LIDAR as an alternative to passive collectors to measure pesticide spray drift

Author

Gregorio López, Eduard

Rosell Polo, Joan Ramon

Sanz Cortiella, Ricardo

Rocadenbosch Burillo, Francesc

Solanelles Batlle, Francesc

Garcerá, Cruz

Chueca, Patricia

Arnó Satorra, Jaume

Moral Martínez, Ignacio del

Masip Vilalta, Joan

Camp, Ferran

Viana, R.G.

Escolà i Agustí, Alexandre

Gràcia, Felip

Planas de Martí, Santiago

Moltó García, Enrique

Publication date

2016-01-18T12:39:39Z

2016-01-31T03:31:11Z

2014



Abstract

Pesticide spray drift entails a series of risks and costs in terms of human, animal and environmental well-being. A proper understanding of this phenomenon is essential to minimise these risks. However, most conventional methods used in drift measurement are based on point collectors which are unable to obtain information concerning the temporal or spatial evolution of the pesticide cloud. Such methods are also costly, labour-intensive, and require a considerable amount of time. The aim of this paper is to propose a method to measure the spray drift based on lidar (LIght Detection And Ranging) and to prove that it can be an alternative to passive collectors. An analytical model is proposed to relate the measurements obtained through passive collectors and those obtained with lidar systems considering several spray application and meteorological parameters. The model was tested through an experimental campaign involving multiple ground spray tests. A lidar system and two types of passive collectors (nylon strings and water-sensitive paper) were used simultaneously to measure the drift. The results showed for each test a high coefficient of determination (R2 ≈ 0.90) between the lidar signal and the tracer mass captured by the nylon strings. This coefficient decreased (R2 = 0.77) when all tests were considered together. Lidar measurements were also used to study the evolution of the pesticide cloud with high range (1.5 m) and temporal resolution (1 s) and to estimate its velocity. Furthermore, a very satisfactory adjustment (R2 = 0.89) was observed between the tracer mass collected by the nylon lines and the coverage on water-sensitive paper sheets. These results are in accordance with the proposed analytical model and allow the conclusion that the application and meteorological parameters can be considered spatially invariant for a given test but are not invariant for different tests.


This research was partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (projects AGL2007-66093-C04 and AGL2010-22304-C04) and EU FEDER.

Document Type

article
acceptedVersion

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

Light detection and ranging; Remote sensing; Sprayer; Droplet; Pesticides; Teledetecció; Sensors

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MEC//AGL2007-66093-C04-01/ES/REDUCCION DEL USO DE PRODUCTOS FITOSANITARIOS EN CULTIVOS ARBOREOS. GENERACION Y VALIDACION DE MODELOS DE DEPOSICION Y DERIVA PARA EL ESTABLECIMIENTO DE DOSIS OPTIMAS/

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//AGL2010-22304-C04-01/ES/ESTRATEGIAS INTEGRALES PARA UNA UTILIZACION DE FITOSANITARIOS SEGURA Y EFICAZ. GENERACION DE CONOCIMIENTOS SOBRE LOS FENOMENOS DE DERIVA Y APLICACION EN MEDIDAS PALIATIVAS/

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MEC//AGL2007-66093-C04-03/ES/REDUCCION DEL USO DE PRODUCTOS FITOSANITARIOS EN CULTIVOS ARBOREOS. OPTIMIZACION DE LA DOSIS DE APLICACION EN TRATAMIENTOS MECANIZADOS DE FRUTALES/

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MEC//AGL2007-66093-C04-04/ES/REDUCCION DEL USO DE PRODUCTOS FITOSANITARIOS EN CULTIVOS ARBOREOS. OPTIMIZACION DE LA DOSIS DE APLICACION EN CITRICOS, FRUTALES Y VID/

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//AGL2010-22304-C04-03/ES/ESTRATEGIAS INTEGRALES PARA UNA UTILIZACION DE FITOSANITARIOS SEGURA Y EFICAZ. PULVERIZACION DE PRECISION Y MONITORIZACION DE LA DERIVA EN FRUTICULTURA/

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//AGL2010-22304-C04-04/ES/ESTRATEGIAS INTEGRALES PARA UNA UTILIZACION DE FITOSANITARIOS SEGURA Y EFICAZ. PULVERIZACION INTELIGENTE EN VIÑA/

Versió postprint del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.028

Atmospheric Environment, 2014, vol. 82, p. 83-93

Rights

(c) Elsevier, 2014

This item appears in the following Collection(s)