Practical considerations in the use of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Loupakis F] Unit of Oncology 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy. [Antonuzzo L] Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy. [Bachet JB] Sorbonne Université, Service d’hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière – Paris 6, APHP, Paris, France. [Kuan FC] Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan. [Macarulla T] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Pietrantonio F] Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-11-10T11:04:37Z

2021-11-10T11:04:37Z

2020-10-31



Abstract

Esdeveniments adversos; Càncer colorectal metastàtic; Regorafenib


Eventos adversos; Cáncer colorrectal metastásico; Regorafenib


Adverse events; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Regorafenib


Over the past 20 years, management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably, leading to increased overall survival and more patients eligible for third- or later-line therapy. Currently, two oral therapies are recommended in the third-line treatment of mCRC, regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil. Selecting the most appropriate treatment in the third-line setting poses different challenges compared with treatment selection at earlier stages. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand and differentiate between available treatment options and to communicate the benefits and challenges of these to patients. In this narrative review, practical information on regorafenib is provided to aid physicians in their decision-making and patient communications in daily practice. We discuss the importance of appropriate patient selection and adverse events management through close patient monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure patients stay on treatment for longer and receive as much benefit as possible. We also highlight key physician–patient communication points to facilitate shared decision-making.


The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Bayer.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Related items

Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology;12

https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920956862

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)