Experimental evidence for sustained carbon sequestration in fire-managed, peat moorlands

Author

Marrs, Rob H.

Marsland, E.-L.

Lingard, R.

Appleby, P. G.

Piliposyan, G. T.

Rose, R. J.

O’Reilly, J.

Milligan, G.

Allen, Katherine A.

Alday, Josu G.

Santana, Victor M.

Lee, HyoHyeMi

Halsall, K.

Chiverrell, R. C.

Publication date

2020-05-04T14:44:53Z

2020-05-04T14:44:53Z

2018-12-03



Abstract

Peat moorlands are important habitats in the boreal region, where they store approximately 30% of the global soil carbon (C). Prescribed burning on peat is a very contentious management strategy, widely linked with loss of carbon. Here, we quantify the effects of prescribed burning for lightly managed boreal moorlands and show that the impacts on peat and C accumulation rates are not as bad as is widely thought. We used stratigraphical techniques within a unique replicated ecological experiment with known burn frequencies to quantify peat and C accumulation rates (0, 1, 3 and 6 managed burns since around 1923). Accumulation rates were typical of moorlands elsewhere, and were reduced significantly only in the 6-burn treatment. However, impacts intensified gradually with burn frequency; each additional burn reduced the accumulation rates by 4.9 g m−2 yr−1 (peat) and 1.9 g C cm−2 yr−1, but did not prevent accumulation. Species diversity and the abundance of peat-forming species also increased with burn frequency. Our data challenge widely held perceptions that a move to 0 burning is essential for peat growth, and show that appropriate prescribed burning can both mitigate wildfire risk in a warmer world and produce relatively fast peat growth and sustained C sequestration.


This work was funded by the Heather Trust and NERC/DEFRA (FIREMAN BioDiversa project (NE/G002096/1).

Document Type

Article
Accepted version

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

Biodiversity; Biogeochemistry; Boreal ecology; Climate-change ecology; Ecology

Publisher

Springer Nature

Related items

Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0266-6

Nature Geoscience, 2019, vol. 12, p. 108-112

Rights

(c) Springer Nature, 2018

This item appears in the following Collection(s)