Predictors of Recurrent Stroke After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in the RE‐SPECT ESUS Trial

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Del Brutto VJ] Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL. [Diener HC] Department of Neurology, University DuisburgEssen, Essen, Germany. [Easton JD] Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA. [Granger CB] Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC. [Cronin L] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. [Kleine E] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany. [Molina CA] Unitat d’Ictus i Hemodinàmica Cerebral, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-01-10T08:05:50Z

2023-01-10T08:05:50Z

2022-06-07



Abstract

Risk factors; Secondary prevention; Stroke predictors


Factores de riesgo; Prevención secundaria; Predictores de accidentes cerebrovasculares


Factors de risc; Prevenció secundària; Predictors d'accidents cerebrovasculars


Background We sought to determine recurrent stroke predictors among patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). Methods and Results We applied Cox proportional hazards models to identify clinical features associated with recurrent stroke among participants enrolled in RE‐SPECT ESUS (Randomized, Double‐Blind, Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) trial, an international clinical trial evaluating dabigatran versus aspirin for patients with ESUS. During a median follow‐up of 19 months, 384 of 5390 participants had recurrent stroke (annual rate, 4.5%). Multivariable models revealed that stroke or transient ischemic attack before the index event (hazard ratio [HR], 2.27 [95% CI, 1.83–2.82]), creatinine clearance <50 mL/min (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.23–2.32]), male sex (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.27–2.02]), and CHA2DS2‐VASc ≥4 (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.15–2.08] and HR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.21–2.26] for scores of 4 and ≥5, respectively) versus CHA2DS2‐VASc of 2 to 3, were independent predictors for recurrent stroke. Conclusions In RE‐SPECT ESUS trial, expected risk factors previously linked to other common stroke causes were associated with stroke recurrence. These data help define high‐risk groups for subsequent stroke that may be useful for clinicians and for researchers designing trials among patients with ESUS.


This study was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Wiley

Related items

Journal of the American Heart Association;11(11)

https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023545

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)