Integration of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 Dimensional Systems for Personality Disorders Into a Unified Taxonomy With Non-overlapping Traits

Other authors

[Gutiérrez F] Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain. Institut d’Investigacións Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. [Peri JM] Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain. [Gárriz M] Neuropsychiatry and Drug Addiction Institute, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain. [Vall G] Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health, and Addiction, GSS-Hospital Santa Maria, Lleida, Spain. Biomedical Research Institute, Lleida, Spain. [Arqué E, Ruiz L] La Coma Therapeutic Community, ATRA Group, Barcelona, Spain. [Calvo N, Ferrer M] Servei de Psiquiatria, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain. Departament de Psiquiatria i Medicina Legal, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-06-29T10:47:39Z

2021-06-29T10:47:39Z

2021-04-06



Abstract

DSM-5; CIE-11; Trastornos de la personalidad


DSM-5; CIM-11; Trastorns de la personalitat


DSM-5; ICD-11; Personality disorders


The promise of replacing the diagnostic categories of personality disorder with a better-grounded system has been only partially met. We still need to understand whether our main dimensional taxonomies, those of the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), are the same or different, and elucidate whether a unified structure is possible. We also need truly independent pathological domains, as they have shown unacceptable overlap so far. To inquire into these points, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) were administered to 677 outpatients. Disattenuated correlation coefficients between 0.84 and 0.93 revealed that both systems share four analogous traits: negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality/antagonism, and disinhibition. These traits proved scalar equivalence too, such that scores in the two questionnaires are roughly interchangeable. These four domains plus psychoticism formed a theoretically consistent and well-fitted five-factor structure, but they overlapped considerably, thereby reducing discriminant validity. Only after the extraction of a general personality disorder factor (g-PD) through bifactor analysis, we could attain a comprehensive model bearing mutually independent traits.


This work was supported by project PI15/00536, part of the Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013–2016, financed by the ISCIII Subdirección General de Evaluación, and cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF, A way to build Europe; PI: FG).

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Frontiers Media

Related items

Frontiers in Psychiatry;12

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.591934/full

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PE2013-2016/PI15%2F00536

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)