Effectiveness and tolerability of brivaracetam in patients with epilepsy stratified by comorbidities and etiology in the real world: 12-month subgroup data from the international EXPERIENCE pooled analysis

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Szafarski JP] University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Heersink School of Medicine Department of Neurology and UAB Epilepsy Center, Birmingham, AL, USA. [Besson H] UCB Pharma, Breda, Netherlands. [D’Souza W] Department of Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. [Faught E] Emory Epilepsy Center, Atlanta, GA, USA. [Klein P] Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. [Reuber M] The University of Shefeld, Shefeld, UK. [Salas Puig J] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-06-04T10:58:02Z

2024-06-04T10:58:02Z

2024-06



Abstract

Comorbidity; Effectiveness; Tolerability


Comorbilitat; Eficàcia; Tolerabilitat


Comorbilidad; Eficacia; Tolerabilidad


Objective To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in adults with epilepsy by specific comorbidities and epilepsy etiologies. Methods EXPERIENCE/EPD332 was a pooled analysis of individual patient records from several non-interventional studies of patients with epilepsy initiating BRV in clinical practice. Outcomes included ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency, seizure freedom (no seizures within prior 3 months), continuous seizure freedom (no seizures since baseline), BRV discontinuation, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Analyses were performed for all adult patients (≥ 16 years of age) and stratified by comorbidity and by etiology at baseline (patients with cognitive/learning disability [CLD], psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, brain tumor−related epilepsy [BTRE], and traumatic brain injury−related epilepsy [TBIE]). Results At 12 months, ≥ 50% seizure reduction was achieved in 35.6% (n = 264), 38.7% (n = 310), 41.7% (n = 24), 34.1% (n = 41), and 50.0% (n = 28) of patients with CLD, psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, BTRE, and TBIE, respectively; and continuous seizure freedom was achieved in 5.7% (n = 318), 13.7% (n = 424), 29.4% (n = 34), 11.4% (n = 44), and 13.8% (n = 29), respectively. During the study follow-up, in patients with CLD, psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, BTRE, and TBIE, 37.1% (n = 403), 30.7% (n = 605), 33.3% (n = 51), 39.7% (n = 68), and 27.1% (n = 49) of patients discontinued BRV, respectively; and TEAEs since prior visit at 12 months were reported in 11.3% (n = 283), 10.0% (n = 410), 16.7% (n = 36), 12.5% (n = 48), and 3.0% (n = 33), respectively. Conclusions BRV as prescribed in the real world is effective and well tolerated among patients with CLD, psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, BTRE, and TBIE.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer

Related items

Journal of Neurology;271

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12253-z

This study was funded by UCB Pharma.

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)