Comparative study of different numerical models of packed bed thermal energy storage systems

dc.contributor.author
Oró Prim, Eduard
dc.contributor.author
Chiu, Justin
dc.contributor.author
Martin, Viktoria
dc.contributor.author
Cabeza, Luisa F.
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-05T21:22:16Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-05T21:22:16Z
dc.date.issued
2015-02-03T08:42:28Z
dc.date.issued
2025-01-01
dc.date.issued
2013
dc.identifier
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.07.020
dc.identifier
1359-4311
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/47817
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/47817
dc.description.abstract
This paper presents, compares and validates two different mathematical models of packed bed storage with PCM, more specifically the heat transfer during charge of the PCM. The first numerical model is a continuous model based on the Brinkman equation and the second numerical model treats the PCM capsules as individual particles (energy equation model). Using the Brinkman model the flow field inside the porous media and the heat transfer mechanisms present in the packed bed systems can be described. On the other hand, using the energy equation model the temperature gradient inside the PCM capsules can be analysed. Both models are validated with experimental data generated by the authors. The experimental set up consists mainly of a cylindrical storage tank with a capacity of 3.73 L full of spherically encapsulated PCM. The PCM used has a storage capacity of 175 kJ/kg between 2e13 C. The results from the energy equation model show a basic understanding of cold charging. Moreover, three different Nu correlations found in the literature were analysed and compared. All of them showed the same temperature profile of the PCM capsules; hence any of them could be used in future models. The comparison between both mathematical models indicated that free convection is not as important as forced convection in the studied case.
dc.description.abstract
The work is partially funded by the Spanish government (ENE2008-06687-C02-01/CON and ENE2011-22722). The authors would like to thank the Catalan Government for the quality accreditation given to their research group GREA (2009 SGR 534). Eduard Oró would like to thank University of Lleida for his research fellowship and COST ACTION TU08002 for his STSM fellowship.
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.relation
MICINN/PN2008-2011/ENE2008-06687-C02-01/CON
dc.relation
MICINN/PN2008-2011/ENE2011-22722
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.07.020
dc.relation
Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, vol. 50, p. 384-392
dc.rights
(c) Elsevier, 2012
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subject
Phase change material
dc.subject
Packed bed
dc.subject
Numerical simulation
dc.title
Comparative study of different numerical models of packed bed thermal energy storage systems
dc.type
article
dc.type
publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)