Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift

dc.contributor.author
Torrent Martí, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Garcerá, Cruz
dc.contributor.author
Moltó García, Enrique
dc.contributor.author
Chueca Adell, Patricia
dc.contributor.author
Abad, Raquel
dc.contributor.author
Grafulla, Carmen
dc.contributor.author
Román, Carla
dc.contributor.author
Planas de Martí, Santiago
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-05T21:50:02Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-05T21:50:02Z
dc.date.issued
2018-11-06T10:52:38Z
dc.date.issued
2019-02-20T23:23:01Z
dc.date.issued
2017
dc.date.issued
2018-11-06T10:52:38Z
dc.identifier
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.001
dc.identifier
0261-2194
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65033
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65033
dc.description.abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate and to compare spray drift potential and field spray drift from pesticide application in citrus orchards carried out mainly comparing standard nozzles with drift reducing nozzles. Two different standard nozzles (hollow cone and full cone) and one Venturi drift reducing nozzle (hollow cone) were tested. Spray drift potential was measured by means of wind tunnel experiments (ISO 22856:2008 method). To estimate field airborne and sedimenting spray drift, two trials with 5 replicates each were carried out (ISO 22866:2005 method) in two different commercial orchards of Clementine mandarins. Results showed that Venturi nozzles significantly reduced drift with the two methodologies. Moreover, the wind tunnel method showed the same trend as the field results. Additionally, spray drift deposition variability was lower for the Venturi nozzles. Therefore, it could be concluded that Venturi nozzles can be recommended to be used in citrus orchards to prevent human and environmental risks and their use could be appropriate for different scenarios where spray drift risk must be mitigated.
dc.description.abstract
Authors would like to thank to Cítrics Terres de l’Ebre, S.A.T. and Manantiales Entrepinos, S.L. for allowing the use of their fields and sprayers. Also, Agrícola la Realense Coop.V. for allowing the use of their fields and Pulverizadores Fede S.A. for the use of equipments. Besides, Universitat de Lleida is also thanked for Mr. X. Torrent's pre-doctoral fellowship.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.001
dc.relation
Crop Protection, 2017, vol. 96, p. 130-143
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Drift potential reduction
dc.subject
Airblast sprayer
dc.subject
Venturi nozzle
dc.subject
Airborne drift
dc.subject
Sedimenting drift
dc.title
Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion


Fitxers en aquest element

FitxersGrandàriaFormatVisualització

No hi ha fitxers associats a aquest element.

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)