PULSE survey: Population Survey on Knowledge, Gaps and Perception of Heart Rhythm disorders-an initiative of the Scientific Initiatives Committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Gunawardene MA, Sultan A] Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany. [Pürerfellne H] Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Department of Cardiology, Linz, Austria. [Merino JL] Arrhythmia and Robotic Electrophysiology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. [Linz D] Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Scherr D] Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. [Adelino R] Unitat d’Arrítmies, Servei de Cardiologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-05-08T09:57:08Z

2025-05-08T09:57:08Z

2025-04



Abstract

Atrial fibrillation; Cardiac arrhythmias; Cardiac resuscitation


Fibril·lació auricular; Arrítmies cardíaques; Reanimació cardíaca


Fibrilación auricular; Arritmias cardíacas; Reanimación cardíaca


Aims Despite increasing prevalence, the general population lacks knowledge regarding diagnosis, implications, and management of cardiac arrhythmias (CA). This study aims to assess public perception of CA and identify knowledge gaps. Methods and results The 36-item PULSE survey was disseminated via social media to the general population and conducted under the auspices of the European Heart Rhythm Association Scientific Initiatives Committee (EHRA SIC) with EHRA patient committee support. Among 3924 participants (2177 healthy, 1747 with previously diagnosed CA; 59% female, 90% European), 81% reported fear of CA. Females were more likely to be ‘very’ or ‘moderately afraid’ than males [odds ratio (OR) 1.159 (1.005, 1.337), P = 0.046]. While most recognized complications of CA—heart failure (82%), stroke (80%), and death (75%)—43% were unaware that CA can be asymptomatic. Those with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in the past 5 years were 2.6 times and 4.7 times more confident identifying sudden cardiac death and initiating CPR (P < 0.001). Confidence was lower in retired participants [OR 0.574 (0.499, 0.660), P < 0.001] and Southern Europeans [OR 0.703 (0.600, 0.824), P < 0.001]. Without CPR training, only 15% felt confident initiating CPR. Among CA participants, 28% reported severe to disabling daily symptoms. Males were more often asymptomatic (20% vs. 9%, P < 0.001). Treatment rates were comparable between sex categories (81% vs. 79%, P = 0.413). Interdisciplinary shared decision-making processes were reported by 4%. Notably, 1 in 10 CA cases was self-diagnosed using a wearable device, and 30% of CA participants used smartwatches for self-monitoring. Conclusion Significant knowledge gaps regarding CA exist in the general population. Targeted educational initiatives could be a viable tool to enhance public knowledge, confidence in detecting and managing arrhythmias, particularly for women, who experience greater fear and symptom severity despite similar treatment rates.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Related items

EP Europace;27(4)

https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf032

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)