dc.contributor.author
Alves, Rui
dc.contributor.author
Antunes, Fernando
dc.contributor.author
Salvador, Armindo
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-05T21:41:12Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-05T21:41:12Z
dc.date.issued
2016-05-26T08:01:44Z
dc.date.issued
2025-01-01
dc.identifier
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0606-667
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/57099
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/57099
dc.description.abstract
The number of software packages for kinetic modeling of
biochemical networks continues to grow. Although most
packages share a common core of functionality, the specific
capabilities and user interfaces of different packages mean
that choosing the best package for a given task is not trivial.
We compare 12 software packages with respect to their
functionality, reliability, efficiency, user-friendliness and
compatibility. Although most programs performed reliably in all
numerical tasks tested, SBML compatibility and the set-up of
multicompartmentalization are problematic in many packages.
For simple models, GEPASI seems the best choice for nonexpert
users. For large-scale models, environments such as
Jarnac/JDesigner are preferable, because they allow modular
implementation of models. Virtual Cell is the most versatile
program and provides the simplest and clearest functionality
for setting up multicompartmentalization.
dc.publisher
Nature Publishing Group
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0606-667
dc.relation
Nature Biotechnology, 2006, vol. 24, núm. 6, p. 667-672
dc.rights
(c) Nature Publishing Group, 2006
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.title
Tools for kinetic modeling of biochemical networks