Cystic fibrosis: desensitization in delayed hypersensitivity reactions to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Gómez-Ganda L, Fernández-Polo A, García-Palop B, Parramón-Teixidó CJ] Servei de Farmàcia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Galván-Blasco P, Cardona V] Servei d’Al·lergologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. [Polverino E, Álvarez-Fernández A] Unitat de Fibrosi Quística, Pneumologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-07-02T12:13:46Z

2024-07-02T12:13:46Z

2024-06-12



Abstract

Cystic fibrosis; Delayed hypersensitivity; Rash


Fibrosis quística; Hipersensibilidad retardada; Erupción


Fibrosi quística; Hipersensibilitat retardada; Erupció


Background: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators are the only available treatment for cystic fibrosis. Although elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) is well-tolerated, rash has been reported as very frequent. In severe rashes, ELX/TEZ/IVA withdrawal is necessary, leading to clinical deterioration. The objective of the study is to increment the experience of ELX/TEZ/IVA desensitization. Methods: Adult patients who developed a delayed hypersensitivity rash to ELX/TEZ/IVA between December 2021 and February 2023 and required withdrawal due to ineffective rescue medication were included. Skins test for ELX/TEZ/IVA and IVA were conducted to establish hypersensitivity mechanism. Balijepally ELX/TEZ/IVA desensitization protocol was selected. In cases where desensitization had to be discontinued due to rash, an extended desensitization was proposed. Clinical and health-related quality of life parameters were collected before ELX/TEZ/IVA and after desensitization. Results: 162 patients (81 women, 31.2 [23.8–42.5] years) started ELX/TEZ/IVA, developing rash 12 of them (7.4%, six women). Six patients (five women) required stopping ELX/TEZ/IVA and were selected for desensitization. Skin tests indicated delayed type-IV hypersensitivity in one patient. Two patients presented adequate tolerance to desensitization; while, four patients developed rash. Three of these patients, successfully concluded extended desensitization (one patient declined participation). No significant clinical deterioration or quality of life worsening was observed during desensitization; in fact, there was an improvement in practically all mesured parameters. All five patients who resumed ELX/TEZ/IVA are currently receiving therapy with good tolerance. Conclusion: Desensitization to ELX/TEZ/IVA could be a successful and safe strategy for reintroducing this essential treatment in cases of a delayed hypersensitivity rash.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Frontiers Media

Related items

Frontiers in Pharmacology;15

https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1392986

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)