Institut Català de la Salut
[Sakai Y] Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. [Cao Q, Rubin J] Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. [Witsch J] Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. [Cohen-Addad D] Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. [de Macedo Rodrigues K] Greensboro Radiology, Greensboro, NC, USA. [Juega J] Servei de Neurologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
2024-01-12T08:25:21Z
2024-01-12T08:25:21Z
2023-12-05
Atherosclerosis; Imaging; Stroke
Aterosclerosis; Imágenes; Ictus
Aterosclerosi; Imatges; Ictus
Background Complex aortic plaque (CAP) is a potential embolic source in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS). We review CAP imaging criteria for transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance imaging and calculate CAP prevalence in patients with acute CS. Methods and Results PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to December 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guideline. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study design, imaging techniques, CAP criteria, and prevalence. The Cochrane Collaboration tool and Guideline for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies were used to assess risk of bias and reporting completeness, respectively. From 2293 studies, 45 were reviewed for CAP imaging biomarker criteria in patients with acute CS (N=37 TEE; N=9 CTA; N=6 magnetic resonance imaging). Most studies (74%) used ≥4 mm plaque thickness as the imaging criterion for CAP although ≥1 mm (N=1, CTA), ≥5 mm (N=5, TEE), and ≥6 mm (N=2, CTA) were also reported. Additional features included mobility, ulceration, thrombus, protrusions, and assessment of plaque composition. From 23 prospective studies, CAP was detected in 960 of 2778 patients with CS (0.32 [95% CI, 0.24–0.41], I2=94%). By modality, prevalence estimates were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.20–0.40; I2=95%) for TEE; 0.23 (95% CI, 0.15–0.34; I2=87%) for CTA and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.06–0.54; I2=92%) for magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions TEE was commonly used to assess CAP in patients with CS. The most common CAP imaging biomarker was ≥4 mm plaque thickness. CAP was observed in one‐third of patients with acute CS. However, high study heterogeneity suggests a need for reproducible imaging methods.
The work is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL147355, Z.F.), American Heart Association Career Development Awards (938082 to J.W.S.; 23CDA1053561 to J.W.), Vice Provost for University Research Foundation (J.W.S.), and Institute of Translational Medicine and Therapeutics (J.W.S.).
Article
Published version
English
Placa ateroscleròtica; Imatgeria per al diagnòstic; Malalties cerebrovasculars; DISEASES::Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms::Pathological Conditions, Anatomical::Plaque, Atherosclerotic; DISEASES::Nervous System Diseases::Central Nervous System Diseases::Brain Diseases::Cerebrovascular Disorders::Stroke; ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT::Diagnosis::Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures::Diagnostic Imaging; ENFERMEDADES::afecciones patológicas, signos y síntomas::afecciones patológicas anatómicas::placa aterosclerótica; ENFERMEDADES::enfermedades del sistema nervioso::enfermedades del sistema nervioso central::enfermedades cerebrales::trastornos cerebrovasculares::accidente cerebrovascular; TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS::diagnóstico::técnicas y procedimientos diagnósticos::diagnóstico por imagen
Wiley
Journal of the American Heart Association;12(23)
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.031797
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Articles científics - HVH [3440]