The meteorite of Barcelona (1704): history, discovery and
classification
Jordi LLORCA1,2,*, Marc CAMPENY3,4, Neus IBÁÑEZ-CORTINA5, David ALLEPUZ6, Josep Maria
CAMARASA7, Josep AURELL-GARRIDO8
1

Institute of Energy Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering and Barcelona Research Center in Multiscale Science and Engineering,

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, EEBE, Eduard Maristany 10-14, E-08019 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
2 Institut

d’Estudis Catalans, Carrer del Carme 47, E-08001 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

3 Museu

de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, Departament de Mineralogia, Passeig Picasso s/n, E-08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

4 Departament

de Mineralogia, Petrologia I Geologia Aplicada, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franquès s/n, E-08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

5

Botanic Institute of Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-ICUB), Passeig del Migdia s/n, E-08038 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

6

Sant Julià de Vilatorta Observatory, E-08514 Sant Julià de Vilatorta, Catalonia, Spain.

7

Seminari d’Història de la Ciència Joan Francesc Bahí. Fundació Carl Faust. Passeig Carles Faust, 9. E-17300 Blanes, Catalonia, Spain.

8

Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB, E-08193 Cerdanyola del

Vallès, Catalonia, Spain.

*Corresponding author: jordi.llorca@upc.edu

Abstract
On Christmas Day 1704, at 17h (UT), a meteorite fell in Terrassa (about 25 km NW of
Barcelona). The meteorite fall was seen and heard by many people over an area of several
hundred kilometers and it was recorded in several historical sources. In fact, it was
interpreted as a divine sign and used for propaganda purposes during the War of the Spanish
Succession. Although it was believed that meteorite fragments were never preserved, here
we discuss the recent discovery of two fragments (49.8 and 33.7 g) of the Barcelona
meteorite in the Salvador Cabinet collection (Botanic Institute of Barcelona). They are very
well preserved and partially covered by a fresh fusion crust, which suggests a prompt
recovery, shortly after the fall. Analysis of the fragments has revealed that the Barcelona
meteorite is a L6 ordinary chondrite. These fragments are among the oldest historical
meteorites preserved in the world.
Keywords: Meteorite fall, historical meteorite, L chondrite.

1. Introduction
Educated Europe, from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, was suffused with passion for
collecting antiques, paintings, sculptures, jewels, and a wide variety of objects that could be
classed as “marvels” or “curiosities”. For more than three centuries, the so-called cabinets
were a privileged venue for developing natural history: the discipline which is the origin of
the natural sciences of today. This is the case of the Salvador Cabinet, which has been
preserved since 1938 in the Botanic Institute of Barcelona (a joint venture between the
Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) and the Barcelona City Council), and managed by
Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona (MCNB). The Salvador family was a line of
apothecaries settled in Barcelona from the early XVII to the mid-XIX centuries. They founded
a valuable scientific library, a botanic garden and the most significant cabinet of curiosities
and natural history in Catalonia at that time. Since the beginning of the 18th century to the
middle of the 19th century the Salvador Cabinet was a must for all those interested in natural
history, or simply curious people or scholars who passed through the city of Barcelona. In
fact, it was the first museum open to the inhabitants of Barcelona, as mentioned by the city
guides since 1797 (Camarasa 2018). Here we report that, among all the treasures, the
Salvador Cabinet collection also preserved two fragments of the meteorite that fell in
Terrassa (25 km NW of Barcelona) in 1704. This meteorite is known as the Barcelona
meteorite. According to the Meteoritical Bulletin, there are only six official and classified
meteorite falls older than the meteorite of Barcelona in the world: Nogata (Japan, 861),
Ensisheim (France, 1492), Jalandhar (India, 1621), Minamino (Japan, 1632), Vago (Italy, 1668)
and Sasagase (Japan, 1704).
The fall of the Barcelona meteorite was widely reported and cited (see a review of the
bibliography in Llorca 2004 and Aragonés 2008), but until today preserved fragments of this
meteorite were not known in any public or private institution. During the cataloging of the
Salvador Cabinet, Aurell-Garrido (2015) and Aragonés (2015) pointed out the existence of
two meteorite specimens in a glass jar accompanied by an old label. In the present work, we
carry out the petrographic and geochemical description of the Barcelona meteorite and its
corresponding classification as a L6 ordinary chondrite. We have also compiled, transcribed,
and translated the most relevant historical documents and illustrations regarding the
Barcelona meteorite fall, constituting a valuable example of how a meteorite fall was
interpreted in the Modern Age as a bad omen and also as a divine sign. In the case of the

Barcelona meteorite fall, it was also the origin of numerous predictions and superstitions
related to the War of the Spanish Succession (1702-1714).

2. The Barcelona meteorite fall (25th December of 1704)
2.1. The fireball
On Christmas Day 1704, at 17h local time (also 17h UT at that time), when it was getting
dark, a meteorite fell in Catalonia, causing a fireball in the sky that was seen and heard by
many people over an area of several hundred kilometers. The fireball was observed from
several different places in southern France and Catalonia (Fig. 1), as deduced from more
than twenty reports that have been compiled from official and private historical archives, as
well as from personal diaries and chronicles.

Figure 1. Geographic map with the localities where the fireball was observed and where meteorite fragments
were collected (black circle) as stated in the primary source texts.

The first report of the fireball was released shortly after the fall, on December 28th. It was a
printed communication (in Spanish) published in Zaragoza explaining the great fireball that

was seen from Barcelona (Anonymous 1704). This communication, entitled “True witness
coming from the city of Barcelona to this city of Zaragoza, on December 28, 1704” (Verídica
relación venida de la civdad de Barcelona â esta ciudad de Zaragoza, â 28 de Deziembre de
1704), was illustrated with an engraving showing the passage of the fireball over the Earth
(tierra) in relation to the Sun, the Moon, and the position of several starry symbols, as
observed from Barcelona (Fig. 2a). It should be noted that five of these symbols, along with
the Moon and the Sun, were drawn in a circle representing the ecliptic, whereas one was
not. After consulting the Stellarium software, it is very interesting to note that the engraving
reflects the position of the planets that were visible at the end of December 1704, as well as
a brilliant star, Formalhaut (Alpha Piscis Austrini, or a PsA), which was the only bright star
south of the ecliptic. Therefore, we have identified (Fig. 2b) the five planets known at that
time (Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) and a PsA on the engraving. Also, the sizes
of Venus and Jupiter were drawn slightly larger than those of the other planets, according to
their brightness. The coincidence of the positions suggests that the engraving was made with
the intention of representing the trajectory of the fireball.

Figure 2. (a) Cover of the printed report that was published in Zaragoza
concerning the meteorite fall as seen from Barcelona (Arxiu Històric de la
Ciutat de Barcelona). (b) Schematic of the engraving with the identification of
the planets and Formalhaut (a PsA).

In April 1705, a very short item of news was published in French in the Journal de Trévoux,
often called the Mémoires de Trévoux, which was an influential academic journal founded by
the Jesuits in 1701. It probably served to publicize the meteorite fall among scholars
(Anonymous, 1705b): “It is written from Barcelona that there appeared a new meteor. Those
who observed it have promised me details of their observations, which I will communicate to
you” (On écrit de Barcelone qu’il y a paru un nouveau Météore. Ceux qui l’ont observé me

promettant un détail de leurs observations, que j’auray soin de vous communiquer).
However, the full report of the meteorite fall was published in Spanish by the lawyer and
historian Narcís Feliu de la Penya (1646-1712) in The Annals of Catalonia (Anales de
Cataluña) (Feliu de la Peña 1709), a compilation of events that occurred in Catalonia from
1458 to 1709:

Concluyóse este año 1704 con el horrendo
metheoro y señal extraordinario del cielo que
apareció día de Navidad a las 5 horas de la
tarde sobre Barcelona, descubriéndose de
toda Cataluña. Era como una bomba, y a lo
exterior opaca, pero salía de ella tal
resplandor que superó con manifiesta
demostración a la luz del sol. Empezó a
inflamarse entre oriente y medio día, corrió
luego lucida a occidente, y acabó entre el
septentrión y occidente, demostrándose más
inflamada y lucida, como un globo de fuego
que caía sobre la tierra, dexando una larga
señal de humo como una nubecilla que se fue
exalando poco a poco, oyéndose después un
trueno muy irregular, cuyo estruendo duró un
grande rato como disparo de artillería y
mosquetería.

The year 1704 ended with the horrific meteor
and extraordinary sign from the sky, which
appeared on Christmas Day, at 5 o'clock in the
afternoon, over Barcelona, and which was
observed throughout Catalonia. It was like a
bomb, and externally opaque, but the great
glow which emerged from it, was brighter
than the light of the sun. It began to swell
between the East and midday, then veered to
the West, and ended up situated between
North and West. It was more inflamed and
bright, like a balloon of fire falling on the
Earth, leaving a long streak of smoke like a
little cloud that was slowly disappearing. And
then a very irregular thunder blast was heard,
whose roar lasted for a long time, like artillery
and musketry.

