Phase III Trial of Pirtobrutinib Versus Idelalisib/Rituximab or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Pretreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (BRUIN CLL-321)

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Sharman JP] Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, US Oncology Research, Eugene, OR. [Munir T] Department of Haematology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom. [Grosicki S] Department of Cancer Prevention, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. [Roeker LE] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center NY, New York, NY. [Burke JM] Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO. [Chen CI] Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. [Bosch F] Servei d’Hematologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-09-23T10:42:14Z

2025-09-23T10:42:14Z

2025-08-01



Abstract

Pirtobrutinib; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Covalent bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor


Pirtobrutinib; Leucemia linfocítica crónica; Inhibidores covalentes de la tirosina quinasa de Bruton


Pirtobrutinib; Leucèmia limfocítica crònica; Inhibidors covalents de la tirosina quinasa de Bruton


Purpose Pirtobrutinib, a noncovalent, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown clinical efficacy and a favorable safety profile. BRUIN CLL-321 was an open-label, randomized phase III study conducted exclusively in patients with R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) previously treated with cBTKi, and compared pirtobrutinib with investigator's choice (IC) of idelalisib/rituximab (IdelaR) or bendamustine/rituximab (BR). Methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pirtobrutinib (200 mg once daily) or IC of IdelaR or BR, and were stratified by previous use of venetoclax and del(17p). The primary end point was independent review committee–assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included time to next treatment or death (TTNT), overall survival (OS), and safety. The primary PFS end point was met at the time of the primary analysis (August 29, 2023), and updated results are reported from the final OS analysis (August 29, 2024). Results A total of 238 patients were randomly assigned to receive pirtobrutinib (n = 119) or IC (n = 119; IdelaR [n = 82], BR [n = 37]). The PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.54 ([95% CI, 0.39 to 0.75]; P = .0002), with a median PFS of 14 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 16.6) in the pirtobrutinib group and 8.7 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 10.4) with IC. The unadjusted OS HR was 1.09 ([95% CI, 0.68 to 1.75]; P = .7202), and 18-month OS rate was 73.4% (95% CI, 63.9 to 80.7) in the pirtobrutinib group and 70.8% (95% CI, 60.9 to 78.7) with IC. Median TTNT was 24 months (95% CI, 17.8 to 29.7) with pirtobrutinib versus 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 12.5) with IC (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.52]). At a median follow-up of 17.2 months, grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were lower with pirtobrutinib (57.7%) than IC (73.4%). Treatment discontinuation due to AE occurred in 20 (17.2%) patients receiving pirtobrutinib and 38 (34.9%) patients receiving IC. Conclusion Pirtobrutinib improved PFS and TTNT, and demonstrated favorable tolerability, versus IdelaR/BR in exclusively cBTKi pretreated patients with CLL/SLL.


Supported by Eli Lilly and Company.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology

Related items

Journal of Clinical Oncology;43(22)

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-00166

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)