Value contribution of leniolisib in the Treatment of Activated PI3Kδ syndrome (APDS) in Spain using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Reyes Abad M] Pharmacy Department, H.U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain. [Alerany C] Servei de Farmàcia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [González LI] Immunodeficiencies Unit H.U. 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. [Neth O] Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Rheumatology and Immunology Unit H.U. Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain. [Payares-Herrera C] Clinical Pharmacology Department H.U. Puerta del Hierro, Majadahonda (Madrid) –Spain. [Rodríguez-Gallego C] Department of Immunology, University Hospital of Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. Department of Clinical Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa Canarias, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-04-25T10:12:32Z

2025-04-25T10:12:32Z

2025



Abstract

Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome; Decision-making; Ultra-rare disease


Síndrome de fosfoinositida 3-quinasa delta activada; Toma de decisiones; Enfermedad ultra rara


Síndrome de fosfoinosítida 3-quinasa delta activada; Presa de decisions; Malaltia ultra rara


Background: Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) δ Syndrome (APDS) is an ultra-rare, potentially life-threatening disease that lacks approved treatments in Spain. This study aimed to apply Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to assess the value of the first pharmacological treatment for APDS in Spain. Methods: A multidisciplinary group of 8 experts evaluated the selective PI3Kδ inhibitor leniolisib against Standard of Care (SoC). An MCDA framework tailored for Orphan Drugs (ODs), consisting of 5 comparative and 2 quantitative non-comparative criteria, was used. Re-scoring followed a group discussion. Results: Leniolisib scored higher than SoC in all criteria, including efficacy and safety. It was deemed highly valuable as the first disease-modifying treatment, with a positive therapeutic impact and potential to improve patients’ quality of life. Additionally, leniolisib may lead to cost savings. The supporting data was considered of high quality. Conclusion: Based on MCDA methodology and stakeholder experience in APDS management, leniolisib is seen as a value-added treatment option compared to SoC in Spain.


This study was sponsored by Pharming Technologies B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

AboutScienceSrl

Related items

Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment;12(1)

https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2025.3199

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)