Reshaping treatment paradigm in actinic keratosis by using a modified Delphi questionnaire

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Dirschka T] CentroDerm Clinic, Wuppertal, Germany. [Ardigò M] Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy. [Fargnoli MC] San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy. [Ferrándiz-Pulido C] Servei de Dermatologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Gilaberte Y] Department of Dermatology Miguel Servet University Hospital, University of Zaragoza, IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain. [Hadshiew I] MVZ Derma Köln, Cologne, Germany

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-05-26T13:14:25Z

2025-05-26T13:14:25Z

2025



Abstract

Actinic keratoses; Lesion-directed treatment; Modified Delphi consensus


Queratosis actínica; Tratamiento dirigido a la lesión; Consenso Delphi modificado


Queratosis actínica; Tractament dirigit a la lesió; Consens Delphi modificat


Purpose Actinic keratosis (AK) is the main precursor of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Since it is impossible to predict which lesions will progress to cSCC, early treatment of AK is crucial. Although AK treatments are effective, some are associated with local skin reactions that may impact treatment compliance and effectiveness. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to review the efficacy and safety of the different AK treatments, gain an understanding of the dermatologists’ perspectives on their use, and provide guidelines for clinical practice. Materials and methods This document corresponds to a modified Delphi consensus survey, based on a literature review and a single round of questionnaire. Results The Delphi questionnaire was completed by 73 dermatologists from Germany, Italy, and Spain. Agreement was achieved for 78% of statements, while 11% showed discrepancies or were rejected. Conclusions Key findings emphasize the importance of patient-centered approaches and treatment attributes beyond efficacy (e.g. tolerability or adherence). Understanding the mechanisms of action of treatments is vital for managing patients’ and clinicians’ expectations and optimizing outcomes. Alternative strategies for evaluating efficacy, including the Actinic Keratosis Area and Severity Index (AKASI) score and lesion reduction from baseline, were also highlighted.


This work was supported by Almirall.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Related items

https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2487657

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)