SKYSCRAPER-02: Tiragolumab in Combination With Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Rudin CM] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. [Liu SV] Georgetown University, Washington, DC. [Soo RA] National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore. [Lu S] Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China. [Hong MH] Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. [Lee JS] Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. [Navarro A] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-01-31T13:08:25Z

2024-01-31T13:08:25Z

2024-01-20



Abstract

Tiragolumab; Chemotherapy; Small-cell lung cancer


Tiragolumab; Quimioteràpia; Càncer de pulmó de cèl·lules petites


Tiragolumab; Quimioterapia; Cáncer de pulmón de células pequeñas


Purpose The phase III SKYSCRAPER-02 study determined whether the benefits of atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (CE) could be enhanced by the addition of tiragolumab in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We report final progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. Methods Patients received tiragolumab 600 mg/placebo, plus atezolizumab 1,200 mg and CE (four cycles), then maintenance tiragolumab/placebo plus atezolizumab. Primary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and OS in patients without history/presence of brain metastases (primary analysis set [PAS]). Additional end points included PFS and OS in all patients regardless of brain metastases status (full analysis set [FAS]), response, and safety. Results Four hundred ninety patients were randomly assigned (FAS): 243 to tiragolumab arm and 247 to control arm. At the cutoff date (February 6, 2022; median duration of follow-up, 14.3 months [PAS] and 13.9 months [FAS]), final analysis of PFS in the PAS (n = 397) did not reach statistical significance (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; P = .3504; median, 5.4 months tiragolumab v 5.6 months control). At the cutoff date (September 6, 2022; median duration of follow-up, 21.2 months [FAS]), median OS in the PAS at final OS analysis was 13.1 months in both arms (stratified HR, 1.14; P = .2859). Median PFS and OS in the FAS were consistent with the PAS. The proportion of patients with immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) in the tiragolumab and control arms was 54.4% and 49.2%, respectively (grade 3/4: 7.9% and 7.7%). AEs leading to treatment withdrawal occurred in 8.4% and 9.3% of tiragolumab- and control-treated patients, respectively. Conclusion Tiragolumab did not provide additional benefit over atezolizumab and CE in untreated ES-SCLC. The combination was well tolerated with no new safety signals.


Supported by Genentech Inc and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. C.M.D.'s work on small cell lung cancer is supported by NIH R35CA263816, U24CA13274, and P30CA008748.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology

Related items

Journal of Clinical Oncologyncology;42(3)

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01363

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)