Association of intravenous thrombolysis and pre-interventional reperfusion: a post hoc analysis of the SWIFT DIRECT trial

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Mujanovic A] University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. [Eker O] Department of Neuroradiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France. [Marnat G] Interventional and Diagnostic Neuroradiology, University Hospital Centre Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. [Strbian D, Ijäs P] Department of Neurology, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. [Préterre C] Stroke Unit, University Hospital Centre Nantes, Nantes, France. [Ribo M] Unitat d’Ictus, Servei de Neurologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-11-23T14:01:36Z

2023-11-23T14:01:36Z

2023-11



Abstract

Stroke; Thrombectomy; Thrombolysis


Ictus; Trombectomia; Trombòlisi


Ictus; Trombectomía; Trombólisis


Background A potential benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is pre-interventional reperfusion. Currently, there are few data on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion in patients randomized to IVT or no IVT before MT. Methods SWIFT DIRECT (Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy Plus Intravenous t-PA vs DIRECT Solitaire Stent-retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke) was a randomized controlled trial including acute ischemic stroke IVT eligible patients being directly admitted to a comprehensive stroke center, with allocation to IVT with MT versus MT alone. The primary endpoint of this analysis was the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion, defined as a pre-interventional expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of ≥2a. The effect of IVT and potential treatment effect heterogeneity were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. Results Of 396 patients, pre-interventional reperfusion occurred in 20 (10.0%) patients randomized to IVT with MT, and in 7 (3.6%) patients randomized to MT alone. Receiving IVT favored the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion (adjusted OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.23 to 6.87). There was no IVT treatment effect heterogeneity on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion with different strata of Randomization-to-Groin-Puncture time (p for interaction=0.33), although the effect tended to be stronger in patients with a Randomization-to-Groin-Puncture time >28 min (adjusted OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 18.68). There were no significant differences in rates of functional outcomes between patients with and without pre-interventional reperfusion. Conclusion Even for patients with proximal large vessel occlusions and direct access to MT, IVT resulted in an absolute increase of 6% in rates of pre-interventional reperfusion. The influence of time strata on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion should be studied further in an individual patient data meta-analysis of comparable trials. Trial registration number clinicaltrials.gov NCT03192332.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

BMJ

Related items

Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery;15(e2)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2022-019585

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)