The description of the fireball by Narcís Feliu de la Penya is very similar to other reports such
as those, for example, which appeared in Catalan in the diary of the lawyer and politician
Manuel Mas y Soldevila (?-1748) (Mas y Soldevila 1705). It was also probably the basis for
the report published in the Historical Narrations (Narraciones Históricas) of the War of the
Spanish Succession written in Spanish by the aristocrat Francesc de Castellví (1682-1757)
(Castellví 1997):

Esta centuria fatal a la Corona de Aragón la
predecía con extraordinarios señales el Cielo.
En 25 de diciembre a las 5 de la tarde se
advirtió en toda Cataluña, y con particularidad
más vivo sobre el hemisferio de Barcelona, un

espantoso y horrendo meteoro. Era el tiempo
sereno y la diafanidad del día añadió horror.
Compareció de repente y descubrióse
distintamente. Era la forma de un globo de
fuego; el exterior, opaco; el centro, color de

sangre. Salía de él tal esplendor que excedió
con manifiesta ventaja la luz del sol, a modo
de coruscación. Ceñíale una nube poco clara, y
a ésta, otro giro tenebroso y denso que
infundía espanto. Así permaneció adverso al
sol un grande rato. Empezó lentamente a
inflamarse entre oriente y mediodía; se
extendió, lúcido, a occidente. Corrió toda la
región entre septentrión y mediodía, como
cubriéndola y allí acabó, manifestándose más
inflamado y lúcido, como que caía sobre la
tierra, dejando una larga señal de humo, a
modo de nubecilla en forma de columna, que
fue exaltándose poco a poco. Oyóse después
un irregular trueno, cuyo estruendo duró un
grande rato, como un continuo disparo de
artillería y fusileria. Los estruendos eran
formidables, alternados con intermisiones. Se
advirtió por una hora no aquietarse del todo la
región. Desvanecido el fuego, que servía de
principal objeto a Barcelona, se extendió por
toda la Cataluña. /…/
This fatal century for the Crown of Aragon was
predicted by extraordinary signs in the sky. On
December 25, at 5 o'clock in the afternoon, a
terrible, horrendous meteor was observed

throughout Catalonia, particularly in the
hemisphere of Barcelona. The weather was
calm and the diaphanous day made it seem
even more horrendous. It appeared suddenly
and distinctly. It was the shape of a ball of fire;
the outside, opaque; the centre, the colour of
blood. It was so much brighter than the
sunlight, because of coruscation. Around it
there was a fuzzy cloud and a terrific dark and
dense twist. It thus managed to remain
adverse to the sun for a long time. It slowly
began to swell between East and midday; it
spread, lucid, to the West. It travelled the
whole region between North and midday as if
it were covering it, and there it stopped, even
brighter, as it fell to Earth, leaving a long
smoke signal, like a little cloud in the form of a
column, which was slowly extinguished. Then
an irregular thunder clap was heard, the roar
of which lasted a long time, like a continuous
firing of artillery and musketry. The rumblings
were
formidable,
alternating
with
intermissions. The region did not become
quiet again for an hour. Once the fire, which
had been located mainly over Barcelona, had
disappeared, it spread all over Catalonia. /…/

Additional details of the fireball are encountered in the Ceremonial of the Magnificient
Counselors and Regiment of the City of Barcelona (Ceremonial dels Magnífichs Consellers y
Regiment de la Ciutat de Barcelona), or Rubrics of Bruniquer, where the fireball was
described as seen from Barcelona (in Catalan) (Bruniquer 1916):

Dijous á XXV de desembre de 1704, en Dietari
apar, que a les sinch de la tarda, estant seré y
sens veurer-se ningún núvol, de repente, se
veu una flamarada molt ardent en la present
Ciutat, aixint y venint segons verídicas
personas del mar, uns dient venia â modo de
barra de viga de foch, ê altres ab globo y cua,
se ubrí y dexà tres núvols molt blanchs los

quals duraren en la regió celeste més de mitja
hora, y després de esta flamarada se sentí en
lo cel com si se disparaven alguns artillerías y
després molta mosquetería que durà cerca de
alguns tres credos. Déu nos vulla mirar ab ulls
de misericòrdia y donar-nos sa gràcia, amén.

Thursday, 25th December of 1704, at five
o'clock in the afternoon, the sky was serene
and cloudless. Suddenly there was a very
bright flash, according to reliable testimonies,
from the sea. Some people said it was shaped
like a bar or like a beam of fire and others
claimed that it was like a balloon with a tail. It

opened and formed three very white clouds
that remained in the celestial region for more
than half an hour. After this blaze, sounds like
artillery fire and later a lot of musket fire were
heard for approximately the time it takes to
say three Creeds. May God look on us with
mercy and grant us his grace. Amen.

The breakage of the fireball described in the Rubrics of Bruniquer is also reported in the
Scientific Miscellany (Miscelánea científica) of Josep Bolló. He was a young grocer settled in
Barcelona (Bolló 1717), who produced a colorful drawing entitled (in Latin) Signum magnum
aparuit in celo (A great sign appeared in the sky) showing the division of the fireball into
three fragments (Fig. 3). The drawing is accompanied by the following text in Catalan (it
should be noted that the date of Christmas Day 1705 refers to the old calendar in Western
Europe, according to which the beginning of the year was December 25):

Señal del cel que ab grandíssim estruendo
aparegué als 25 de desembre, dia de Nadal de
l'añy 1705 a las 5 horas de la tarda. Fou cosa
molt orrorosa, així per trobar-se lo emisferi
ben clar y ceré com per lo gran rimbombo y
resplandor que féu.

Sign in the sky which appeared with a really
loud noise on 25th December, Christmas Day
of the year 1704 [1705 according to the old
calendar] at five o'clock in the afternoon. It
was a very horrible thing because the
hemisphere was clear and calm and it fell with
a great roar and blaze.

7

Figure 3. Illustration from the Scientific Miscellany of Josep Bolló (1717) showing the meteorite fall seen from
Barcelona (Biblioteca de la Universitat de Barcelona, Ms 95).

8

Ernst Florens Friedrich Chladni (1776-1827), the founder of meteoritics (Marvin 2007),
included the meteorite fall of Barcelona in his work “New contributions to the knowledge of
fireballs and the fallen masses” (Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Feuermeteore und der
herabgefallenen Massen), published in German in the Annals of Physics (Chladni 1826). He
essentially quoted the data reported by Narcís Feliu de la Penya outlined above:

1704, am Weihnachtstage, also den 25
December, um 5 Uhr ereignete sich in der
Gegend von Barcelona ein Meteorsteinfall, der
in den Anales de Cataluña por Don Narciso
Feliu de la Peña y Farell (Barcelona 1709) libr.
XXII. cap. 14 gut beschrieben ist. Die
Feuerkugel ward in ganz Catalonien gesehen;
sie erschien wie eine Bombe, anfangs
ausserlich dunkel, ward immer heller, und
übertraf endlich an Glanz das Sonnenlicht; sie
entzündete sich (vermuthlich von Barcelona
aus gesehen) zwischen Ö und S, bewegte sich
nach W, und endete zwischen N und W, fiel
auf die Erde, liess einen breiten Streifen von
Rauch nach, wie eine Wolke, die sich nach und
nach zerstreute, und machte schreckliches,
lange anhaltendes Getöse wie Kanonen – und
Musketenfeuer /.../

On December 25th of 1704, Christmas Day, at
5 o'clock in the area of Barcelona, a meteorite
fall occurred as described in the Anales de
Cataluña by Don Narcís Feliu de la Penya i
Farell (Barcelona 1709) libr. XXII. cap. 14. The
fireball was seen throughout Catalonia; it
appeared like a bomb, at first darker,
becoming brighter, and finally, with a glow
that surpassed the sunlight; it ignited
(presumably seen from Barcelona) between
East and South, moved to the West, and fell to
the Earth between North and West, with a
broad strip of smoke, like a cloud, gradually
dispersing. And it made a terrible, long-lasting
noise like cannon and musket fire /…/

In this way, the meteorite fall was incorporated later on in compilations by other authors
with the name of Barcelona meteorite, (i.e. Arago 1855, Greg 1861, Faura i Sans 1921).
Actually, the meteorite fragments did not fall over the city of Barcelona; they really fell
about 25 km NW in the vicinities of Terrassa (vide infra). In fact, the fireball was also seen
from places other than Barcelona. Another testimony (in Latin) is found in an autograph text
by the notary Joan Ferrer Bordila, who saw the fireball from Verges, which is a small town
located 105 km NE of Barcelona (Llorca et al. 2002; 2004) (Fig. 1):

In nomine Sanctissimæ Trinitatis, Patris et Filii
et Spiritus Sancti. Ad futuram rei memoriam,

sciant lectores presentem scripturam legentes
qualiter die iouis intitulata festiuitate Natalis

9

Domini Nostri Iesuchristi, vigésima quinta
mensis desembris anno a Natiuitate Domini
millessimo septingentessimo quinto, inter
quintam et sextam horas serotinæ, serenitate
eolisque tranquillitate fruentes, vidimus in
emisferio nostro et precipue a parte meridie
de celo ignis ardentis signum descendentem
versus ocassum ad instar fulguris, magno cum
splendore, et terrore omnium circunstantium
in terra decurrentem. Postque visionem hanc
fere medii quarti spatium magnum audiuimus
terremotum Gerundam versus vbi ad
aparientiam dictum signum descendit pro vt
in illo statu tormentum belli iecissent
pugnamque magnam tenuissent. Ex quo
pronosticum facimus alicuius rei uenturæ.
Placeat omnipotentis Domino Nostro Deo vt
sit bona. Amen.

In the name of the Holy Trinity: Father, Son
and Holy Ghost. For future memory, let those
who read this text know that on Thursday,
December 25, 1704, the feast of the Nativity
of Our Lord Jesus Christ, between five and six
o'clock in the evening, the sky being serene
and the wind calm we witnessed a ball of
glowing fire, something like a very bright sun
beam, coming down from midday and
westward direction. All of us being very
frightened, we saw how it rushed towards the
ground. Then, not even half a quarter of an
hour having passed, we heard a kind of great
earthquake coming from Girona, a place
where apparently the sign had fallen, as if a
war had broken out there or a great battle
was being fought. From all this, we infer what
our future destiny may be. In God’s name.
Amen.

