dc.contributor.author
González García, Ulises Alejandro
dc.contributor.author
Corona, Luis
dc.contributor.author
Castrejon Pineda, Francisco
dc.contributor.author
Balcells Terés, Joaquim
dc.contributor.author
Castelan Ortega, Octavio
dc.contributor.author
González Ronquillo, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-05T21:23:02Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-05T21:23:02Z
dc.date.issued
2016-12-05T09:41:06Z
dc.date.issued
2016-12-05T09:41:06Z
dc.identifier
https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1250642
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/58770
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/58770
dc.description.abstract
This study compares in situ, in vitro (DaisyII and gas production) and in vivo techniques to estimate the
degradation of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), and N of sorghum grain. We used whole dried
sorghum (WDS), dry cracked sorghum (DCS), the reconstituted whole sorghum silage (WSS) and
reconstituted cracked sorghum silage (CSS). The residues obtained from the ruminal digestion in vitro
(DaisyII) and in situ were analysed for their intestinal digestion (pepsin–pancreatin). OM was similar
(981.32 ± 0.52) in all treatments, WSS showed the highest (P < .001) crude protein (CP) concentration
compared with the other treatments, whereas CSS showed the highest amount of starch (P < .001)
compared to other treatments. The apparent degraded substrate (ADS) was higher (P < .038) for whole
sorghums, rumen degradable protein (RDP) was higher for WDS and WSS (P = .003), while protein
digestible in the intestine (PDI) was higher for sorghums silage (P < .001) compared with dry sorghums.
ADS was higher (P < .022) using the in sacco technique compared with the other methods, while for
the RDP and PDI methods in sacco and in vitro (Daisy) showed the better degradation compared with
in vivo. The reconstituted ensiling sorghum grains had a favourable response in the availability of
nutrients, compared with dried sorghums.
dc.description.abstract
This work was supported by the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico under [grant number PAPIIT-DGAPA-UNAM IN206006].
dc.publisher
Taylor & Francis
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1250642
dc.relation
Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2016, p. 1-9
dc.rights
cc-by (c) González García, Ulises Alejandro. et al., 2016
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.title
A comparison of processed sorghum grain using different digestion techniques