Institut Català de la Salut
[Ramos-Campoy S, Puiggros A] Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain. Translational Research on Hematological Neoplasms Group, Cancer Research Program, Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain. [Beà S, Costa D] Hematopathology Unit, Hospital Clínic, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain. [Bougeon S] Oncogenomic Laboratory, Hematology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. [Larráyoz MJ] Cytogenetics and Hematological Genetics Services, Department of Genetics, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. [Ortega M, Bosch F] Servei d’Hematologia, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
2023-05-17T11:57:28Z
2023-05-17T11:57:28Z
2022-03
Chromosome banding; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients
Bandas cromosómicas; Leucemia linfocítica crónica
Bandes cromosòmiques; Leucèmia limfocítica crònica
Genome complexity has been associated with poor outcome in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Previous cooperative studies established five abnormalities as the cut-off that best predicts an adverse evolution by chromosome banding analysis (CBA) and genomic microarrays (GM). However, data comparing risk stratification by both methods are scarce. Herein, we assessed a cohort of 340 untreated CLL patients highly enriched in cases with complex karyotype (CK) (46.5%) with parallel CBA and GM studies. Abnormalities found by both techniques were compared. Prognostic stratification in three risk groups based on genomic complexity (0-2, 3- 4 and ≥5 abnormalities) was also analyzed. No significant differences in the percentage of patients in each group were detected, but only a moderate agreement was observed between methods when focusing on individual cases (κ=0.507; P<0.001). Discordant classification was obtained in 100 patients (29.4%), including 3% classified in opposite risk groups. Most discrepancies were technique-dependent and no greater correlation in the number of abnormalities was achieved when different filtering strategies were applied for GM. Nonetheless, both methods showed a similar concordance index for prediction of time to first treatment (TTFT) (CBA: 0.67 vs. GM: 0.65) and overall survival (CBA: 0.55 vs. GM: 0.57). High complexity maintained its significance in the multivariate analysis for TTFT including TP53 and IGHV status when defined by CBA (hazard ratio [HR] 3.23; P<0.001) and GM (HR 2.74; P<0.001). Our findings suggest that both methods are useful but not equivalent for risk stratification of CLL patients. Validation studies are needed to establish the prognostic value of genome complexity based on GM data in future prospective studies.
Article
Published version
English
Genòmica; Anomalies cromosòmiques; Leucèmia limfocítica crònica - Aspectes genètics; DISEASES::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Histologic Type::Leukemia::Leukemia, Lymphoid::Leukemia, B-Cell::Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/genetics; PHENOMENA AND PROCESSES::Genetic Phenomena::Genetic Variation::Mutation::Chromosome Aberrations; DISCIPLINES AND OCCUPATIONS::Natural Science Disciplines::Biological Science Disciplines::Biology::Computational Biology::Genomics; ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias::neoplasias por tipo histológico::leucemia::leucemia linfoide::leucemia de células B::leucemia linfocítica crónica de células B; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/genética; FENÓMENOS Y PROCESOS::fenómenos genéticos::variación genética::mutación::aberraciones cromosómicas; DISCIPLINAS Y OCUPACIONES::disciplinas de las ciencias naturales::disciplinas de las ciencias biológicas::biología::biología computacional::genómica
Ferrata Storti Foundation
Haematologica;107(3)
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2020.274456
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Articles científics - HVH [3436]