Glyoxal acid-free (GAF) histological fixative is a suitable alternative to formalin: results from an open-label comparative non-inferiority study

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Ryska A] The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University and Faculty Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. [Sapino A] Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy. Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. [Landolfi S, Sansano Valero I, Ramon y Cajal S] Servei d’Anatomia Patològica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Oliveira P] Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-10-01T10:15:18Z

2024-10-01T10:15:18Z

2023

2024-08



Abstract

Fixation; Formalin; Glyoxal acid-free


Fijación; Formalina; Libre de ácido glioxal


Fixació; Formalina; Lliure d'àcid glioxal


Formalin, an aqueous solution of formaldehyde, has been the gold standard for fixation of histological samples for over a century. Despite its considerable advantages, growing evidence points to objective toxicity, particularly highlighting its carcinogenicity and mutagenic effects. In 2016, the European Union proposed a ban, but a temporary permission was granted in consideration of its fundamental role in the medical-diagnostic field. In the present study, we tested an innovative fixative, glyoxal acid-free (GAF) (a glyoxal solution deprived of acids), which allows optimal tissue fixation at structural and molecular level combined with the absence of toxicity and carcinogenic activity. An open-label, non-inferiority, multicentric trial was performed comparing fixation of histological specimens with GAF fixative vs standard phosphate-buffered formalin (PBF), evaluating the morphological preservation and the diagnostic value with four binary score questions answered by both the central pathology reviewer and local center reviewers. The mean of total score in the GAF vs PBF fixative groups was 3.7 ± 0.5 vs 3.9 ± 0.3 for the central reviewer and 3.8 ± 0.5 vs 4.0 ± 0.1 for the local pathologist reviewers, respectively. In terms of median value, similar results were observed between the two fixative groups, with a median value of 4.0. Data collected indicate the non-inferiority of GAF as compared to PBF for all organs tested. The present clinical performance study, performed following the international standard for performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices, highlights the capability of GAF to ensure both structural preservation and diagnostic value of the preparations.


Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Torino within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. The study was supported by Piedmont Region, European Funds for Regional Development (POR FESR 2014–2020) trough Addax Biosciences.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer

Related items

Virchows Archiv;485

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03692-6

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)