Reassessing global change research priorities in mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems: how far have we come and where do we go from here?

Author

Doblas Miranda, Enrique

Martínez-Vilalta, Jordi

Lloret, Francisco

Álvarez Nebot, Albert

Àvila i Castells, Anna

Bonet García, Francisco Javier

Brotons, Lluís

Castro, J.

Curiel Yuste, Jorge

Díaz, M.

Ferrandis, Pablo

García-Hurtado, E.

Iriondo, J.M.

Keenan, T. F.

Latron, J.

Llusià Benet, Joan

Loepfe, L.

Mayol, Maria

Moré, Gerard

Moya, D.

Peñuelas, Josep

Pons, Xavier

Poyatos, Rafael

Sardans i Galobart, Jordi

Sus, Oliver

Vallejo Calzada, V. R.

Vayreda, Jordi

Retana, Javier

Publication date

2020-06-18T09:19:08Z

2020-06-18T09:19:08Z

2014-09-30



Abstract

Aim: Mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems serve as reference laboratories for the investigation of global change because of their transitional climate, the high spatiotemporal variability of their environmental conditions, a rich and unique biodiversity and a wide range of socio‐economic conditions. As scientific development and environmental pressures increase, it is increasingly necessary to evaluate recent progress and to challenge research priorities in the face of global change. Location: Mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems. Methods: This article revisits the research priorities proposed in a 1998 assessment. Results: A new set of research priorities is proposed: (1) to establish the role of the landscape mosaic on fire‐spread; (2) to further research the combined effect of different drivers on pest expansion; (3) to address the interaction between drivers of global change and recent forest management practices; (4) to obtain more realistic information on the impacts of global change and ecosystem services; (5) to assess forest mortality events associated with climatic extremes; (6) to focus global change research on identifying and managing vulnerable areas; (7) to use the functional traits concept to study resilience after disturbance; (8) to study the relationship between genotypic and phenotypic diversity as a source of forest resilience; (9) to understand the balance between C storage and water resources; (10) to analyse the interplay between landscape‐scale processes and biodiversity conservation; (11) to refine models by including interactions between drivers and socio‐economic contexts; (12) to understand forest–atmosphere feedbacks; (13) to represent key mechanisms linking plant hydraulics with landscape hydrology. Main conclusions: (1) The interactive nature of different global change drivers remains poorly understood. (2) There is a critical need for the rapid development of regional‐ and global‐scale models that are more tightly connected with large‐scale experiments, data networks and management practice. (3) More attention should be directed to drought‐related forest decline and the current relevance of historical land use.


The present review is an outcome of the research project MONTES‐Consolider (CSD2008‐00040), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, which also partially supported L.L. through the grant Complexity‐NET RESINEE. X.P. is the recipient of an ICREA Acadèmia Excellence in Research grant (2011–2015).

Document Type

Article
Accepted version

Language

English

Subjects and keywords

Assessment; Atmosphere–biosphere interaction; Biodiversity; Climate change; Fire regime; Forest management; Factors interaction; Land‐use change; Research gaps; Water reserves

Publisher

Wiley

Related items

Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12224

Global ecology and biogeography, 2015, vol. 24, núm. 1, p. 25-43

Rights

(c) John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2014

This item appears in the following Collection(s)