Management Options for Multiple Herbicide–Resistant Corn Poppy (Papaver rhoeas) in Spain

Author

Rey Caballero, Jordi

Royo-Esnal, Aritz

Recasens i Guinjuan, Jordi

González, Ignacio

Torra Farré, Joel

Publication date

2017-07-20T07:51:51Z

2017



Abstract

Corn poppy is the most widespread broadleaf weed infesting winter cereals in Europe. Biotypes that are resistant (R) to both 2,4-D and tribenuron-methyl have evolved in recent decades, thus complicating their chemical control. In this study, field experiments at two locations over three seasons were conducted to evaluate the effects of different weed management strategies on corn poppy resistant to 2,4-D and tribenuron-methyl, including crop rotations, delayed sowing and different herbicide programs. After 3 yr, all integrated weed management (IWM) strategies reduced the initial density of corn poppy, although the most successful strategies were those which either included a suitable crop rotation (sunflower or field peas), or had a variation in the herbicide application timing (early POST or combining PRE or early POST and POST). The efficacy of IWM strategies differed between both locations, possibly due to different population dynamics and the genetic basis of herbicide resistance. Integrated management of multiple herbicide–resistant corn poppy is necessary in order to reduce selection pressure by herbicides, mitigate the evolution of new R biotypes, and reduce the weed density in highly infested fields.


The authors gratefully acknowledge Dow Agro- Sciences for funding the trials. They thank E. Edo, L. Pallares, L. Mateu, and N. Moix for their help in the field trials. Rey-Caballero was funded by Ph.D. grants from the Agència de Gestió d ’ Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (FI-2013) from Generalitat de Catalunya.

Document Type

article
acceptedVersion

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

Chemical program; Crop rotation; Herbicide management; Integrated weed management strategy

Publisher

Weed Science Society of America

Related items

Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2016.38

Weed Science, 2017, vol.65, núm. 2, p. 295-304

Rights

(c) Weed Science Society of America, 2017

This item appears in the following Collection(s)