Real-world analysis of main clinical outcomes in patients with polycythemia vera treated with ruxolitinib or best available therapy after developing resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Alvarez-Larrán A, Garrote M] Hospital Clínic, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain. [Ferrer-Marín F] Hospital Morales Messeguer, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Murcia, Spain. [Pérez-Encinas M] Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. [Mata-Vazquez MI] Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain. [Bellosillo B] Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain. [Fox ML] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-01-24T09:54:58Z

2023-01-24T09:54:58Z

2022-07-01



Abstract

Hemorrhage; Polycythemia vera; Ruxolitinib


Hemorràgia; Policitèmia vera; Ruxolitinib


Hemorragia; Policitemia vera; Ruxolitinib


Background Ruxolitinib is approved for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but its impact on preventing thrombosis or disease-progression is unknown. Methods A retrospective, real-world analysis was performed on the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to subsequent treatment with ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (BAT; n = 272). Survival probabilities and rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and second primary cancers were calculated according to treatment. To minimize biases in treatment allocation, all results were adjusted by a propensity score for receiving ruxolitinib or BAT. Results Patients receiving ruxolitinib had a significantly lower rate of arterial thrombosis than those on BAT (0.4% vs 2.3% per year; P = .03), and this persisted as a trend after adjustment for the propensity to have received the drug (incidence rate ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.3; P = .09). There were no significant differences in the rates of venous thrombosis (0.8% and 1.1% for ruxolitinib and BAT, respectively; P = .7) and major bleeding (0.8% and 0.9%, respectively; P = .9). Ruxolitinib exposure was not associated with a higher rate of second primary cancers, including all types of neoplasia, noncutaneous cancers, and nonmelanoma skin cancers. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, there were no differences in survival or progression to acute leukemia or myelofibrosis between the 2 groups. Conclusions The results suggest that ruxolitinib treatment for PV patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis.


This work was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III through a National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation Innovación (PI18/01472, PI18/00205, and PI21/00231). The Spanish Group of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (GEMFIN) received a grant from Novartis for developing the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera and for conducting the current project.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Wiley

Related items

Cancer;128(13)

https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34195

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)