Impact of prior treatment on selinexor, bortezomib, dexamethasone outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended follow-up subgroup analysis of the BOSTON trial

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Mateos MV] Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. [Engelhardt M] Interdisciplinary Cancer Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. [Leleu X] University of Potiers and CHU, Poitiers, France. [Gironella Mesa M] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Cavo M] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Seràgnoli Institute of Haematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy. [Dimopoulos M] National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-07-09T10:09:03Z

2024-07-09T10:09:03Z

2024-08



Abstract

Bortezomib; Multiple myeloma; Proteasome inhibitor


Bortezomib; Mieloma múltiple; Inhibidor del proteasoma


Bortezomib; Mieloma múltiple; Inhibidor del proteasoma


Objectives To analyze the impact of prior therapies on outcomes with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (SVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in 402 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the phase 3 BOSTON trial. Methods Post hoc analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor (PI)-naïve, bortezomib-naïve, and one prior line of therapy (1LOT) patient subgroups. Results At a median follow-up of over 28 months, clinically meaningful improvements in PFS were noted across all groups with SVd. The median SVd PFS was longer in all subgroups (lenalidomide-refractory: 10.2 vs. 7.1 months, PI-naïve: 29.5 vs. 9.7; bortezomib-naïve: 29.5 vs. 9.7; 1LOT: 21.0 vs. 10.7; p < .05). The lenalidomide-refractory subgroup had longer OS with SVd (26.7 vs. 18.6 months; HR 0.53; p = .015). In all subgroups, overall response and ≥very good partial response rates were higher with SVd. The manageable safety profile of SVd was similar to the overall patient population. Conclusions With over 2 years of follow-up, these clinically meaningful outcomes further support the use of SVd in patients who are lenalidomide-refractory, PI-naïve, bortezomib-naïve, or who received 1LOT (including a monoclonal antibody) and underscore the observed synergy between selinexor and bortezomib.


The BOSTON trial was sponsored by Karyopharm Therapeutics. This subgroup analysis was supported by the Menarini Group.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Wiley

Related items

European Journal of Haematology;113(2)

https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14223

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)