Comparative life cycle assessment of thermal energy storage systems for solar power plants

Publication date

2015-02-04T11:14:54Z

2025-01-01

2012



Abstract

The present work compares the environmental impact of three different thermal energy storage (TES) systems for solar power plants. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for these systems is developed: sensible heat storage both in solid (high temperature concrete) and liquid (molten salts) thermal storage media, and latent heat storage which uses phase change material (PCM). The aim of this paper is to analyze if the energy savings related to the stored energy of the different systems are enough to balance the environmental impact produced during the manufacturing and operation phase of each storage system. Some hypothetical scenarios are studied using LCA methodology to point out the differences between each TES system. The system based on solid media, due to his simplicity, shows the lowest environmental impact per kWh stored of all three systems compared. In addition, the liquid media (molten salts) shows the highest impact per kWh stored because it needs more material and complex equipment.


The work was partially funded by the Spanish government (projects ENE2008-06687-C02-01/CON, CTQ2009-14420-C02, DPI2008-04099I, A/023551/09, and ENE2011-22722). Antoni Gil would like to thank the Col·legi d’Enginyers Industrials de Catalunya for his research appointment. The authors would like to thank the Catalan Government for the quality accreditation given to their research group (2009 SGR 534). Eduard Oró would like to thank the University of Lleida for his research fellowship.

Document Type

article


publishedVersion

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

LCA; PCM; Thermal energy storage

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

MICINN/PN2008-2011/ENE2008-06687-C02-01/CON

MICINN/PN2008-2011/CTQ2009-14420-C02

MICINN/PN2008-2011/DPI2008-04099I

MICINN/PN2008-2011/A/023551/09

MICINN/PN2008-2011/ENE2011-22722

Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.008

Renewable Energy, 2012, vol. 44, p. 166-173

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

(c) Elsevier, 2012

This item appears in the following Collection(s)