Autor/a

Bittner, Martin-Immanuel

Donnelly, Maria

Van Zanten, Arthur R. H

Andersen, Jakob Steen

Guidet, Bertrand

Trujillano Cabello, Javier

Gardiner, Shane

Fitzpatrick, Gerard

Winter, Bob

Joannidis, Michael

Schmutz, Axel

Fecha de publicación

2015-11-23T13:47:34Z

2015-11-23T13:47:34Z

2013-11



Resumen

Reimbursement schemes in intensive care are more complex than in other areas of healthcare, due to special procedures and high care needs. Knowledge regarding the principles of functioning in other countries can lead to increased understanding and awareness of potential for improvement. This can be achieved through mutual exchange of solutions found in other countries. In this review, experts from eight European countries explain their respective intensive care unit reimbursement schemes. Important conclusions include the apparent differences in the countries' reimbursement schemes-despite all of them originating from a DRG system-, the high degree of complexity found, and the difficulties faced in several countries when collecting the data for this collaborative work. This review has been designed to assist the intensivist clinician and researcher in understanding neighbouring countries' approaches and in putting research into the context of a European perspective. In addition, steering committees and decision makers might find this a valuable source to compare different reimbursement schemes.

Tipo de documento

article
publishedVersion

Lengua

Inglés

Materias y palabras clave

Intensive care unit; Intensive care economics; Reimbursement; DRG system; Unitat de cures intensives

Publicado por

SpringerOpen

Documentos relacionados

Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-37

Annals of intensive care, 2013, vol. 3, núm. 37, p. 1-9

Derechos

cc-by (c) Bittner et al., 2013

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)