dc.contributor.author
Costa-Mateu, Joan
dc.contributor.author
Fernández Rodríguez, Diego
dc.contributor.author
Rivera, Kristian
dc.contributor.author
Casanova, Juan
dc.contributor.author
Irigaray, Patricia
dc.contributor.author
Zielonka, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Pereyra-Acha, Eduardo
dc.contributor.author
Aldomá, Albina
dc.contributor.author
Worner, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-05T22:04:49Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-05T22:04:49Z
dc.date.issued
2020-03-25T10:27:53Z
dc.date.issued
2020-03-25T10:27:53Z
dc.identifier
https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20190232
dc.identifier
1678-4170 (Online)
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/68333
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/68333
dc.description.abstract
Background: Coronary angiography with two catheters is the traditional strategy for diagnostic coronary procedures. TIG I catheter permits to cannulate both coronary arteries, avoiding exchanging catheters during coronary angiography by transradial access. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of one-catheter strategy, by avoiding catheter exchange, on coronary catheterization performance and economic costs. Methods: Transradial coronary diagnostic procedures conducted from January 2013 to June 2017 were collected. One-catheter strategy (TIG I catheter) and two-catheter strategy (left and right Judkins catheters) were compared. The volume of iodinated contrast administered was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included radial spasm, procedural duration (fluoroscopy time) and exposure to ionizing radiation (dose-area product and air kerma). Direct economic costs were also evaluated. For statistical analyses, two-tailed p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: From a total of 1,953 procedures in 1,829 patients, 252 procedures were assigned to one-catheter strategy and 1,701 procedures to two-catheter strategy. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. One-catheter strategy required less iodinated contrast [primary endpoint; (60-105)-mL vs. 92 (64-120)-mL; p < 0.001] than the two-catheter strategy. Also, the one-catheter group presented less radial spasm (5.2% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.022) and shorter fluoroscopy time [3.9 (2.2-8.0)-min vs. 4.8 (2.9-8.3)-min, p = 0.001] and saved costs [149 (140-160)-€/procedure vs. 171 (160-183)-€/procedure; p < 0.001]. No differences in dose-area product and air kerma were detected between the groups. Conclusions: One-catheter strategy, with TIG I catheter, improves coronary catheterization performance and reduces economic costs compared to traditional two-catheter strategy in patients referred for coronary angiography.
dc.publisher
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20190232
dc.relation
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 2019, vol. 113, núm. 5, p. 960-968
dc.rights
cc-by, (c) Costa-Mateu et al., 2019
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Cineagiography/methods
dc.subject
Cardiac Catheterization/economic
dc.subject
Radiation, Ionizing
dc.subject
Cost Savings/economic
dc.title
Impact of One-Catheter Strategy with TIG I Catheter on Coronary Catheterization Performance and Economic Costs
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion