Consensus-based recommendations for diagnosis and surgical management of cranioplasty and post-traumatic hydrocephalus from a European panel

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Iaccarino C] School of Neurosurgery, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. Neurosurgery Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy. Neurosurgery Unit, AUSL RE IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy. [Chibbaro S] Neurosurgery Department, University of Siena, AOUS Le Scotte, Siena, Italy. [Sauvigny T] Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. [Timofeev I] Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. [Zaed I] Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter of the Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland. [Franchetti S] Neurosurgery Unit, AUSL RE IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy. [Poca MA] Centre de Recerca Matemàtica (CRM), Bellaterra, Spain. Servei de Neurocirurgia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Departament de Cirurgia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-03-22T09:16:07Z

2024-03-22T09:16:07Z

2024-01-26



Abstract

Cranioplasty; Post-traumatic hydrocephalus; Surgical strategy


Craneoplastia; Hidrocefalia postraumática; Estrategia quirúrgica


Cranioplàstia; Hidrocefàlia posttraumàtica; Estratègia quirúrgica


Introduction Planning cranioplasty (CPL) in patients with suspected or proven post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) poses a significant management challenge due to a lack of clear guidance. Research question This project aims to create a European document to improve adherence and adapt to local protocols based on available resources and national health systems. Methods After a thorough non-systematic review, a steering committee (SC) formed a European expert panel (EP) for a two-round questionnaire using the Delphi method. The questionnaire employed a 9-point Likert scale to assess the appropriateness of statements inherent to two sections: "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" and "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction." Results The panel reached a consensus on 29 statements. In the "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" section, five statements were deemed "appropriate" (consensus 74.2−90.3 %), two were labeled "inappropriate," and seven were marked as "uncertain." In the "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction" section, four statements were considered "appropriate" (consensus 74.2−90.4 %), six were "inappropriate," and five were "uncertain." Discussion and conclusion Planning a cranioplasty alongside hydrocephalus remains a significant challenge in neurosurgery. Our consensus conference suggests that, in patients with cranial decompression and suspected hydrocephalus, the most suitable diagnostic approach involves a combination of evolving clinical conditions and neuroradiological imaging. The recommended management sequence prioritizes cranial reconstruction, with the option of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt when needed, preferably with a programmable valve. We strongly recommend to adopt local protocols based on expert consensus, such as this, to guide patient care.


This project was conducted with the non-conditioning assistance of Integra LifeSciences.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

Brain and Spine;4

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.102761

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)