In the notes and accounts of the heirs of Quatrecases of Pruit (Llibres de comptes i notes dels
hereus Quatrecases de Pruit) (1686-1812), the following description of the fireball appears in
Catalan as seen from the Collsacabra mountains (Fig. 1), about 80 km N of Barcelona
(Ginebra 2005). In this case, the account reports that the smoke trail split in two parts, not
three as found in the other records. This could be due to the position of the observer with
respect to the fireball trajectory:
Lo dia de Nadal del any 1704 venint jo, Joan
Quatrecases, de Pruit, trobant-me aver ja
deixat lo camí real y éser al mitx de la plana és
sobra la margenada de la devesa prop de un
roura gran que·i·à a la vora de dita
margenada y prop lo devallant de dita
margenada venint per la dressera, he vist una
claredat gran que abrigà lo dit roura y a mi, y
pasa ab tanta pressa com fan a vegadas los
núvols quant fa gran vent y passan per devant
lo sol, y tenia la dita claredat que pasa a mi
cosa de algunas dos canas de amplària, y
veent la dita claredat mirí envers lo sel y he
vist un ratx de foch en lo sel, que a la vista mia

exia de lo endret del Putx de Catifell y se’n anà
a parar a la part de envès mitx soley de la
garssa, so és Déu sap a ont finà, però dich faé
lo camí en aquex endret y lo dit ratx de foch
era gran y dexava al derrere una cuaraña de
foch com lo bras y al derrera de dita cuaraña
per tot de aont pasa lo dit foch cadà un gran
ratx de fum y com més a la fi del foch anave
més gran fum cadava, y després lo dit fum se
partís per lo mitx en amunt estigué un rato tot
entorxat y poch a poch se anà estenent y
pardent, y a cosa de alguna ora fou ja perdut,
y després de pasat alguna mitat de mitx quart
se sentí, y jo lo he oit, un tro molt llony, a la

10

part de aont anà a finar lo dit ratx de foch, y
sucseí lo dit ratx de foch y tro esent tot saré,
no aparexent-se ningún núvol en tot lo món, y
lo dit senyal moltísima altre gent lo an vist
sense jo.

On Christmas Day of the year 1704 while
myself I, Joan Quatrecases, was coming from
Pruit, having already left the main road and
finding myself in the middle of the plain above
the edge of the meadow near a large oak tree
near the pathway and on the border of the
descent coming via a shortcut, I saw a great
flash of light that surrounded the oak and me.
It moved as rapidly as the clouds sometimes
do when it is very windy and they pass in front
of the Sun. I glimpsed something that was
twelve feet wide. Seeing this flash, I looked up
sky and I saw a ball of fire in the sky, which
came from the mount of Catifell and went to
stop God knows where. And the ball of fire
was large and left behind pieces of fire like
embers and behind them and where all the
fire went was a large trail of smoke, and the
fire left smoke wherever it went. And then the
smoke split in half and the sky stayed all
smoky and slow for a while. Then the smoke
spread out and diminished and after about an
hour it had gone. After about a quarter of an
hour I heard a distant clap of thunder, in the
place where the fireball had been. And the
said trail of fire and thunder existed while the
sky was totally clear without any clouds
appearing in the whole world, and that sign
was seen by many people other than me.

From Matadepera, about 30 km NW from Barcelona (Fig. 1), another interesting testimony
about the fireball is found in the notes (in Catalan) of the peasant Miquel Batlles i Torres
(1676-?) (Galí 1993):

11

Lo any 1704 al mes de dezembra, lo die 25 que
comptam lo die de Nadal, die de la nativitat de
Nostre Senyor al vespra en ves toch de havi
Maria, se veyhé un senyal al cel molt escarrifós
y espantós, que no·l veyé ninguna presona
cristiana que no tingués por y gran susto de
Déu Nostre Senyor, y lo senyal jo Miquel
Batlles lo vax veura y fou de aquesta menera,
que.s veyé de tota la cristiandat, segons
dihuen molta gent docta y entessa, lo senyal
se ha certa de ser allà de hont hés lo sol a la
estiu al mitx del die y de pertot se·l veyé,
totom sobra de ell, y també sentí la gran
remor. I·s que dit senyal, tot en sarè que no·s
veya cap núvol en lo món, y féu clarejà la terra
com un llampech, y aleshores alsí lo cap al cel
y vatx veura un tros de cel bon y obert ab un
forat rodó que y auria passat de corraguda
qualsevol casa de Catalunya, y se veya dit
forat tot vermell de foch molt ardent, y estigué
obert lo espay de un credo, y lo fum que·n va
axí estigué més de una hora y mitge antas no
deshapagué, y en continent que lo senyal del
foch agué deshaparagut, se sentí dal al cel
com un tir de artillaria y de aquex un altra y
altra y després comensaran a sentir los tirs
espessos, que de ninguna menera se posquien
comptar, y després se resolgueran dits tirs com
una bonió de mal temps y axò durà dit suroy
dalt al cel lo espay de un quart de hora, y
sempra se sentia sobra lo cap de un homa allà
de hont se veyé lo senyal del foch, y totom
espantat de veura lo que·s veya y sentir lo que
se sentia, tot en sarè dalt del cel. /…/

In the year 1704, month of December, the
25th day, which is Christmas, the day of Our
Lord's birth, towards sunset, at approximately
the time of the Ave Maria, a threatening and
terrifying sign was seen in the sky, and there
was not a single Christian who did not feel
shock and great fear of our Lord God. I Miquel
Batlles, saw this sign and it was also seen by
all of Christendom, according to many learned
and knowledgeable people. The sign appeared
at the very point where the sun is at midday in
the summer, and for this reason we could see
it right above our heads and also hear the
great roar. With the sky so clear and not a
single cloud visible the sign illuminated the
earth like lightning; then I looked up and saw
that in a part of the sky a large circular hole
had opened through which any farmhouse in
Catalonia would easily have passed. The hole
had become red from a very hot fire, it
remained open for the time it takes to say a
Creed, and the smoke that emerged took
more than an hour and a half to disappear.
Immediately after the fire had disappeared,
something similar to an artillery shot was
heard in the sky, and then another and
another, until the firings began to be heard
more and more often and it was impossible to
count them anymore, with them finally
resembling those shots that are like the dull
murmur that usually comes before storms.
The rumble lasted a quarter of an hour and
was heard above the heads of people in those
places from where the fireball had been, and
everyone was scared at what they had seen
and heard in that completely clear sky /…/

Regarding the observations reported from France, the fireball was spotted from Montpellier
and Marseille, about 285 and 340 km NE from Barcelona, respectively (Fig. 1) by the wellknown astronomers Antoine-François de Laval (1664-1728), François de Plantade (16701741) and Jean de Clapiès (1670-1740), who collaborated with the astronomer Jacques
Cassini (1677-1756), son of the famous Giovanni Domenico Cassini (1625-1712). The fact
12

that the fireball was observed from places separated by about 400 km shows that the
magnitude of the event was remarkable. The following report appeared in French in the
History of the Royal Academy of Sciences in 1705; the date refers to December 26, which is
probably the date when the report was sent (Anonymous 1705c):

Le Pere Laval Jesuite qui est à Marseille, &
Mrs. de Plantade & Clapiés qui sont à
Montpellier, envoyerent à M. Cassini, avec
diverses Observations Astronomiques, la
relation d’un Phenomene lumineux qui avoit
été veu le 26. Dec. 1704 à 5h30’ du soir à
Marseille, & à 5h1/4 à Montpellier. On ne
pouvoit douter par les circonstances des deux
relations que ce ne fut le même. A Marseille où
il fut mieux observé, le Pere Laval vit une
Poutre fort lumineuse, poussée de l’Est à
l’Ouest assez lentement. Le vent étoit à l’Est.
Elle partit d’auprès de Venus, au moins à en
juger par la vûë, & alla jusqu’à la Mer où elle
se plongea, tout au plus à deux lieuës au large.
On avoit veu auparavant à Marseille, ou aux
environs, deux Poutres semblables, & ayant le
même mouvement. A Montpellier, on vit à
l’heure marqée un globe de feu tomber à
quelque distance de la Ville. L’air étoit alors for
serain, & fort calme, & une couleur jaune trèsfoible tegnoit tout le Couchant à la hauteur de
plus de 10 degrez.

Father Jesuit Laval, who is in Marseille, and
Mr. de Plantade and Mr. de Clapiés, who are
in Montpellier, provided information for Mr.
Cassini,
with
various
Astronomical
Observations, about a luminous phenomenon
which had been seen on the 26th of Dec. 1704
at 17h30min in the evening at Marseille, and
at
17h15min
at
Montpellier.
The
circumstances of the two sources make it
clear that they refer to the same event. In
Marseille, where it was better observed,
Father Laval saw a highly luminous beam,
pushing from East to West quite slowly. The
wind was in the East. It departed from Venus,
at least judging by the view, and went to the
sea where it plunged in, at least two leagues
out. We had previously seen two similar
beams in Marseille, or in the neighborhood,
moving in the same way. In Montpellier, at
the time indicated, a globe of fire was seen
falling at some distance from the city. At that
time, the air was calm and serene, and a very
faint yellow color tinted the entire coast to a
height of more than ten degrees.

