dc.contributor.author
Feliu, Jaime
dc.contributor.author
Safont, M. J.
dc.contributor.author
Salud Salvia, Maria Antonieta
dc.contributor.author
Losa, F.
dc.contributor.author
García-Girón, C.
dc.contributor.author
Bosch, Carlos
dc.contributor.author
Escudero, P.
dc.contributor.author
López, R.
dc.contributor.author
Madroñal, C.
dc.contributor.author
Bolaños, M.
dc.contributor.author
Gil, M.
dc.contributor.author
Llombart, A.
dc.contributor.author
Castro-Carpeño, J.
dc.contributor.author
González-Barón, M.
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-05T22:25:26Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-05T22:25:26Z
dc.date.issued
2015-07-09T10:39:46Z
dc.date.issued
2025-01-01
dc.identifier
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605663
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/48457
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/48457
dc.description.abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of capecitabine and bevacizumab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
considered unsuitable for receiving first-line chemotherapy with an irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based combination were assessed in a
phase II, open, multicentre, uncontrolled study.
METHODS: Treatment consisted of capecitabine 1250 mgm 2 (or 950 mgm 2 for patients with a creatinine clearance of
30–50ml min 1) twice daily on days 1–14 and bevacizumab (7.5 mg kg 1) on day 1 every 3 weeks.
RESULTS: A total of 59 patients aged X70 years with mCRC were enrolled. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate
was 34%, with 71% of patients achieving disease control. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.8 months and
18 months, respectively. In all, 32 patients (54%) had grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), the most common being hand–foot syndrome
(19%), diarrhoea (9%) and deep venous thrombosis (7%). Four patients died because of treatment-related AEs. A relationship was
detected between creatinine clearance p50 ml min 1 and the development of non-bevacizumab-related grade 3/4 AEs. The
incidence of bevacizumab-associated AEs (hypertension, thromboembolic events and proteinuria) was consistent with that of
previous reports in elderly patients.
CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with capecitabine represents a valid therapeutic alternative in elderly patients considered to be
unsuitable for receiving polychemotherapy.
dc.publisher
Nature Publishing Group
dc.publisher
Cancer Research UK
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605663
dc.relation
British Journal of Cancer, 2010, vol. 102, p. 1468-1473
dc.rights
(c) Cancer Research UK, 2010
dc.rights
(c) Nature Publishing Group, 2010
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subject
colorectal neoplasms
dc.title
Capecitabine and bevacizumab as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer