Clinical Concepts for Triple Therapy Use in Patients with COPD: A Delphi Consensus

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Miravitlles M] Servei de Pneumologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain. [Acharya S, Aggarwal B] Emerging Markets, GlaxoSmithKline, Singapore. [Fernandes FLA] Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. [Dreyse J] Internal Medicine and Critical Care Center Departments, Clínica Las Condes and School of Medicine, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago, Chile. [Jardim JR] Respiratory Division, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-09-19T08:59:55Z

2023-09-19T08:59:55Z

2023-08-28



Abstract

COPD exacerbations; Delphi procedure; Triple inhaled therapy


Exacerbacions de MPOC; Procediment Delphi; Teràpia triple inhalada


Exacerbaciones de la EPOC; Procedimiento Delphi; Terapia triple inhalada


Purpose: Role of triple therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management is supported by growing evidence, but consensus is lacking on various aspects. We conducted a Delphi survey in respiratory experts on the effects of triple therapy on exacerbation reduction, early optimization, pneumonia risk, and mortality benefits in COPD management. Methods: The study comprised 2-round online surveys and a participant meeting with 21 respiratory experts from 10 countries. The 31-statement questionnaire was prepared using Decipher software after literature review. Responses were recorded using Likert scale ranging from 1 (disagreement) to 9 (agreement) with a consensus threshold of 75%. Results: All experts participated in both surveys and 14/21 attended participant meeting. Consensus was reached on 13/31 questions in first survey and 4/14 in second survey on: mortality benefits of triple therapy; comparable pneumonia risk between single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) and multiple inhaler triple therapy (81%); preference of SITT for patients with high eosinophil count (95%); exacerbation risk reduction and healthcare cost benefits with early initiation of SITT post exacerbation-related hospitalization (< 30 days) (86%). No consensus was reached on first line SITT use after first exacerbation resulting in COPD diagnosis (62%). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there is consensus among experts regarding many of the key concepts about appropriate clinical use and benefits of triple therapy in COPD. More evidence is required for evaluating the benefits of early optimisation of triple therapy.


This study was funded by GSK. Meetings, data analysis, and medical writing assistance were funded by GSK.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Dove Medical Press

Related items

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease;18

https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S424128

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)