40Ar* 40Ar*/39Ar ±1σ Sample AC8 (three-grain aliquots) AC8-1 1 35% AC8-2 1 35% AC8-3 1 35% AC8-4 1 35% AC8-5 1 35% 489.30 473.33 606.62 576.50 527.63 0.04 0.13 0.12 0.18 0.11 72.03 69.62 89.83 89.09 76.95 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.0257 0.0251 0.0300 0.0132 0.0309 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 2.6374 0.0729 3.6744 0.7241 0.0730 1.8899 0.1458 2.7247 2.5232 0.1459 0.1363 0.1333 0.1591 0.0698 0.1638 0.0014 0.0010 0.0012 0.0009 0.0008 0.2557 0.2471 0.3189 0.3163 0.2732 0.064 0.002 0.072 0.014 0.002 0.046 91.68 6.2283 0.0073 0.004 91.59 6.2274 0.0058 0.053 92.17 6.2240 0.0053 0.050 96.38 6.2371 0.0044 0.003 90.73 6.2214 0.0037 Weighted mean: 6.2272±0.0044 (2σ); MSWD=2.0, p=0.1 Sample AC9 (three-grain aliquots) AC9-1 1 35% AC9-2 1 35% AC9-3 1 35% AC9-4 1 35% AC9-5 1 35% 384.71 520.09 600.46 351.94 512.39 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.28 59.09 79.17 90.01 52.67 71.62 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.0090 0.0150 0.0229 0.0141 0.0414 0.0001 0.0002 0.0001 0.0002 0.0002 4.4979 2.3338 1.0941 2.1657 4.4124 2.0392 1.6513 1.4692 2.2360 1.5657 0.0478 0.0795 0.1213 0.0750 0.2197 0.0006 0.0010 0.0007 0.0011 0.0009 0.2098 0.2811 0.3195 0.1870 0.2542 0.133 0.052 0.021 0.072 0.108 0.060 96.29 6.2696 0.0042 0.036 95.44 6.2690 0.0045 0.029 93.97 6.2689 0.0044 0.074 93.64 6.2576 0.0072 0.038 87.20 6.2387 0.0070 Weighted mean: 6.2679±0.0047 (2σ); MSWD=0.8, p=0.5 a Data are corrected for mass spectrometer backgrounds, discrimination and radioactive decay. Atmospheric argon composition of Lee et al. (2006) is assumed. corrections values are: (36Ar/37Ar)Ca = 2.570 (± 0.002) x 10-4; (39Ar/37Ar)Ca = 6.62 (± 0.08) x 10-4; (40Ar/39Ar)K = 0.001210 (± 0.000016). b Interference 36