dc.contributor.author
Veres, Andrea
dc.contributor.author
Wyckhuys, Kris A. G.
dc.contributor.author
Kiss, Jozsef
dc.contributor.author
Tóth, Ferenc
dc.contributor.author
Burgio, Giovanni
dc.contributor.author
Pons i Domènech, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Avilla, Carlos
dc.contributor.author
Vidal, Stefan
dc.contributor.author
Razinger, Jaka
dc.contributor.author
Bazok, Renata
dc.contributor.author
Matyjaszczyk, Ewa
dc.contributor.author
Milosavljević, Ivan
dc.contributor.author
Vi Le, Xuan
dc.contributor.author
Zhou, Wenwu
dc.contributor.author
Zhu, Zeng-Rong
dc.contributor.author
Tarno, Hagus
dc.contributor.author
Hadi, Buyung
dc.contributor.author
Lundgren, Jonathan
dc.contributor.author
Bonmatin, Jean-Marc
dc.contributor.author
Bijleveld van Lexmond, Maarten
dc.contributor.author
Aebi, Alexandre
dc.contributor.author
Rauf, Aunu
dc.contributor.author
Furlan, Lorenzo
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-05T22:41:58Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-05T22:41:58Z
dc.date.issued
2020-11-09T09:57:59Z
dc.date.issued
2020-11-09T09:57:59Z
dc.date.issued
2020-06-04
dc.identifier
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09279-x
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/69809
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/69809
dc.description.abstract
We present a synthetic review and expert consultation that assesses the actual risks posed by arthropod pests in four major crops, identifies targets for integrated pest management (IPM) in terms of cultivated land needing pest control and gauges the implementation “readiness” of non-chemical alternatives. Our assessment focuses on the world’s primary target pests for neonicotinoid-based management: western corn rootworm (WCR, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) in maize; wireworms (Agriotes spp.) in maize and winter wheat; bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) in winter wheat; brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens) in rice; cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii) and silver-leaf whitefly (SLW, Bemisia tabaci) in cotton. First, we queried scientific literature databases and consulted experts from different countries in Europe, North America, and Asia about available IPM tools for each crop-pest system. Next, using an online survey, we quantitatively assessed the economic relevance of target pests by compiling country-level records of crop damage, yield impacts, extent of insecticide usage, and “readiness” status of various pest management alternatives (i.e., research, plot-scale validation, grower-uptake). Biological control received considerable scientific attention, while agronomic strategies (e.g., crop rotation), insurance schemes, decision support systems (DSS), and innovative pesticide application modes were listed as key alternatives. Our study identifies opportunities to advance applied research, IPM technology validation, and grower education to halt or drastically reduce our over-reliance on systemic insecticides globally.
dc.description.abstract
he authors would like to thank the Stichting Triodos Foundation (The Netherlands) for funding the Task Force on Systemic Pesticides (TFSP) as a totally independent research group, for making this study and the relative open access possible. The Stichting Triodos Foundation received funds from the Umwelt Stiftung Greenpeace (Germany), Pollinis (France) and the M.A.O.C. Gravin van Bylandt Stichting (The Netherlands).
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09279-x
dc.relation
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, vol. 27, p. 29867-29899
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Veres, Andrea et al., 2020
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Neonicotinoids
dc.subject
Brown planthopper
dc.subject
Agricultural policy
dc.subject
Biological control
dc.title
An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic pesticides. Part 4: Alternatives in major cropping systems
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion