Surgical management of complex ileocolonic Crohn’s disease: a survey of IBD colorectal surgeons to assess variability in operative strategy

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Garofalo E] Department of General Surgery, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. [Selvaggi F, Pellino G] Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universitádella Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy. [Spinelli A] Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy. [Flashman K] Colorectal Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital – Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK. [Frasson M] Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. [Espin E] Servei de Cirurgia General, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2022-01-25T12:08:31Z

2022-01-25T12:08:31Z

2021-08



Abstract

Cirurgia colorectal; Malaltia de Crohn; Resecció ileocecal


Cirugía colorrectal; Enfermedad de Crohn; Resección ileocecal


Colorectal surgery; Crohn’s disease; Ileocaecal resection


Introduction To explore the reported variability in the surgical management of ileocolonic Crohn’ s disease and identify areas of standard practice, we present this study which aims to assess how different colorectal surgeons with a subspecialty interest in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) surgery may act in different clinical scenarios of ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Methods Anonymous videos demonstrating the small bowel walkthrough and anonymised patients’ clinical data, imaging and pathological findings were distributed to the surgeons using an electronic tool. Surgeons answered on operative strategy, bowel resections, management of small bowel mesentery, type of anastomosis and use of stomas. Results Eight small bowel walkthrough videos were registered and 12 assessors completed the survey with a questionnaire completion rate of 87.5%. There was 87.7% agreement in the need to perform an ileocolonic resection. However, the agreement for the need to perform associated surgical procedures such as strictureplasties or further bowel resections was only 57.4%. When an anastomosis was fashioned, the side to side configuration was the most commonly used. The preferred management of the mesentery was dissection close to the bowel. Conclusions The decision on the main procedure to be performed had a high agreement amongst the different assessors, but the treatment of multifocal disease was highly controversial, with low agreement on the need for associated procedures to treat internal fistulae and the use of strictureplasties. At the same time, there was significant heterogeneity in the decision on when to anastomose and when to fashion an ileostomy.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer

Related items

International Journal of Colorectal Disease;36

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03892-z

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)