Sublethal effects of neonicotinoid insecticide on calling behavior and pheromone production of tortricid moths

Author

Navarro Roldán, Miguel Ángel

Gemeno Marín, César

Publication date

2017-11-16T11:30:04Z

2018-09-01T22:25:44Z

2017

2017-11-16T11:30:05Z



Abstract

In moths, sexual behavior combines female sex pheromone production and calling behavior. The normal functioning of these periodic events requires an intact nervous system. Neurotoxic insecticide residues in the agroecosystem could impact the normal functioning of pheromone communication through alteration of the nervous system. In this study we assess whether sublethal concentrations of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiacloprid, that competitively modulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the dendrite, affect pheromone production and calling behavior in adults of three economically important tortricid moth pests; Cydia pomonella (L.), Grapholita molesta (Busck), and Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller). Thiacloprid significantly reduced the amount of calling in C. pomonella females at LC0.001 (a lethal concentration that kills only 1 in 105 individuals), and altered its calling period at LC1, and in both cases the effect was dose-dependent. In the other two species the effect was similar but started at higher LCs, and the effect was relatively small in L. botrana. Pheromone production was altered only in C. pomonella, with a reduction of the major compound, codlemone, and one minor component, starting at LC10. Since sex pheromones and neonicotinoids are used together in the management of these three species, our results could have implications regarding the interaction between these two pest control methods. Dades primàries associades a l'article http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/59531


This study was supported by research Grant AGL2013-49164-C2-1 MINECO, Spain.

Document Type

Article
Accepted version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer Verlag

Related items

MINECO/PN2013-2016/AGL2013-49164-C2-1

Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-017-0883-3

Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2017, vol. 43, num. 9, p. 881-890

http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/59531

Rights

(c) Springer Verlag, 2017

This item appears in the following Collection(s)