From all these historical records, it is clear that the fall of the meteorite was, without a
doubt, frightening, considering that all the stories have this point in common. That Christmas
Day of 1704 in the afternoon the sky was serene, without clouds, an atmosphere of peace
and quiet was in perfect harmony with the transcendence of that day, the most celebrated
of the Christian liturgical calendar. Suddenly, a totally unexpected and surprising event broke
the calm of the dusk; a great ball of fire with luminosity similar to the Sun crossed the sky,
leaving a column of smoke visible for a long time. In addition, a great rumble, similar to
firearm, accompanied this luminous phenomenon. Despite the diversity of social origin, the
cultural level, and the geographical origin of the witnesses, they all coincided both in the
13

description of the phenomenon and in its interpretation, which was strongly influenced by
the providential and hyper-religious ideas typical of the Baroque mentality. The witnesses
described the fireball as a bad omen, a signal that God sent them to warn them that, as had
so often happened throughout history, divine fury would come again. They were convinced
because they had never seen a fireball before and because it took place on Christmas Day, a
symbolic date.

2.2. The fall of meteorite fragments
In addition to the fireball, some of the texts discussed above also contain valuable
information about the fall of the meteorite. These texts describe the fall of various
fragments of the meteorite, in accordance to the explosion of the fireball reported by the
witnesses. They also report several places where the meteorite fragments fell. In this regard,
the information given in the manuscript written by Miquel Batlles i Torres clearly indicates
that the fragments fell in Terrassa and surroundings (Galí 1993):
/…/ y ab algunas parts digueran que aleshoras
ab la bonió caygueran unas pedras negras del
cel que passaven tres lliuras y altres dues y
mitge. Digueran que en la Torra d’en Maduxé
de Sant Julià d’Eltura ne avia cayguda una, y a
cassa d’en Falguera de Sant Pera de Terrassa
una altra, y ab moltas altras pars tanbé es
digué que·n vien caygudas, però aqueixas
pedras no las avem vistas y per rahó de Estat
ho creyhem, perquè lo dit senyal y suroy és
axís, ab moltes prèdicas, y de las pedras may
n’an parlat…

/.../ and in some places it was said that then,
with a rumbling sound, black stones that
weighed three pounds and others that
weighed two and a half, fell from the sky.
People said that in the Torre d'en Maduxé, in
Sant Julià d'Altura, one fell, and in Falguera's
house, in Sant Pere de Terrassa, another.
People commented that they had also fallen in
many other parts, and although we have
never seen such stones we believe this,
considering that everything agrees and that
the signs and noises were really as I have said,
even though in many reports the stones were
never mentioned.

In addition to the place where the meteorite fragments fell, the text written by Miquel
Batlles i Torres contains a physical description of the meteorite fragments (black stones) and
data regarding the mass of the meteorite specimens (2.5-3 pounds). Taking into account that
Catalan pounds are equivalent to four hundred grams, this translates into meteorite
fragments of about one kilogram. The descriptions of Mas y Soldevila and Castellví also

14

referred to the fragments that fell in Terrassa and, in addition, described the meteorite
specimens as “black stones with an ashy core”:

/…/ Últimamente desapareció elevándose el
vapor a la suprema región del aire. Quedó un
poco nublado el día y terminó el horror de la
densa sombra sustituyendo la noche las suyas.
Cayeron en Tarrasa, cuatro horas distante de
Barcelona, unas piedras algo crecidas de color
negro y en el centro, cenicientas.

/…/ It finally disappeared and the vapor
ascended high up into the air. The day ended
up a bit cloudy and night-time replaced the
horror of the dense shadows. Some large,
black stones with an ashy core fell in Terrassa,
which is located four hours away from
Barcelona.

The text from Chladni (1826) in the Annals of Physics also described the meteorite
fragments, and tentatively suggested that they could be similar to some known achondrites
at that time:

/.../ an einigen Stellen vielen grosse Steine
nieder, die auwendigschwarz, inwending grau
waren. (Da in dem Berichte nichts von
metallischen Theilen im Innern gesagt ist, so
läst sich mit Wahrscheinlichkeit vermuthen,
dass die Steine denen von Stannern, Jonzac,
Juvenas, u.f.w. mögen ahnlich gewesen seyn,
welch kein Gediegeneisen und kein Nickel
enthalten).

/…/ in some places many big stones fell, which
were black and gray. (As the report says
nothing of metallic parts in the interior, it is
probable that the stones resemble those of
Stannern, Jonzac, Juvenas, and others, which
contain no solid iron and no nickel).

In another document by the Franciscan Nicolás de Jesús Belando (1699-1747) it is reported
(in Spanish) (Belando 1740) “Likewise, in the place of Terrassa, a stone with a rotund shape
fell, which was iron-colored and weighed about seven to eight pounds” (Assimismo en el
Lugar de Terraza cayò una piedra de figura rotunda, de color de hierro, y de peso como de
siete à ocho libras). Also, in a valuable scripture, written in Catalan by the priest Miquel
Garriga, Guardian of the Sant Francesc Convent of Terrassa, we find (Ventalló 1879) “… big
stones weighing 12 pounds fell near Terrassa, in the property of Falguera, with the color of
fire, and ten or twelve more fell in other places” (…caigueren cerca de Tarrasa, en la heretat
15

de·n Falguera, unas pedras mol grosas de pes 12 lliures, de color com si fosen de foch; y ne
caygueren deu o dotse en altres diferents llochs). Thus, according to historic documents,
several fragments of the meteorite fell in different places around the town of Terrassa
(41°34’N, 2°03’E). These fragments weighed up to 5 kg and present a black crust and a gray
core. These descriptions fit those of the features of a stony meteorite covered with the
corresponding fresh fusion crust.

3. The meteorite fall and the War of the Spanish Succession
On November 1st of the year 1700, King Charles II of Spain (1661-1700) died leaving no
descendants. After the unexpected death at the age of six of José Fernando de Baviera
(1692-1699), great-grandson of Philip IV of Spain (1605-1665), who the King had designated
as his heir, two candidates ended up claiming the Spanish crown. On one hand, the
Archduke Charles of Austria from the House of Habsburg (1685-1740), who was son of the
Holy Roman Emperor Leopold I (1640-1705), and on the other hand, Duke Philip of Anjou
(1683-1746) from the French House of Bourbon, who was the grandson of the King of
France, “the Sun” Louis XIV (1638-1715). On his deathbed and in very unclear circumstances,
Charles II eventually appointed Duke Philip of Anjou as his successor. This fact was
considered a threat by neighboring kingdoms, believing that an alliance between France and
Spain endangered the balance of forces that existed in Europe at that time. In addition, the
trade monopoly with America was also at stake. England, the Netherlands and the Austrian
Empire constituted the Great Alliance of Hague in 1701, while Portugal and Savoy would join
later, to support the claims of Archduke Charles of Austria. In March 1702 war broke out
between the Great Alliance and the kingdoms of France and Spain, where Duke Philip of
Anjou was appointed as the new King of Spain with the name of Philip V. This historic conflict
is well known as the Spanish Succession war, which is considered the first large-scale war,
which took place in modern Europe. The absolutist government of Philip V and his Viceroy
Francisco Antonio Fernández de Velasco y Tovar, who imprisoned Narcís Feliu de la Penya,
the first person who reported the meteorite fall of Barcelona, for supporting Archduke
Charles of Austria, did not please people in Catalonia, who believed that their freedoms and
constitutions of Catalonia were increasingly being threatened. Opposition to Philip V grew
daily, and in the summer of 1705, there was an uprising in support of the Archduke Charles
16

of Austria, who was proclaimed in Catalonia as King Charles III of Spain. At that time Spain
therefore had two kings! Just a few months before these events, on no less a day than
Christmas Day 1704, there was the fall of the meteorite of Barcelona.
Immersed in this war environment, most of the historical records coincide in attributing a
divine origin to the event: the sign came from heaven and it was on a day as emblematic as
Christmas Day. People thought that this was a sign sent by God as a warning of the terrible
events that were taking place in Catalonia and throughout Europe in the War of the Spanish
Succession. The priest Patllari Ombravella Monell (?-1767) from the Sanctuary of Collell,
about 95 km NE of Barcelona (Fig. 1), wrote (in Catalan) (Constans 1950):

/…/ y en axó se formá pretenció donant
principi á la forta guerra y treballs, com se veu
per la experiencia y practicha; la qual se dona
a comprendrer (segons judici y experiencia de
homes vells) aquell gran Senyal de foch ques
veu lo día de Nadal lo any 1704 á la entrar del
fosch cerca del toch de la oració que aparagué
com una biga gran de fusta ensesa de foch
que baxava del Cel y anava passant sens
entretenirse; la qual se colgá y se perde de
veurer del costat que es entre Mitgdie mes
tirat a ponent; y al perdrer de veurer aquell se
hoya un gran estruendo en dita part com si fes
un tro molt profundo; e o be la terra tonas o
tremolas ab admiració dels hoyents, los quals
tots los experimentats y personas vellas deyen
que devia designar y asenyalar treballs o
guerra, com en realitat se veu y passa en
practica.

/.../ and with this the bloody war and the
hardships began, as evidenced by experience
and practice, which became evident
(according to the criteria and experience of
our elders) in that great fireball that we saw
on Christmas Day 1704 at dusk, approximately
at prayer time, when a sort of great beam of
burning wood appeared and fell from the sky
and crossed it without stopping, ceasing to be
visible when it was going in the direction
between midday tending more towards the
west. And when the signal was lost, there was
a great roar in that area, like very intense
thunder, as if the earth trembled, causing the
admiration of those who heard it, among
whom the most experienced and elderly
affirmed that the phenomenon indicated
hardships or war, as actually can be verified
and happens in practice.

