Radical radiotherapy for paediatric solid tumour metastases: An overview of current European protocols and outcomes of a SIOPE multicenter survey

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Huijskens SC, Kroon PS] Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. [Gaze MN] Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK. [Gandola L] Paediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. [Bolle S] Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. [Supiot S] Oncologie Radiotherapie, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Nantes, France. [Giralt J] Servei d’Oncologia Radioteràpica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-07-06T12:12:40Z

2021-07-06T12:12:40Z

2021-03-01



Abstract

Metàstasis; Pediatria; Radioteràpia


Metástasis; Pediatría; Radioterapia


Metastases; Paediatrics; Radiotherapy


Purpose/objective About 20% of children with solid tumours (ST) present with distant metastases (DM). Evidence regarding the use of radical radiotherapy of these DM is sparse and open for personal interpretation. The aim of this survey was to review European protocols and to map current practice regarding the irradiation of DM across SIOPE-affiliated countries. Materials/methods Radiotherapy guidelines for metastatic sites (bone, brain, distant lymph nodes, lung and liver) in eight European protocols for rhabdomyosarcoma, non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma and renal tumours were reviewed. SIOPE centres irradiating ≥50 children annually were invited to participate in an online survey. Results Radiotherapy to at least one metastatic site was recommended in all protocols, except for high-risk neuroblastoma. Per protocol, dose prescription varied per site, and information on delineation and treatment planning/delivery was generally missing. Between July and September 2019, 20/27 centres completed the survey. Around 14% of patients were deemed to have DM from ST at diagnosis, of which half were treated with curative intent. A clear cut-off for a maximum number of DM was not used in half of the centres. Regardless of the tumour type and site, conventional radiotherapy regimens were most commonly used to treat DM. When stereotactic radiotherapy was used, a wide range of fractionation regimens were applied. Conclusion Current radiotherapy guidelines for DM do not allow a consistent approach in a multicentre setting. Prospective (randomised) trials are needed to define the role of radical irradiation of DM from paediatric ST.


Stichting Kinderen Kankervrij [project no. 343]. KiKa (Children Cancer Free) foundation, grant number 343 and title: Towards optimization of radiotherapy techniques for metastatic lesions in children stage IV disease. The funding source had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of this manuscript or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

European Journal of Cancer;145

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959804920314167

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)