Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Monrroy H, Pribic T, Galan C, Nieto A, Accarino A, Azpiroz F] Servei d’Aparell Digestiu, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid , Spain. Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain. [Borghi G] Department of Experimental Medicine (Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section) "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy. [Amigo N] Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (Ciberdem), Metabolomics Platform, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain. Biosfer Teslab S.L., Reus, Spain. [Correig X] Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (Ciberdem), Metabolomics Platform, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2019-05-20T07:27:47Z

2019-05-20T07:27:47Z

2019-03-26



Abstract

Gender differences; Meal ingestion; Metabolomic response


Diferències de gènere; Ingestió; Resposta metabolòmica


Diferencias de género; Ingestión; Respuesta metabolómica


In a previous study, we demonstrated that women enjoyed and tolerated lower meal loads than men. Hence, we hypothesized that with the same meal load, their postprandial response is more pronounced than in men. We performed a randomized parallel trial in 12 women and 12 men comparing the postprandial responses to a palatable comfort meal. We measured homeostatic sensations (hunger/satiety, fullness) and hedonic sensations (digestive well-being, mood) on 10 cm scales, vagal tone by heart ratio variability and the metabolomic profile before and after meal ingestion. Gender differences were analyzed by repeated measures ANCOVA. Overall (n = 24), ingestion of the probe meal induced satiation, fullness, digestive well-being and improved mood (main time-effect p ≤ 0.005 for all). Women exhibited a more intense sensory experience, specially more postprandial fullness, than men [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 7.14; p = 0.014]; hedonic responses in women also tended to be stronger than in men. Women exhibited more pronounced effects on vagal tone [main gender-effect F (1, 21) = 5.5; p = 0.029] and a different lipoprotein response than men. In conclusion, our data indicate that gender influences the responses to meal ingestion, and these differences may explain the predisposition and higher incidence in women of meal-related functional disorders.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

MDPI

Related items

Nutrients;11(3)

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/3/702

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)