A divine interpretation can be read in another document written in Catalan, in this case in
the memoirs of Francesc Gelat (1687-1722), a peasant from Santa Susanna, located on the
coast about 55 km NE from Barcelona (Fig. 1) (Pons i Guri 1959):

17

Tanbé noto que lo dia de Nadal de l’any 1704,
axís que lo sol se era post, aparagué un señal
com una gran barra de foc, que caigué del cel,
que causà gran espant. I caigué a la banda de
sol ponent, que nosaltres nos aparexia de
casa·nfora, que·l miràvem per sobra casa·n
Xirau, i després, al cap de mitx quart del señal,
sentíram un estruendo com si tiraven pessas i
moscateria, ab què totom judicà que Déu nos
enviava aquell señal per los treballs i guerra
que està passant. Avui, als 12 de matx de
1706, fas esta nota. Si Déu me dóna vida,
aniré continuant lo que soseirà…

I also record that on Christmas Day 1704, as
soon as the sun had set, there appeared a sign
similar to a great bar of fire, which fell from
the sky and caused great fright. And it
descended in the direction of the west and
we, watching it from our home, saw that it
passed over Xirau’s house. Then, after a half
quarter of an hour, we heard a roar similar to
cannon and musket fire, so that everyone
thought that God was sending us that sign
announcing the hardships and the war that we
are suffering. Today, May 12th of 1706, I write
this note. If God allows me to live, I will keep
writing down what will happen.

In the Historical Narrations of Francesc de Castellví, who fought for the Austriacist side, a
similar interpretation is found (Castellví 1997):

Estos presagios dio la naturaleza, instruida de
la Providencia; y aunque todos son vulgares
fenómenos, amenaza Dios con ellos para
correr a la enmienda de los vicios. Esto dio
asuntos a varias interpretaciones, según lo
vario de los efectos. Difundida la noticia en
Europa, muchos lo consideraron presagio de
lastimosos sucesos. En España se temió común
infortunio; en Cataluña, atemorizó a los más;
admiró a todos. A pocos les pareció preludio
de felicidades. Los más reflexivos discurrieron
vaticinio de sangrienta guerra en los límites de
la Corona de Aragón, y en particular en
Cataluña, y que la España toda sería
sangriento teatro de infelicidades. Todo el
vulgo lo tuvo a fatal agüero.

These omens were given by nature, instructed
by providence; and although they are all
common phenomena, God threatens us with
them to amend our sins. This resulted in
several interpretations due to the variety of
effects. Once the news spread in Europe,
many considered it a presage of pitiful events.
In Spain, common misfortune was feared; in
Catalonia, it frightened the bravest and
everyone admired it. Few people considered it
to be good news. The most thoughtful people
predicted a bloody war within the limits of the
Crown of Aragón, and particularly in Catalonia,
but also in Spain there would be a bloody
theater
of
unhappiness.
Everybody
interpreted it as a fatal omen.

The jurist Josep Plantí (~1680-?), judge of the Court of Sardinia during the war, tried to
reinforce the symbolism of the meteorite fall with cabalistic allusions to the coincidence of
the number five in the event. From the point of view of numerology, the number five was
18

considered magic; it was represented by the five-pointed star, the pentagon, represented
the fifth element (the ether), and identified the Phythagorean School through the
pentagram, etc. In his manuscript “On the death of Charles II King of Spain. On the defeat of
Catalonia and the destruction of Barcelona practically achieved” (De morte Caroli Secundi
Hispaniarum Rex. De excidio Cathaloniae nec non destructione Barcinonis quasi secundam),
Josep Plantí wrote (Alcoberro 2003):

El dia vint-i-cinc de desembre, començant l'any
cinquè del naixement del Senyor, segons el
còmput vulgar del segle XVIII; l'any cinquè del
pontificat de Climent XI; regnant per la
cinquena indicció a Espanya Felip V, i l'any
cinquè del seu regnat, a la cinquena setmana,
a la cinquena hora de vespre, al punt en què el
rellotge començava a marcar aquesta hora;
[…] un llamp va brillar al cel serè des de
l'orient. El globus es va encendre com el sol o
com la lluna plena damunt de Barcelona, cap
del Principat de Catalunya, amb el qual una
línia i el foc a la visió de tres colzes, feta des de
migjorn a septentrió, romangué durant un cert
temps, convertida en una línia de núvols, i a
poc a poc s'esvaí amb un soroll d'armes i de
tempestes bèl·liques. Aquest fet horrible el
vaig contemplar jo mateix: una cosa més
horrible no l'havia llegida excepte en les grans
desgràcies i derrotes i no sabria pas dir què
significava.

On the twenty-fifth of December, beginning
the fifth year of the birth of the Lord,
according to the common computation of the
eighteenth century; the fifth year of the
pontificate of Clement XI; in the fifth year of
the reign in Spain of Philip V, to the fifth week,
to the fifth hour of the evening, to the point in
which the clock began to chime this hour; [...]
a thunderbolt shone in the serene sky from
the East. The globe was lit like the Sun or like
the full moon over Barcelona, capital of the
Principality of Catalonia, with which a line and
fire to the vision of three cubits, moved from
noon to northerly, remained for a certain
time, changed into a line of clouds, and
gradually faded with a noise of weapons and
war storms. I watched this horrible event. I
had never observed a more horrible thing
except in great misfortunes and defeats and I
cannot say what it means.

From another perspective, the broadsheet “Complaints from Barcelona to the tyranny of the
Velasco’s government” (Clamors de Barcelona, al tirà govern de Velasco), a document
written in Catalan and issued in Barcelona to denounce the repression of Velasco (Viceroy of
Philip V) against Catalonia, starts with none other than verses that refer to the meteorite fall
(Anonymous 1705a):

19

Essent de tantas maneras los Catalans
vltrajats:
claman los de Barcelona á quin temps som
arribats.
En lo any mil set cents, y sinch en lo dia de
Nadal
volgue lo Cel avisarnos ab vn horroros senyal:
avìs era del molt mal que aquí aviam de
passar.

Being Catalans outraged in so many ways,
people from Barcelona complain about these
days.
In the year one thousand seven hundred and
four [1705 according to the old calendar] on
Christmas Day,
the sky wanted to warn us with a terrible sign:
it was a warning of the bad things we would
have to endure.

The Barcelona meteorite fall was also used for propaganda purposes. It is a similar case as
the well-known broadsheet written by Sebastian Brant (1457-1521) in 1492, which
attributed the fall of the famous Ensisheim meteorite on November 7th of 1492, to a divine
sign in favor of Maximilian I (1459-1519), Holy Roman Emperor, in his war against the King
of France, Charles VIII (1470-1498) (Marvin 1992). In the case of the Barcelona meteorite,
an exceptional document was written in 1705 by Joan Solar, a physician living in Barcelona,
who argued that the meteorite fall (along with other celestial phenomena such as the
passage of comets or planetary conjunctions) was a sign of heaven in favor of Archduke
Charles of Austria in the War of the Spanish Succession. The propaganda manuscript was
written in Spanish and printed in Barcelona and contains a beautiful engraving (Fig. 4),
which shows the fall of the stones from the sky, entitled “Christmas Day sign” (Señal del día
de Navidad) (Solar 1705):

Pues que dirè de aquel prodigiosos señal
Celeste, que sucediò el dia 25. De
Deziembre de 1704. Dia de la Navidad de
JESV-CHRISTO Nuestro Señor, que pareciò
mas milagroso, que natural /…/ De la
misma suerte sucederán los augmentos y
progresos de la Casa de Austria, y en
particular favorecerán dichos Influxos á
nuestro Rey, y Monarca CARLOS tercero.

What can I say about that prodigious
celestial sign, which happened on
December 25th of 1704, Christmas Day of
Jesus Christ Our Lord, which seemed more
miraculous, than natural /.../ The success
and progress of the Austrian Empire will
suffer the same fate, and in particular such
influences will favor our King and Monarch
Charles III.

20

Figure 4. Engraving that illustrated the writing of Joan Solar about the Barcelona meteorite fall. A set of
stones fall under a burning sky. (Biblioteca de Catalunya – Solar 1705).

In a similar way, in another broadsheet written in Spanish and printed in Barcelona in
1706 entitled “Naked truth armed with reason” (Verdad desnvda armada de razón),
the meteorite fall was also used to support Archduke Charles of Austria against Philip V
(Anonymous 1706):
Aun mayores señales han de convencerte:
acuerdate del horroroso, que sobre la
Ciudad de Barcelona se viò, y oyò dia de
Navidad (que fue à todo el Orbe notorio)
primer dia, según el computo Eclesiastico
del año 1705. dia 5. de la Semana, hora 5.
de la tarde, que causò a todos assombro;
Por el qual vn grande Astrologo (como lo
han comprobado los sucessos de otros
juizios) pronosticò ser señal, que avia de
acabar el gobierno de Felipe V.

Even more signs must convince you:
remember that horrible thing that was
seen and heard in the City of Barcelona on
Christmas Day (which became notorious
throughout the whole world) on the first
day of the year 1705, according to the
Ecclesiastic computation [December 25th of
1704], on the fifth of the week, at 5 o'clock
in the afternoon, and which surprised
everyone. A great Astrologer (as has been
verified in other occasions) predicted that
it was a sign indicating the end of the reign
of Philip V.

