Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Colorectal Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Fadel MG] Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. [Ahmed M] Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. [Pellino G] Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy. Unitat de Cirurgia de Còlon i Recte, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Kontovounisios C] Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. [Nicol D] Department of Academic Urology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. [Mayer E] Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Department of Academic Urology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-03-01T11:37:09Z

2023-03-01T11:37:09Z

2023-01-10



Abstract

Colorectal cancer; Lymph node dissection; Metastasis


Cáncer colorrectal; Disección de ganglios linfáticos; Metástasis


Càncer colorectal; Dissecció dels ganglis limfàtics; Metàstasi


The benefits and prognosis of RPLND in CRC have not yet been fully established. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the outcomes for CRC patients with RPLNM undergoing RPLND. A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCare, and CINAHL identified studies from between January 1990 and June 2022 that reported data on clinical outcomes for patients who underwent RPLND for RPLNM in CRC. The following primary outcome measures were derived: postoperative morbidity, disease free-survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and re-recurrence. Nineteen studies with a total of 541 patients were included. Three hundred and sixty-three patients (67.1%) had synchronous RPLNM and 178 patients (32.9%) had metachronous RPLNM. Perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 496 (91.7%) patients. The median DFS was 8.6–38.0 months and 5-year DFS was 24.4% (10.0–60.5%). The median OS was 25.0–83.0 months and 5-year OS was 47.0% (15.0–87.5%). RPLND is a feasible treatment option with limited morbidity and possible oncological benefit for both synchronous and metachronous RPLNM in CRC. Further prospective clinical trials are required to establish a better evidence base for RPLND in the context of RPLNM in CRC and to understand the timing of RPLND in a multimodality pathway in order to optimise treatment outcomes for this group of patients.


This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (IS-BRC-1215–20013), and the NIHR Marsden Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

MDPI

Related items

Cancers;15(2)

https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15020455

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)