High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: PETHEMA-GEM experience

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[González‐Calle V] Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC‐USAL, CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain. [Rodriguez‐Otero P, Calasanz MJ] Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicadas (Cima); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain. [Guijarro M, Martínez‐López J] Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, I + 12, CNIO, Complutense University, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain. [Rosiñol L] Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. [Gironella M] Servei d’Hematologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-01-29T07:42:09Z

2025-01-29T07:42:09Z

2024-12-10



Abstract

Cytogenetic abnormalities; Multiple myeloma


Anomalías citogenéticas; Mieloma múltiple


Anomalies citogenètiques; Mieloma múltiple


This study examines the impact of cytogenetic abnormalities and their co-segregation on the prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. The analysis included 1304 patients from four different GEM-PETHEMA clinical trials. Genetic alterations, such as t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p), +1q, and del(1p), were investigated using FISH on CD38 purified plasma cells. The frequency of genetic alterations detected were as follows: del(17p) in 8%, t(4;14) in 12%, t(14;16) in 3%, +1q in 43%, and del(1p) in 8%. The median follow-up was 61 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 44 months and not reached, respectively. Consistent with previous reports, the presence of t(4;14) was associated with shorter PFS and OS. In our series, the presence of t(14;16) did not impact survival, maybe due to limitations in sample size. Del(17p) was linked to poor prognosis using a cut-off level of ≥20% positive cells, without any impact of higher cut-off in prognosis, except for patients with clonal fraction ≥80% who had a dismal outcome. Cosegregation of cytogenetic abnormalities patients worsened the prognosis in t(4;14) patients but not in patients with del(17p), which retained its adverse prognosis even as a solitary abnormality. Gain(1q) was associated with significantly shorter PFS and OS, while del(1p) affected PFS but not OS. Nevertheless, when co-segregation was eliminated, the detrimental effect of +1q or del(1p) was no longer observed. In conclusion, this study confirms the prognostic significance of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in MM and highlights the importance of considering co-occurrence for accurate prognosis assessment.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Wiley

Related items

HemaSphere;8(12)

https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70031

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)