However, shortly afterwards, the propaganda carried out by the court of King Philip V,
issued a document in Catalan entitled “Catholic exhortation to the Catalan nation”
(Exortació Catholica dirigida a la Nació Catalana), where the Barcelona meteorite fall
was used as evidence of a divine warning. The document was addressed to the

21

Catalans to convince them of the usurpation committed by Archduke Charles
(Anonymous 1707):
La vinguda de nostre Rey Phelip Quint y sa
Coronaciò fou pacifica y aprobada per lo
Summo Prelàt que tenim en la Santa
Iglesia, lo qual encare lo aprobà; luego
aquest es lo Rey, que havèm de creurer,
vingùt de la ma de Deu; y que tota esta
conquista del Senyor Archiduch turbulenta,
y plena de abominacions, es una permissiò
Divina, en que han deixàt correr las cosas
ab las incitacions dels esperits diabolichs
per castich de nostras culpas, y pecats: com
ne tinguerem manifest avìs, y patent
amanasa ab aquell senyal de foch, y
estruendo extraordinari, que verem y
ohirem sobre nostra Ciutat de Barcelona, y
se difundi per tota Catalunya en lo Solemne
dia de festivitàt de Nadal del any 1704 à las
sinch horas de la tarda, en lo qual temps
(segons la experiencia nos ha ensenyàt), se
anava mes fortament fraguant la rebeldia,
y trahiciò en aquells que intentavan
introduir al Senyor Archiduch en Catalunya.

The arrival of our King Philip V and his
coronation was peaceful and approved by
the high priest of the Holy Church;
therefore he is the King, whom we have to
believe, appointed by the hand of God. All
the turbulent conquests of Lord Archduke
which are full of abominations and are
permitted by God, have happened with the
incitement of devilish spirits to punish our
guilt and sins. We received a clear warning
and threat with the sign of fire and
extraordinary noise that we saw and heard
over our city of Barcelona and which
spread throughout Catalonia on the
solemn Christmas Day of the year 1704 at
five in the afternoon, at the same time
(according to our experience) that the
rebellion and betrayal of those who were
trying to introduce Lord Archduke to
Catalonia were being strengthened.

In the beginning, the War of the Spanish Succession was favorable to Archduke Charles
of Austria, but an unexpected incident changed the course of events. In April 1711, the
Emperor of Austria, Joseph I, died, and his brother, who was none other than Archduke
Charles, inherited the crown of Austria. The kingdoms of the Great Alliance thought
that the possible alliance between Spain and Austria was even more threatening than
the alliance between Spain and France, and they decided to negotiate peace with the
King of France Louis XIV and recognize his grandson Philip V as the King of Spain
through the treaties of Utrecht (April 1713) and Rastatt (March 1714). Catalonia, which
supported Archduke Charles of Austria, was abandoned to its fate in spite of the Treaty
of Genoa signed in 1705, which established a political and military alliance between
the Kingdom of England and Catalonia. On September 11 1714, the Bourbon troops

22

invaded Barcelona and Catalonia lost all its political institutions through the
promulgation of the Decree of Nueva Planta (1716). In the Scientific Miscellany
(Miscel·lània científica) of Josep Bolló (1717), written in Barcelona after the war, the
meteorite fall was identified, without a doubt, as an omen of the war and the
subsequent fierce repression of the Catalans by Philip V (Fig. 3):

…y segons havem observat se pot dir que
era presagi de las misèrias y calamitats que
ha patit y pateix tot lo regne de España y
més en particular lo principat de
Cathalunya fins lo present añy de 1717.

…as we have observed, it can be said that it
was a presage of the miseries and
calamities that we have suffered and we
will continue to suffer in the Kingdom of
Spain and, in particular, in Catalonia until
the present year 1717.

Also in the “Prophetic key” (Llabe profetica), an epic text written in Spanish after the
war by the court of King Philip V to punish the supporters of Archduke Charles of
Austria, the meteorite fall was again ascribed to a divine action in favour of Philip V
(Anonymous 1713?):

Bien se viò en Cataluña la vispera de la
Natividad del Señor, año de 1704. donde se
admirò vn globo de luz, que venciédo la
negra obscuridad de las sombras, iluminò
los edificios de la Ciudad de Barcelona. Bien
se oyò la voz del Señor, que sobre las aguas
del Mediterraneo, en estruendosos ecos
horrorizò los animos. Bien se podían
prevenir por las señales que el Cielo
manifestò essa noche las desgracias que
amenazavan al Principado. /…/ Bien dezia
aquel Globo de fuego, que el enemigo se
acercava à sus puertas, bien mostrava la
ceniza q el Cielo lloviò en algunos Pueblos,
que las avrian al enemigo para su estrago.
/…/ Fue, pues, aquel Globo de fuego para

Cataluña indicio cierto de lo que ha
experimentado: fue pronostico de q queria
cumplirles Dios sus deseos para castigo
suyo.
A globe of light was seen in Catalonia on
the eve of Christmas Day in 1704, which,
overcoming the black darkness of the
shadows, illuminated the buildings of the
City of Barcelona. The voice of the Lord
was heard over the waters of the
Mediterranean, whose thunderous echoes
horrified our souls. The misfortunes that
threatened Catalonia could have been
prevented perfectly by the signs that
Heaven manifested that night. /.../ That

23

globe of fire clearly showed that the enemy
was approaching our doors, showing the
ash that rained from the sky in some
villages, which opened them to the enemy
for their destruction. /.../ That balloon of

fire was, therefore, a true indication of
what Catalonia has experienced. It was a
prognosis that God wanted to fulfill His
wishes for their punishment.

From all these historical documents it can be definitively concluded that the fall of the
meteorite caused great alarm among the local population. It has also been proved that
the fall was used as propaganda by both sides involved in the War of the Spanish
Succession in order to encourage or scare people (depending on the side involved) at a
time of scientific darkness dominated by the fear of God. This took place almost one
century before the well-known book Ironmasses by Chladni appeared in 1794, giving a
convincing scientific explanation for meteorite falls (Marvin 2007), and well before the
first chemical meteorite analysis (Sears and Sears 1977). Thanks to the quantity and
quality of the written documents found so far, the fall of the Barcelona meteorite
provides an invaluable opportunity to study the interpretation of meteorite falls in a
prescientific time.

4. Recovery of fragments in the Salvador Cabinet
We found the meteorite fragments of the Salvador collection in a glass jar referenced
as number 205 (Fig. 5) along with a small envelope with the annotation written in
Catalan “n°205 Meteorite?” (n°205 Meteorit?). Inside the envelope we discovered an
old label glued to a piece of paper. The label, written in Catalan, is incomplete and the
ink has lost density, but it is still possible to read: “Stone that fell from […] in […]1704”
(Pe[d]ra [que ca]ygué d’un […]u es[…] en […]y 1704) (Fig. 6). The whole set is currently
catalogued in the Salvador collection: reference Salv-8355.
Nothing is known about how the fragments of the meteorite reached the collections of
the Salvador family. Jaume Salvador i Pedrol (1649-1740), the patriarch, was already in
possession of a considerable number of specimens of animals, plants, minerals, fossils
and other curiosities, but it seems that the organization of those collections as a
museum or Cabinet did not begin until 1707, after his son Joan Salvador i Riera (1683-

24

1726) returned from his Great Tour along France and Italy to study botany and
chemistry with the best scholars of that time (Camarasa 2018). In 1710, Joan Salvador
accompanied the protophysician of Catalonia on a visit to apothecaries from different
cities in Catalonia, Terrassa among others (Jordi 1982). There they visited at least three
apothecaries. Therefore, we can hypothesize that someone from the Terrassa
apothecaries could have been in possession of some fragments of the Barcelona
meteorite and gave them to Joan Salvador.
The small envelope and its annotation could be dated near 1938, when the Salvador
Cabinet was acquired by Botanic Institute of Barcelona. Pius Font i Quer (1888-1964),
the founder of this institution, rescued this collection abandoned for more than a
century in a farmhouse thanks to a decree of the Generalitat de Catalunya (Ibáñez
2006). Probably, the glue used to fix the piece of paper also dated from this time. The
label, that could date from the 18th century, is originally from the Salvador family, but
it does not seem to have been handwritten by Jaume Salvador i Pedrol or Joan
Salvador i Riera (the most important members in the family); perhaps an amanuensis
transcribed the original data. The jar is made of mouth-blown glass, the traditional
method used in the 18th century.

Figure 5. Fragments of the Barcelona meteorite with their corresponding associated label, in the original
glass jar in which they were found in the Salvador Cabinet collection (Salv-8355).

25

Figure 6. Analysis of the label found in the glass jar where the meteorite fragments were preserved for
more than three centuries. The green line delimits the border of the old label and the red type
corresponds to the digital reconstruction of the text.

26

5. Analysis of the meteorite
5.1. Methodology
A polished thin section of the meteorite (~2.4 cm2) was obtained from the 49.8 g
fragment in the Laboratory of Paleontological and Geological Preparation (LPGiP) from
the MCNB in order to carry out petrographic and geochemical studies and its
corresponding classification. Previously, 3D digital models and replicas of the fragments
were carried out by the Conservation and Restoration Department of the MCNB. The
meteorite thin section was studied by petrographic microscopy and by scanning
electron microscopy (SEM), using a FEI Quanta 200 instrument operating at 15-20 kV
accelerating voltage and 5 nA beam current and equipped with an energy-dispersive
spectrometer at the Scientific and Technological Centres of the University of Barcelona
(CCiTUB) and at the Barcelona Research Center in Multiscale Science and Engineering
at the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC). Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA)
was performed on a JEOL JXA-8230 electron microprobe equipped with 5 wavelengthdispersive spectrometers (WDS) at the CCiTUB. Spot analyses were carried with an
accelerating voltage of 20 kV, a beam current of 15 nA, and a spot size of 1-2 microns.
Analytical standards used were: hematite (Fe, LIF, Kα), rutile (Ti, PET, Kα), periclase (Mg,
TAP, Kα), rhodonite (Mn, LIF, Kα), Al2O3 (Al, TAP, Kα), Cr2O3 (Cr, PET, Kα), diopside (Si,
TAP, Kα), sphalerite (Zn, LIF, Kα), NiO (Ni, LIF, Kα), wollastonite (Ca, PET, Kα), metallic
cobalt (Co, LIF, Kα), orthoclase (K, PET, Kα) and albite (Na, TAP, Kα). X-ray absorption
computed microtomography was performed at UPC on a Bruker Skyscan 1272
instrument at 70 kV, 114 µA, integration time of 600 ms and voxel size of 30 µm.
5.2. Description and petrography
The fragments of the Barcelona meteorite preserved in the Salvador Cabinet collection
weigh 49.8 and 33.7 g, respectively, and they are partially covered by a dark, smooth,
and shiny fusion crust, which is a clear indication that they were recovered shortly
after the fall (Fig. 7). Shock melt veins are abundant.

