Embodied energy and embodied carbon of structural building materials: Worldwide progress and barriers through literature map analysis

dc.contributor.author
Cabeza, Luisa F.
dc.contributor.author
Boquera, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Chàfer, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Vérez, David
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-05T22:28:05Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-05T22:28:05Z
dc.date.issued
2021-01-11T10:25:31Z
dc.date.issued
2022-11-07T23:07:59Z
dc.date.issued
2021
dc.date.issued
2021-01-11T10:25:31Z
dc.identifier
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110612
dc.identifier
0378-7788
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/70168
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/70168
dc.description.abstract
Climate change mitigation is a recurrent consciousness topic among society and policymakers. Actions are being adopted to face this crucial environmental challenge, with a rising concern with a big impact on the building sector. Construction materials have a high carbon footprint as well as an energy- intensive activity. To measure the environmental damage and effects, life cycle assessment (LCA) is the methodology most widespread. However, the LCA methodology itself and the assumptions done to carry it out leads to a generalized burden to compare the case studies outcomes. LCA method and for instance geographical location are incompatibilities also revealed in embodied energy and embodied carbon assessments. Urgent actions are needed to clarify the confusions arisen in the research, considering a detailed study on the embodied energy and embodied carbon values. From a material level point of view, this paper aims to illustrate the chronological overview of embodied energy and embodied carbon through keywords analysis. Moreover, to support and corroborate the analysis, an organized summary of the literature data is presented, reporting the range of embodied energy and embodied carbon values up to now. This systematic analysis evidences the lack of standardization and disagreement regarding the assessment of coefficients, database source, and boundary system used in the methodology assessment.
dc.description.abstract
This work was partially funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades de España (RTI2018-093849-B-C31 - MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) and by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades - Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) (RED2018-102431-T). The authors would like to thank the Catalan Government for the quality accreditation given to their research group GREiA (2017 SGR 1537). GREiA is a certified agent TECNIO in the category of technology developers from the Government of Catalonia. This work is partially supported by ICREA under the ICREA Academia programme.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-093849-B-C31/ES/METODOLOGIA PARA EL ANALISIS DE TECNOLOGIAS DE ALMACENAMIENTO DE ENERGIA TERMICA HACIA UNA ECONOMIA CIRCULAR/
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICIU//RED2018-102431-T/ES/RED ESPAÑOLA EN ALMACENAMIENTO DE ENERGIA TERMICA/
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110612
dc.relation
Energy and Buildings, 2021, vol. 231, p. 110612-1-110612-26
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier Science, 2021
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Climate change mitigation
dc.subject
Embodied energy
dc.subject
Embodied carbon
dc.subject
Range of values
dc.subject
Structural building materials
dc.subject
Literature map
dc.subject
Bibliometric analysis
dc.title
Embodied energy and embodied carbon of structural building materials: Worldwide progress and barriers through literature map analysis
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)