Molecular correlates of response to capmatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical and biomarker results from a phase I trial

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Schuler M] Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. [Berardi R] Clinica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche—Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy. [Lim WT] Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore. [de Jonge M] Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. [Bauer TM] Drug Development Unit, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, and Tennessee Oncology, PLCC, Nashville, USA. [Azaro A] Unitat d’Investigació de Teràpia Molecular, Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Departament de Farmacologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-10-20T08:03:21Z

2021-10-20T08:03:21Z

2020-06



Abstract

Mutació del MET; Capmatinib


Mutación del MET; Capmatinib


MET mutation; Capmatinib


Background Dysregulation of receptor tyrosine kinase MET by various mechanisms occurs in 3%–4% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with unfavorable prognosis. While MET is a validated drug target in lung cancer, the best biomarker strategy for the enrichment of a susceptible patient population still remains to be defined. Towards this end we analyze here primary data from a phase I dose expansion study of the MET inhibitor capmatinib in patients with advanced MET-dysregulated NSCLC. Patients and methods Eligible patients [≥18 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2] with MET-dysregulated advanced NSCLC, defined as either (i) MET status by immunohistochemistry (MET IHC) 2+ or 3+ or H-score ≥150, or MET/centromere ratio ≥2.0 or gene copy number (GCN) ≥5, or (ii) epidermal growth factor receptor wild-type (EGFRwt) and centrally assessed MET IHC 3+, received capmatinib at the recommended dose of 400 mg (tablets) or 600 mg (capsules) b.i.d. The primary objective was to determine safety and tolerability; the key secondary objective was to explore antitumor activity. The exploratory end point was the correlation of clinical activity with different biomarker formats. Results Of 55 patients with advanced MET-dysregulated NSCLC, 40/55 (73%) had received two or more prior systemic therapies. All patients discontinued treatment, primarily due to disease progression (69.1%). The median treatment duration was 10.4 weeks. The overall response rate per RECIST was 20% (95% confidence interval, 10.4–33.0). In patients with MET GCN ≥6 (n = 15), the overall response rate by both the investigator and central assessments was 47%. The median progression-free survival per investigator for patients with MET GCN ≥6 was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval, 3.8–11.9). Tumor responses were observed in all four patients with METex14. The most common toxicities were nausea (42%), peripheral edema (33%), and vomiting (31%). Conclusions MET GCN ≥6 and/or METex14 are suited to predict clinical activity of capmatinib in patients with NSCLC (NCT01324479).


This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

Annals of Oncology;31(6)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.293

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)