27

Figure 7. Detailed pictures of the Barcelona meteorite fragments (left, fragment of 49.8 g; right,
fragment of 33.7 g).

Figure 8 shows a general view of the thin section in transmitted, reflected, and crosspolarized light as well as in SEM backscattered electrons (BSE). Several chondrules with
an apparent diameter ranging from ca. 0.8 to 5 mm and shock melt veins are easily
recognized. The chondrules exhibit porphyritic olivine pyroxene (POP), barred olivine
(BO), granular olivine pyroxene (GOP) and radial pyroxene (RP) textures. Figure 9
shows representative SEM (BSE) images of shock melt veins, chondrules and matrix. Xray absorption computed microtomography performed in a volume of 0.83 cm3 reveals
that the meteorite contains about 3.1 vol% metallic Fe-Ni uniformly distributed.

28

Figure 8. Optical microscope images of the thin section of the Barcelona meteorite obtained with
transmitted light (a), cross-polarized light (b) SEM-BSE (c), and reflected light (d).

29

Figure 9. SEM (BSE) images of the Barcelona meteorite thin section. (a) Elongated fracture across an
olivine-rich chondrule surrounded by the typical mineral association: olivine (Ol), orthopyroxene (Opx),
plagioclase (Pl), kamacite (Kam) and chromite (Chr). (b) Poorly-defined olivine (Ol) chondrule
surrounded by troilite (Tro) and kamacite (Kam) and accessory orthopyroxene (Opx) and plagioclase (Pl).
(c) Typical elongated barred texture comprised of alternating bands of olivine (Ol) and combined
orthopyroxene (Opx) – plagioclase (Pl). (d,e) Subhedral to anhedral troilite (Tro) and kamacite (Kam)
grains associated with a silicate matrix formed by olivine (Ol), orthopyroxene (Opx) and plagioclase (Pl)
with accessory chromite (Chr). (f) Quenched melt vein with metal blebs composed of an intergrowth of
metal and troilite.

30

5.3. Mineral chemistry
Table 1 shows the mean compositions of metal and sulfide phases as obtained by
electron microprobe analysis. The composition of kamacite is 93.5 ± 1.4 wt% Fe, 5.5 ±
1.6 wt% Ni and 0.9 ± 0.1 wt% Co, and that of taenite is 82.6 ± 2.8 wt% Fe, 16.3 wt% Ni
(range of 11.7-26.4 wt%) and 0.7 wt% Co (range of 0.3-0.8 wt%). Tetrataenite is also
present (Table 1). The composition of troilite is very homogeneous, 63.0 ± 0.3 wt% Fe
and 37.0 ± 0.2 wt% S. Table 2 shows the mean compositions of silicate phases and
chromite as obtained by electron microprobe analysis. The olivine composition is Fa
25.8 ± 0.2 mol% (range of 25.4-26.8 mol%), the low-Ca pyroxene composition is Fs 21.7
± 0.3 mol% (range of 20.4-23.6 mol%), Wo 1.4 ± 0.2 mol% (range of 0.9-1.9 mol%), and
the plagioclase composition is Ab 84.2 ± 0.7 mol% (range of 82.7-85.6 mol%), Or 5.6 ±
0.5 mol% (range of 4.4-6.7 mol%). Figure 10 shows the chromite composition of the
Barcelona meteorite along with mean values for H, L and LL ordinary chondrites
(Boschi et al. 2017, Bunch et al. 1967, Wlotzka 2005). All the EPMA data has been
tabulated as a single file that is available as an electronic supplement.

Table 1. Mean compositions (wt%) of metal and sulfide phases.

nr. of grains
Si
Mn
Fe
Co
Ni
P
S
Total

Troilite
18
<0.1
<0.1
63.0±0.3
<0.1
<0.1
37.0±0.2
100.3±0.4

Kamacite
10
93.5±1.4
0.9±0.1
5.5±1.6
<0.1
100.0±0.3

31

Taenite
25
82.6±2.8
0.7±0.1
16.3±3.1
<0.1
99.6±0.6

Tetrataenite
2
46.6±1.2
0.1
52.4±0.5
99.3±0.2

Table 2. Mean compositions (wt%) of silicate phases and chromite.

nr. of grains
SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
Cr2O3
FeO
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
NiO
CoO
Total
End-member

Olivine
36
38.1±0.7
<0.1
23.9±1.0
0.5±0.1
38.4±1.0
<0.1
<0.1
101.0±0.3
Fa25.8±0.2

Low-Ca pyroxene
25
55.7±1.7
0.17±0.08
0.15±0.05
<0.1
14.5±0.3
0.50±0.04
28.9±3.4
0.7±0.3
<0.1
100.7±0.7
Fs21.7±0.3
Wo1.4±0.2

Plagioclase
20
66.0±1.7
21.1±0.6
2.2±0.1
10.0±1.0
1.0±0.2
100.4±0.8
Ab84.2±0.7
Or5.6±0.5

Chromite
28
0.2±0.1
2.8±1.0
5.5±1.2
56.1±1.6
31.7±1.7
0.55±0.13
2.3±1.4
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
99.2±0.8

Figure 10. Plot of the chromite composition of the Barcelona meteorite along with mean values for H, L,
and LL ordinary chondrites (Boschi et al. 2017).

32

5.4. Classification
The chemical composition of olivine and low-Ca pyroxene, together with the Co
content in kamacite and the total metal content of the meteorite, are in the range of Lgroup chondrites (Fig. 11) (Rubin 1990). Also, the plagioclase composition coincides
well with the composition of L chondrites (van Schmus et al. 1968). The homogeneity
of the mafic silicate compositions, the definition of the chondrules, the occurrence of
>50 µm plagioclase grains, the absence of diopside grains in the matrix and the
recrystallized texture indicate petrologic type 6 (Van Schmus et al. 1967; Krot et al.
2014). The occurrence of weak mosaicism and sets of planar fractures in the olivine
grains, as well as the occurrence of melt pockets with interconnecting veins indicate a
shock stage of S4 (Stöffler et al. 1991). Some silicate staining is observed in both
specimens (Figures 7 and 8a), but the absence of oxide rims around metal and troilite
and hydroxide rims indicate a weathering grade of W0 (Zurfluh et al. 2016).
Considering the original label conserved in the glass jar where the meteorite fragments
were preserved and the time when the members of the Salvador family collected the
Cabinet, it is very unlikely that the meteorites preserved could correspond to another
meteorite fall in Catalonia. However, and for the sake of clarity, we have plotted in Fig.
11 the data corresponding to the other four known Catalan meteorites: Nulles fall in
1851 (Williams et al. 1985), Cañellas fall in 1861 (Casanova et al. 1990), Gerona find in
1899 (Casanova et al. 1990) and Garraf find in 1905 (Keil et al. 1986). Clearly, the
Barcelona meteorite cannot be confused with any of them.

33

Figure 11. Plot of (a) the mean olivine and pyroxene compositions and (b) Co content in kamacite of the
Barcelona meteorite along with mean values for H, L, and LL ordinary chondrites (Rubin 1990, Grossman
et al. 2006). The olivine and pyroxene compositions of the other Catalan meteorites are included for
comparison.

6. Conclusions
A meteorite fall occurred on Christmas Day of 1704, at about 17:00 h (UT) over
Terrassa (41°34’N, 2°03’E), about 25 km NW of the city of Barcelona. The meteorite fall
was widely recorded in numerous historical documents. These testimonies reported
that the meteorite originated as a fireball that was seen across the western
Mediterranean in a clear sky, creating intense sound waves that were heard more than
100 km away. It was reported that several fragments weighing up to 5 kg fell in several
places in Terrassa, separated by approximately 5 km. Two of these fragments
remained unnoticed in the Salvador Cabinet collection (Botanic Institute of Barcelona)
for more than 300 years. In the present work we have disclosed their existence and
have analyzed them. The specimens (49.8 and 33.7 g) are very well preserved and are
partly covered by a fresh fusion crust, indicating that they were recovered shortly after
they fell. The meteorite is classified as a L6 chondrite. The Barcelona meteorite fall is a

34

valuable example of the role of meteorites in history. It occurred during the War of
Spanish Succession, one of the most important conflicts in the history of Europe, and it
was interpreted as a divine sign and also used for propaganda purposes. The Barcelona
meteorite is the third oldest preserved meteorite in Europe and the seventh in the
world.

