Impacts of global change on species distributions: obstacles and solutions to integrate climate and land use

Autor/a

Sirami, Clélia

Caplat, Paul

Popy, Simon

Clamens, Alex

Arlettaz, Raphaël

Jiguet, Frédéric

Brotons, Lluís

Martin, Jean-Louis

Fecha de publicación

2020-11-19T08:57:32Z

2020-11-19T08:57:32Z

2016-12-27



Resumen

Aim: The impact of multiple stressors on biodiversity is one of the most pressing questions in ecology and biodiversity conservation. Here we critically assess how often and efficiently two main drivers of global change have been simultaneously integrated into research, with the aim of providing practical solutions for better integration in the future. We focus on the integration of climate change (CC) and land‐use change (LUC) when studying changes in species distributions. Location: Global. Methods: We analysed the peer‐reviewed literature on the effects of CC and LUC on observed changes in species distributions, i.e. including species range and abundance, between 2000 and 2014. Results: Studies integrating CC and LUC remain extremely scarce, which hampers our ability to develop appropriate conservation strategies. The lack of CC–LUC integration is likely to be a result of insufficient recognition of the co‐occurrence of CC and LUC at all scales, covariation and interactions between CC and LUC, as well as correlations between species thermal and habitat requirements. Practical guidelines for the study of these interactive effects include considering multiple drivers and processes when designing studies, using available long‐term datasets on multiple drivers, revisiting single‐driver studies with additional drivers or conducting comparative studies and meta‐analyses. Combining various methodological approaches, including time lags and adaptation processes, represent further avenues to improve global change science. Main conclusions: Despite repeated claims for a better integration of multiple drivers, the effects of CC and LUC on species distributions and abundances have been mostly studied in isolation, which calls for a shift of standards towards more integrative global change science. The guidelines proposed here will encourage study designs that account for multiple drivers and improve our understanding of synergies or antagonisms among drivers.

Tipo de documento

Artículo
Versión aceptada

Lengua

Inglés

Materias y palabras clave

Antagonisms; Climate change; Community indices; Land‐use change; Range shift; Synergies

Publicado por

John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Documentos relacionados

Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12555

Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2017, vol. 26, núm. 4, p. 385-394

Derechos

(c) John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2016

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)