Leaf versus whole-canopy remote sensing methodologies for crop monitoring under conservation agriculture: a case of study with maize in Zimbabwe

dc.contributor.author
Gracia-Romero, Adrian
dc.contributor.author
Kefauver, Shawn C.
dc.contributor.author
Vergara-Diaz, Omar
dc.contributor.author
Hamadziripi, Esnath
dc.contributor.author
Zaman‑Allah, Mainassara A.
dc.contributor.author
Thierfelder, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Prassana, Boddupalli M.
dc.contributor.author
Cairns, Jill E.
dc.contributor.author
Araus Ortega, José Luis
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-05T22:01:28Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-05T22:01:28Z
dc.date.issued
2020-12-03T10:30:47Z
dc.date.issued
2020-12-03T10:30:47Z
dc.date.issued
2020-09-29
dc.identifier
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73110-3
dc.identifier
2045-2322
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/70008
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/70008
dc.description.abstract
Enhancing nitrogen fertilization efficiency for improving yield is a major challenge for smallholder farming systems. Rapid and cost-effective methodologies with the capability to assess the effects of fertilization are required to facilitate smallholder farm management. This study compares maize leaf and canopy-based approaches for assessing N fertilization performance under different tillage, residue coverage and top-dressing conditions in Zimbabwe. Among the measurements made on individual leaves, chlorophyll readings were the best indicators for both N content in leaves (R < 0.700) and grain yield (GY) (R < 0.800). Canopy indices reported even higher correlation coefficients when assessing GY, especially those based on the measurements of the vegetation density as the green area indices (R < 0.850). Canopy measurements from both ground and aerial platforms performed very similar, but indices assessed from the UAV performed best in capturing the most relevant information from the whole plot and correlations with GY and leaf N content were slightly higher. Leaf-based measurements demonstrated utility in monitoring N leaf content, though canopy measurements outperformed the leaf readings in assessing GY parameters, while providing the additional value derived from the affordability and easiness of using a pheno-pole system or the high-throughput capacities of the UAVs.
dc.description.abstract
This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and USAID funded project Stress Tolerant Maize for Africa (STMA) (grant number OPP1134248) and the CGIAR Research Program on Maize (MAIZE). The CGIAR Research Program MAIZE receives W1&W2 support from the Governments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, U.K., U.S., and the World Bank. A.G.-R. is a recipient of a FPI doctoral fellowship from the AGL2016-76527-R Project from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish Government. We also acknowledge the support from the Institut de Recerca de l’Aigua and the Universitat de Barcelona. J.L.A. acknowledges the funding support from ICREA, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain.
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Nature Research
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//AGL2016-76527-R/ES/
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73110-3
dc.relation
Scientific Reports, 2020, vol. 10, article number 16008
dc.rights
cc-by, (c) Gracia-Romero, Adrian et al., 2020
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Agroecology
dc.subject
Imaging and sensing
dc.subject
Plant physiology
dc.subject
Plant stress responses
dc.title
Leaf versus whole-canopy remote sensing methodologies for crop monitoring under conservation agriculture: a case of study with maize in Zimbabwe
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)