Acknowledgments
This work has been funded by the Institut d’Estudis Catalans, project PRO2018-S03.
Jordi Llorca is a Serra Húnter Fellow and is grateful to ICREA Academia program and GC
2017 SGR 128. We thank Xavier Llovet and David Artiaga from the CCiTUB for their
assistance in the EPMA and SEM analyses, respectively, and to Michela Romanini and
Montserrat Domínguez from UPC for their assistance in the X-ray μCT analyses. We
would like to acknowledge the collaboration of Gerard Lucena, Marta Pérez-Azcárate
and Jordi Cadevall from the MCNB for their work in the elaboration of the thin section
and replicas of the meteorite fragments. We are grateful to Pauline Ernest (Open
University of Catalonia) for her translations of the historical documents and assistance
in English language editing. We also thank Adrian Brearley, Alan Rubin, Addi Bischoff,
and Jonathan Lewis, who made some very helpful suggestions for improving the
manuscript.

References
Alcoberro A. 2003. Memòria, història i pensament polític a l’exili austriacista. La crònica de la
Guerra de Successió de Josep Plantí. Pedralbes: Revista d'Història Moderna 23:325–344.
Anonymous. 1704. Veridica relacion, venida de la civdad de Barcelona â esta Ciudad de Zaragoza, â
28 de Deziembre de 1704. Zaragoza: F. Revilla. 3 p.
Anonymous. 1705a. Clamors de Barcelona al tirà govern de Velasco. Barcelona: Imp. Joan Jolis. p. 1.
Anonymous. 1705b. Mémoires pour l’histoire des Sciences & des Beaux-arts, recueillies par ordre
de Son Altesse Ser. Mons. Prince Souverain de Dombes. Trevoux: Impr. de S. A. S. p. 710-711.

35

Anonymous. 1705c. Observations de Physique Generale. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des
Sciences. Paris: Impr. Jean Boudot. p. 34-35.
Anonymous. 1706. Verdad desnuda armada de razón. Barcelona: R. Figueró. p. 14.
Anonymous. 1707. Exortació Cathòlica dirigida a la Nació Catalana. València. p. 27-28.
Anonymous. 1713?. Llabe profètica, theatro de pasiones y clarín castellano. Madrid: Imp. J Bot. p.2.
Arago D. F. J. 1855. Popular Astronomy. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans. p. 162.
Aragonés E. 2008. El meteorit de Terrassa (25 de desembre de 1704). Terme 23:85–110.
Aragonés E. 2015. Bòlids i meteorits a Catalunya: una història (1700-1936). Notícies de Natura
28:1–32.
Aurell-Garrido J. “Informe del Meteorit Salv-8355 del Museu Salvador”, 2015.
Belando N. J. 1740. Historia civil de España, successos de la guerra, y tratados de paz, desde el año
de mil setecientos, hasta el de mil setecientos y treinta y tres. Madrid: Impr. M. Fernández.
Vol. 1, p. 228.
Bolló J. 1717. Miscelánea científica ilustrada. Barcelona. p. 122.
Boschi S., Schmitz B., Heck P. R., Cronholm A., Defouilloy C., Kita N. T., Monechi S., Montanari A.,
Rout S. S., and Terfelt F. 2017. Late Eocene 3He and Ir anomalies associated with ordinary
chondritic spinels. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 204:205–218.
Bruniquer E. G. 1916. Rúbriques de Bruniquer. Cerimonial dels Magnífics Consellers i Regiment de
la Ciutat de Barcelona. Barcelona: Ajuntament de Barcelona. Vol. 5, p. 12-13.
Bunch T. E., Keil K., and Snetsinger K. G. 1967. Chromite composition in relation to chemistry and
texture of ordinary chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 31:1569–1582.
Camarasa J. M. 2018. Descripcions i notícies del gabinet Salvador en llibres de viatges, guies i altres
documents impresos (1713-1895). Collectanea Botanica 37:e001.
Casanova I., Keil K., Wieler R., San Miguel A., and King E. A. 1990. Origin and history of chondrite
regolith, fragmental and impact-melt breccias from Spain. Meteoritics 25: 127–135.
Castellví F. 1997). Narraciones históricas desde el año 1700 hasta el año 1725. Madrid: Fundación
Francisco Elías de Tejada. Vol. 1, 722 p.
Constans L. 1950. Una crònica inèdita de la Guerra de Successió. Anales de Estudios Gerundenses
5:73–112.
Chladni E. F. F. 1826. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Feuermeteore und der herabgefallenen
Massen. Annalen der PhysiK 1:45–60.
Faura i Sans M. 1921. Meteorits caiguts a Catalunya. Butlletí del Centre Excursionista de Catalunya
31:270–288.
Feliu de la Peña N. 1709. Anales de Cataluña. Barcelona: J.P. Martí, Vol. 3, p. 530.
Galí J. B. 1993. Llibre de notes dels hereus de Can Torres. Matadepera 1699-1824. Terme 8:29–37.

36

Ginebra R. 2005. Guerra, pau i vida quotidiana en primera persona: el llibre de memòries de Bernat
Puigcarbó de Muntanyola (s. XVI-XVII), el llibre de notes de Francesc Joan Lleopart de
Vilalleons (s. XVII-XVIII), i els llibres de comptes i notes dels hereus Quatrecases de Pruit (16861812). Vic: Ed. Patronat d’Estudis Osonencs. p. 178.
Greg R. P. 1861. A Catalogue of Meteorites and Fireballs from AD 2 to AD 1860. Proceedings XIIIth
Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. p. 48-118.
Grossman J. and Rubin A. 2006. White paper report for the Nomenclature Committee on the
composition

of

olivine

and

pyroxene

in

equilibrated

ordinary

chondrites.

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/docs/whitepaper.pdf
Ibáñez N. 2006. Estudis sobre cinc herbaris històrics de l’Institut Botànic de Barcelona. Ph.D. thesis,
University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi R. 1982. Visita de boticas en Cataluña a principios del siglo XVIII (16-3-1710/10-4-1710).
Circular Farmacéutica 274:111–139.
Keil K., Conrad G. H., King E. A., and San Miguel A. 1986. Petrology and classification of the Garraf,
Spain chondrite. Meteoritics 21: 125–129.
Krot A. N., Keil K., Scott E. R. D. Goodrich C. A., and Weisberg M. K. 2014. Classification of
meteorites and their genetic relationships. In Meteorites and Cosmochemical Processes,
edited by Davis, A. M. Oxford: Elsevier. p 1-63.
Llorca J. 2004. El meteorito de la Guerra de Sucesión española. In Meteoritos y cráteres.
Fragmentos de otros mundos que caen en la Tierra, Lleida: Ed. Milenio. p. 70-94.
Llorca J., Trigo J.M., and Vega S. 2002. The Meteorite Fall of 1704 at Barcelona (abstract #5035).
Meteoritics & Planetary Science 37:A89.
Llorca J. and Vega S. 2004. El meteorit que va precedir la Guerra de Successió. Foc sobre Terrassa.
Sàpiens 17:36–39.
Marvin U. B. 1992. The meteorite of Ensisheim: 1492 to 1992. Meteoritics 27:28–72.
Marvin U. B. 2007. Ernst Florens Friedrich Chladni (1756–1827) and the origins of modern
meteorite research. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42:B3–B68.
Mas y Soldevila M. 1705. Diari des del mes de noembre del anÿ 1700, fins lo die 14 de octubre del
anÿ 1705. Barcelona. p. 505.
Pons Guri J. M. 1959-60. Llibre de comptas i notas de Francisco Gelat, pagès de Santa Susanna,
parròquia de Santa Maria de Pineda y Terma de Palafolls, bisbat de Gerona, comensat de
escriura vuy, als 17 de setembre de 1698. [1698-1722]. Circular del Archivo Histórico y Museo
Fidel Fita 2:3–15, 3:2–12, 6:11–14.
Rubin A. E. 1990. Kamacite and olivine in ordinary chondrites: Intergroup and intragroup
relationships. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 54:1217–1232.

37

Sears D. W. and Sears H. 1977. Sketches in the history of meteoritics 2: The early chemical and
mineralogical work. Meteoritics 12:27–46.
Solar J. 1705. Juizio sobre el celeste señal que sucedió en el dia 23. del mes de Noviembre deste
presente Año 1705. que es la confirmación de aquel prodigioso Señal, que se vió en 25. de
Deziembre de 1704. dia de la Natividad de Jesu-Christo Nuestro Señor, que tanto ha dado que
discurrir á los curiosos. Barcelona: Impr. B. Giralt. 4 p.
Stöffler D., Keil K., and Scott, E. R. D. 1991. Shock metamorphism of ordinary chondrites.
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 55:3845–3867.
Van Schmus W. R. and Wood J. 1967. A chemical–petrologic classification for the chondritic
meteorites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 31:747–765.
Van Schmus W. R. and Ribbe P. H. 1968. The composition and structural state of feldspar from
chondritic meteorites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 32:1327–1342.
Ventalló J. 1879. Tarrasa antigua y moderna. Ensayo histórico. Terrassa: Impr. La Industrial. 330 p.
Williams C. V., Rubin A. E., Keil K., and San Miguel A. 1990. Petrology of the Cangas de Onis and
Nulles regolith breccias: Implications for parent body history. Meteoritics 20:331–345.
Wlotzka F. 2005. Cr spinel and chromite as petrogenetic indicators in ordinary chondrites:
equilibration temperatures of petrologic types 3.7 to 6. Meteoritics & Planetary Science
40:1673–1702.
Zurfluh F. J., Hofmann B. A., Gnos E., Eggenberger U., and Jull A. J. T. 2016. Weathering of ordinary
chondrites from Oman: Correlation of weathering parameters with 14C terrestrial ages and a
refined weathering scale. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 51:1685–1700.

38