Institut Català de la Salut
[Cortes J] Oncology Department, International Breast Cancer Center (BCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quirónsalud, Barcelona, Spain. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. [Winer EP] Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. [Lipatov O] Department of Oncology, Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of the Ministry of Public Health of Bashkortostan Republic, Ufa, Russia. [Im SA] Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. [Gonçalves A] Aix Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France. [Muñoz-Couselo E] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
2024-04-23T07:01:44Z
2024-04-23T07:01:44Z
2024-05
Pembrolizumab; Triple‐negative breast cancer
Pembrolizumab; Cáncer de mama triple negativo
Pembrolizumab; Càncer de mama triple negatiu
The efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy increased with increasing programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as quantified by combined positive score (CPS; PD-L1 expression on both tumour cells and immune cells) in patients with previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-119 study. This exploratory analysis was conducted to determine whether the expression of PD-L1 on tumour cells contributes to the predictive value of PD-L1 CPS in mTNBC. PD-L1 expression in tumour samples was assessed using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and quantified using both CPS and tumour proportion score (TPS; PD-L1 expression on tumour cells alone). Calculated immune cell density (CID) was defined as CPS minus TPS. The ability of each scoring method (CPS, TPS, and CID) to predict clinical outcomes with pembrolizumab was evaluated. With pembrolizumab, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.69 (95% CI = 0.58–0.80) for CPS, 0.55 (95% CI = 0.46–0.64) for TPS, and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56–0.77) for CID. After correction for cutoff prevalence, CPS performed as well as, if not better than, CID with respect to predicting objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Data from this exploratory analysis suggest that, although PD-L1 expression on immune cells alone is predictive of response to programmed death 1 blockade in mTNBC, adding tumour PD-L1 expression assessment (i.e. CPS, which combines immune cell and tumour cell PD-L1 expression) may improve prediction. PD-L1 CPS thus remains an effective and broadly applicable uniform scoring system for enriching response to programmed death 1 blockade with pembrolizumab in mTNBC as well as other tumour types.
Article
Published version
English
Mama - Càncer - Tractament; Mama - Càncer - Aspectes genètics; Marcadors tumorals; Antígens; DISEASES::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Breast Neoplasms::Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/drug therapy; CHEMICALS AND DRUGS::Biological Factors::Biomarkers::Biomarkers, Tumor; CHEMICALS AND DRUGS::Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins::Proteins::Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins::B7 Antigens::B7-H1 Antigen; ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias de la mama::neoplasias de mama triple negativos; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/farmacoterapia; COMPUESTOS QUÍMICOS Y DROGAS::factores biológicos::biomarcadores::marcadores tumorales; COMPUESTOS QUÍMICOS Y DROGAS::aminoácidos, péptidos y proteínas::proteínas::péptidos y proteínas de señalización intercelular::antígenos B7::antígeno B7-H1
Wiley
The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research;10(3)
https://doi.org/10.1002/2056-4538.12371
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Articles científics - HVH [3439]