dc.contributor.author
Lozano-Carrascal, Naroa
dc.contributor.author
Anglada-Bosqued, Albert
dc.contributor.author
Salomó-Coll, Oscar
dc.contributor.author
Hernandez Alfaro, Federico
dc.contributor.author
Lay Wang, Hom
dc.contributor.author
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned
2025-05-16T12:59:39Z
dc.date.available
2025-05-16T12:59:39Z
dc.identifier.citation
Lozano-Carrascal, Naroa; Anglada-Bosqued, Albert; Salomó-Coll, Oscar [et al.]. Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (≥8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla: a meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, 2020, 25(2), e-168-179. Disponible en: <http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/aop/23248.pdf>. Fecha de acceso: 28 sep. 2021. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.23248
dc.identifier.issn
1698-4447
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/2824
dc.description.abstract
Background: One of the greatest challenges that dentists face today is to rehabilitate severe atrophied alveolar ridges in partially and completely edentulous patients with implants. Despite the high survival rate of implants placed next to sinus elevation, this technique presents complications that can be avoided by placing short implants, an option that also presents high survival rates. For this reason, the aim of this study is to compare the survival rate, marginal bone loss and complications associated with short implants (<8 mm) versus longer implants (≥8mm) placed with lateral sinus floor elevation in posterior atrophic maxillae. Material and Methods: A literature search was conducted by two independent reviewers in the PubMed/Medline (National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC) electronic database for articles published from January 2007 to July 2018. Seven qualified articles were selected for the meta-analysis. Results: The test for overall effect did not find statistical significance in the survival rates, overall complications, intra-operative complications, post-operative complications and prosthetic complications. However, the test showed statistically significant differences in biological complications in favor of standard implants, and marginal bone loss between control and test groups in favor of short implants (<8mm) was found. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, prosthetic rehabilitations with short implants (<8mm) in posterior maxilla is a reliable treatment option as an alternative to lateral wall sinus floor augmentation.
dc.publisher
Medicina Oral
dc.relation.ispartof
Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal
dc.relation.ispartofseries
25;2
dc.rights
© 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Augment del sòl sinusal lateral
dc.subject
Assaig controlat aleatori
dc.subject
Taxa de supervivència
dc.subject
Pèrdua òssia marginal
dc.subject
Implante corto
dc.subject
Aumento del suelo del seno lateral
dc.subject
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado
dc.subject
Tasa de supervivencia
dc.subject
Complicaciones
dc.subject
Pérdida ósea marginal
dc.subject
Lateral sinus floor augmentation
dc.subject
Randomized controlled trial
dc.subject
Marginal bone loss
dc.title
Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (≥8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla: a meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.description.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi
https://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23248
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess